Exploring the Relationships between Triangles - A Mathematical Analysis

In summary, the conversation is about a picture that represents the relations of two triangles and someone asking for an explanation of what is going on with the triangles. The expert summarizer provides a summary of the conversation and advises against continuing the conversation as it may lead to a heated argument.
  • #1
mssrki
4
0
See a picture that represents the relations of the two triangles
15d06cj.png
what is a "?"
3?3=3
3?3=4
3?3=5
3?3=6
3?3=7
3?3=8
3?3=9
3?3=10
3?3=12
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #3
topsquark said:
Until you explain what is going on with those triangles you're not likely to get any better response than you did at MHF.

-Dan

When you look at the solution below will not be clear
1. 3 + [0] 3 = 3
2. 3 + [1] 3 = 4
3. 3 + [2] 3 = 5
4. 3 + [3] 3 = 6 or 3 +3 = 6
5.33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 7
6.33Rd1 (6) d2 (8) +3 = 8
7.33Rd1 (6) d2 (9) +3 = 9
8.33Rd1 (6) d2 (10) +3 = 10
9.33Rd1 (6) d2 (12) +3 = 12
(1,2,3,4) - There are many forms of addition in the set N
(5,6,7,8,9) - numbers that are dynamic, where it is possible to add this
_______________________________________________
You realize that you have to Presenting part by part, where you will see my work that my math becomes ideal (that every challenge has a solution)
 
  • #4
mssrki said:
When you look at the solution below will not be clear

Erm... math with whatever basis is about being clear... :confused:
 
  • #5
mssrki said:
When you look at the solution below will not be clear...

Well, you are right about it not being clear.

To be perfectly honest, I have no idea what you are trying to demonstrate here.
 
  • #6
MarkFL said:
Well, you are right about it not being clear.

To be perfectly honest, I have no idea what you are trying to demonstrate here.
1 Mathematics Space
We'll tell mathematical space with two initial geometric object that can not
prove.
1.Natural geometric object - natural along .
2.Real geometric objects - real alongs .
1.1 Natural along
In the picture there is a natural geometric object along (AB), it has a beginning (A)
and end (B) - this property natural long'll call point.
View attachment 555
1.2 The basic rule
Two (more) natural longer are connected only with points.
 

Attachments

  • www1.png
    www1.png
    630 bytes · Views: 51
  • #7
mssrki said:
1 Mathematics Space
We'll tell mathematical space with two initial geometric object that can not
prove.
1.Natural geometric object - natural along .
2.Real geometric objects - real alongs .
1.1 Natural along
In the picture there is a natural geometric object along (AB), it has a beginning (A)
and end (B) - this property natural long'll call point.
View attachment 555
1.2 The basic rule
Two (more) natural longer are connected only with points.
Look, I've seen this happen before and this path will only lead to a hideously long set of posts and eventually cause one of the Ads or Mods to close off the thread.

So. Define what a "dynamic number" is. Explain that business with the 3?3. And finally please tell me what the heck rule you are using for those (Swearing) triangles.

Please answer these questions clearly without being pedantic or vague and maybe we'll get somewhere with this conversation. If you can't do that then you are no better than a troll.

-Dan

PS I feel like I'm channeling Plato. :)
 
  • #8
topsquark said:
So. Define what a "dynamic number" is.
when you combine two real numeric longer than along the limited numerical (dynamical numbers are always defined, not as a permanent natural or real numbers),containing the real numbers and limited numerical
topsquark said:
. Explain that business with the 3?3. And finally please tell me what the heck rule you are using for those (Swearing) triangles.
all triangles with the merger (operations of addition )
you seem to have a lot of impatient, you piece by piece to conquer in order to understand the above written
------------------------
the first evidence -
2 Natural Mathematics
2.1 Along , one-way infinite along the (semi-line) "1"
"1"-from any previous evidence (axioms), a new proof
Theorem-Two (more) natural longer merge points in the direction of the first AB
longer natural.

EVIDENCE - Natural long (AB, BC) are connected - we get along AC.

View attachment 561

Natural long (AB, BC, CD) are connected - we get along AD.

View attachment 562

Natural long (AB, BC, CD, DE) are connected - we get along AE.
View attachment 563
...
Natural long (AB, BC, CD, DE, ...) are connected - getting the sim-
measurement along the infinite.

View attachment 564
...
 

Attachments

  • www2.png
    www2.png
    877 bytes · Views: 47
  • www3.png
    www3.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 48
  • www4.png
    www4.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 50
  • www5.png
    www5.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 46
  • #9
Hi everyone, :)

I don't think this thread will have any useful input other than going into a heated argument. Hence I am closing it.

If you have any comments about this please feel free to start a thread in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f25/.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 

FAQ: Exploring the Relationships between Triangles - A Mathematical Analysis

What is "Mathematics - a new basis"?

"Mathematics - a new basis" is a mathematical theory proposed by a team of scientists that aims to provide a new framework for understanding and solving mathematical problems.

How is "Mathematics - a new basis" different from traditional mathematics?

The main difference is that "Mathematics - a new basis" uses a different set of fundamental axioms and definitions compared to traditional mathematics. This allows for a new perspective and approach to solving mathematical problems.

What are the potential applications of "Mathematics - a new basis"?

Since "Mathematics - a new basis" offers a different way of thinking about and approaching mathematical problems, it has the potential to be applied in various fields such as physics, computer science, and economics.

Is "Mathematics - a new basis" widely accepted in the scientific community?

As with any new theory, there is ongoing debate and discussion within the scientific community about the validity and usefulness of "Mathematics - a new basis". However, it has gained some recognition and has been studied and discussed by mathematicians and scientists.

How can "Mathematics - a new basis" benefit society?

By offering a new perspective and approach to solving mathematical problems, "Mathematics - a new basis" has the potential to lead to new discoveries and advancements in various fields. It could also help make complex concepts more accessible and understandable for a wider audience.

Similar threads

Back
Top