Exploring the Possibility of Multiverse and Dark Energy in Our Universe

  • Thread starter laymanhobbist
  • Start date
In summary: The theory speculates that the speed of light would be the fastest possible speed if there were no dark energy in the universe.
  • #1
laymanhobbist
29
2
i will write down some stuff here which onr night i wrote down while stoned ..lol

understanding is a complete fail ? i have no knowledge except what i seen on tv .. after few hours what i wrote down isn't making any sense to myself ... where did i even find those words :lol:

our big bang is just another singularity . correct ?

why can't it be ? it could just another singularity . i believe a dent in the space time fabric caused by a black hole rips through the multdimensional multi verse which made it possible to transfer stuffs through the black hole, and the dark energy itself flowed to our universe from another multiverse ..

and there you have it , on the otherside of the black hole the ever expanding universe with time as the 4rth dimension ...

and we are the byproducts of a universe with 4 dimensions and four forces .. just a thought

think of the probabilty in that

a collapsing star would have a great influence on the space time fabric around it .. and it curves so much that somehow the graviton interacts (made to repel ?one mega force )with each other creating a singualrityis it possible that the spacetime fabric curvature comes close enough for the gravitons to interact during the collapsing of a star ?our big bang and our universe could be one among millions of other big bangs in the membrane
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
To fathom Hell or soar angelic, just take a pinch of psychedelic

o:)
 
  • #3
Will the philosophy forum take this thread?
Not sure where psychedelic OP’s should be moved to. Homework?
 
  • #4
"The common descriptive treatments can lead too easily to vain and foolish speculation by students who have been carried over their heads by excellent and persuasive prose"

- William Burke
 
  • #5
Lee Smolin has suggested black holes may form new universes in such a manner. He further speculates the parameters of our universe have been optimized to produce black holes via 'cosmic natural selection'. It's an interesting idea.
 
  • #6
thanks Chronos , its nice to know what i have written down that night isn't a complete fail .. and i guess i like to learn more about smolin's universe , which i haven't heard of before

The theory surmises that a collapsing black hole causes the emergence of a new universe on the "other side", whose fundamental constant parameters (speed of light, Planck length and so forth) may differ slightly from those of the universe where the black hole collapsed. Each universe therefore gives rise to as many new universes as it has black holes. Thus the theory contains the evolutionary ideas of "reproduction" and "mutation" of universes, but has no direct analogue of natural selection. However, given any universe that can produce black holes that successfully spawn new universes, it is possible that some number of those universes will reach heat death with unsuccessful parameters. So, in a sense, fecundity cosmological natural selection is one where universes could die off before successfully reproducing, just as any biological being can die without having children

exactly what i had in my mind :D
 
  • #7
I take it you made up that user name while stoned too... :-p Is a hobbist like a hobbit?
 
  • #8
:smile:

yea i guess so , but it was supposed to be hobbyist .. typo under the influence mate :D
 
Last edited:
  • #9
i think dark energy travels faster than light itself ... otherwise how far would the first light from a singualrity go to ? errrrrr
 

FAQ: Exploring the Possibility of Multiverse and Dark Energy in Our Universe

Am I completely wrong for questioning established scientific theories?

No, questioning established theories is a fundamental part of the scientific process. It allows for new discoveries and advancements in our understanding of the world.

How do I know if my hypothesis is completely wrong?

A hypothesis can never be proven completely wrong, but it can be disproven through experimentation and evidence. The more evidence that supports a hypothesis, the more likely it is to be correct.

Can I be completely wrong about a scientific concept?

It is possible to have misconceptions or misunderstandings about scientific concepts, but this does not necessarily mean you are completely wrong. Keep an open mind and continue learning and seeking evidence to support your understanding.

Is it okay to admit I am completely wrong about something?

Absolutely. Admitting when we are wrong is important for personal growth and for the advancement of scientific knowledge. It takes courage and humility to admit our mistakes, and it shows a commitment to seeking the truth.

How can I avoid being completely wrong about scientific information?

Stay informed and seek out reliable sources of information. Be open to new evidence and perspectives, and critically evaluate information before accepting it as fact. It's also important to understand that science is constantly evolving and new discoveries can challenge previously accepted ideas.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top