Exploring the Concept of Time as a Wavefront in Modern Physics

  • Thread starter NorseMN
  • Start date
  • Tags
    time
In summary, modern physics has explored the concept of time as a wavefront, challenging the traditional linear understanding of time. This theory suggests that time is not a static entity, but rather a continuously evolving wave that can be altered by gravity and other physical forces. This perspective has led to new insights on the nature of time and its relationship to space and the universe as a whole. It has also opened up new possibilities for understanding the concept of time in both theoretical and practical applications.
  • #1
NorseMN
OK, I made up the name "time as a wavefront" and I don't know that it really fits.
But I had this thought recently and I wonder whether/where/how it fits into modern physics theory.
An inertial body in motion through the three spatial dimensions retains it's motion.
Consider all of the universe as in constant velocity motion along the fourth dimensional time axis.
Consider that time has no "length" in its direction of travel, so "the present" exists as a "wavefront".
This seems to have some general alignment with micro and macro visions of physics.
The movements of massive bodies are predictable due to a high "time momentum".
The actions of quantum particles are unpredictable due to near zero "time momentum".

Obviously, this is not a complete or even well considered theory.
Just some vague thoughts that probably aren't even self-consistent.
Is anything about this familiar to anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's great that you are thinking about this stuff, and I hope it leads you on to learn more and discover more. In the words of Richard Feynman, 'it's fun to think about.' Unfortunately you posted this question in the New Member introduction forum and it will probably soon be moved or deleted by a moderator as per the guidelines. So, read the guidelines! Especially the ones on 'personal theories.' And then find the appropriate forum for your thoughts. Okay?
 
  • #3
So much for my credibility.
I'll see if I can find the correct place to post this.
Thanks for advising me.
 
  • #4
Oh, don't talk like that. Your credibility is still in tact. At least as far as I'm concerned. :-)
 
  • #5
Also, but sure you read the part of the rules forbidding personal theories.

Welcome to the forum.
 
  • #6
Having now browsed the rules, it appears that this might not be the correct website for my question.
I'm not actually trying to propose or promote any theory.
I'm just seeking some guidance on whether this perspective is reflected by any accepted theories.
I have no expectation that I've come up with an original idea, so I assume that it either exists somewhere, or it's complete nonsense.
The only possible place I see to post this question is in the PF Lounge - General Discussion.
Would that be appropriate?
 
  • #7
I think that it amounts to a personal theory which, as you have gathered, is probably best explored on some other forum but I hope you'll stick around here to discuss accepted science.

If you do post it in the general discussion forum make sure to be clear that you are not trying to promote any alternative theories but only to understand how your way of thinking about it fits in with accepted science. Even that may not be enough to keep the thread from being closed but I don't think it will get you banned.

One thing to keep in mind is that this is the best Physics forum in English anywhere in the world and it is that way because the moderators do a great, but unpaid, job so try to avoid making more work for them.
 
  • #8
NorseMN said:
Having now browsed the rules, it appears that this might not be the correct website for my question.
I'm not actually trying to propose or promote any theory.
I'm just seeking some guidance on whether this perspective is reflected by any accepted theories.
I have no expectation that I've come up with an original idea, so I assume that it either exists somewhere, or it's complete nonsense.
The only possible place I see to post this question is in the PF Lounge - General Discussion.
Would that be appropriate?
General discussion is not for discussions of actual science, it is for discussions of hobbies, jokes, things of general interest. All of the Forum Rules apply there and there are some additional rules that are Pinned at the top, several sub-forums have additional rules pinned at the top so always be sure to check for them before posting.
 
  • #9
I discovered this forum when a link popped up in a random Google search.
Then I stumbled blindly into it like a bull into a china shop, breaking crystal clear rules with abandon.
Even after I was alerted to the rules, I jumped into the next room and broke the same rule again.
I didn't enter the General Discussion section until after I had posted the question about it.
I immediately found that it reinforced the same ban on speculative theories.
My sincere apologies.
After contemplating my poor manners, I came to understand how distracting this behavior must have been at some point, to evolve such rules.
It makes perfect sense.

I've started to browse a few conversations and was tempted to enter a response to one, until I noticed that it took place in 2012.
Time-travel is one of my favorite science fiction themes, but I think I'll look for some more current conversations.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

Related to Exploring the Concept of Time as a Wavefront in Modern Physics

1. What is the concept of time as a wavefront in modern physics?

The concept of time as a wavefront in modern physics is based on the theory of general relativity, which suggests that time is not a fixed and constant entity, but rather a dynamic and relative one. This means that time can be affected by factors such as gravity and velocity, and can also vary depending on the observer's perspective.

2. How does the concept of time as a wavefront impact our understanding of the universe?

The concept of time as a wavefront has greatly impacted our understanding of the universe by providing a deeper understanding of how time and space are interconnected. It has also led to the development of theories such as the expanding universe and the concept of spacetime, which have revolutionized our understanding of the cosmos.

3. What evidence supports the idea of time as a wavefront?

There are several pieces of evidence that support the idea of time as a wavefront. One is the phenomenon of time dilation, where time appears to slow down for objects in motion. Another is the gravitational time dilation, where time appears to pass slower in areas with a stronger gravitational field. Additionally, the observation of gravitational waves, which are ripples in the fabric of spacetime, also supports the concept of time as a wavefront.

4. How does the concept of time as a wavefront differ from traditional concepts of time?

The traditional concept of time is based on the idea that time is a fixed and universal entity that moves forward at a constant rate. In contrast, the concept of time as a wavefront suggests that time is a dynamic and relative entity that can be affected by various factors. It also challenges the idea of time as a linear progression, instead viewing it as a multidimensional and interconnected concept.

5. What are the practical applications of understanding time as a wavefront?

Understanding time as a wavefront has practical applications in fields such as astrophysics, where it helps us to better understand the behavior of objects in space and the nature of the universe. It also has implications for technologies such as GPS, which rely on precise time measurements, as well as for the development of future technologies such as time travel. Additionally, it can also have philosophical and existential implications for our understanding of our own existence and the concept of time itself.

Similar threads

Goal-oriented aspiring mathematician and mathematical physicist
    • New Member Introductions
Replies
2
Views
203
The strangest intro you'll ever read....
    • New Member Introductions
Replies
2
Views
139
I Why no plane waves of macroscopic bodies? The micro-macro threshold...
    • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
I General Relativity: Exploring Space & Time
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Hall effect in P-type semiconductors: electron-centric heuristic?
    • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
524
I Trying To Conceptualize Two Dimensions Of Time
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Special relativity and expansion of the Universe, A paradox
    • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
B Absolute Time, I know its wrong and all but tell me if I got it right
    • Classical Physics
Replies
9
Views
951
B Does Negative Mass Have Physical Significance in Modern Theories?
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
Physics Is returning to school sensible for me?
    • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
33
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top