MHB Exponential Equation Help with Log Tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Log
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation ${2.884}^{x}=0.01439$ using log tables, the correct approach involves calculating the logarithms of both sides. The exact solution is given as $x=\frac{\log(0.01439)}{\log(2.884)}$, which simplifies to approximately -4.004. Errors in earlier calculations were identified, particularly in the evaluation of $\log(0.01439)$, which should be correctly calculated as $\log(1.439) - 2$. The final calculations confirm that the logarithmic values lead to the correct result of $x \approx -4.004$.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Directions: Use a log table to solve for x:

${2.884}^{x}=0.01439$

$x*\log\left({2.884}\right)=\log\left({0.01439}\right)$

$x=\frac{\log\left({0.01439}\right)}{\log\left({2.884}\right)}$ is the exact answer.

The solution to the problem is -4.004 in the back of the book.

To evaluate the logarithms with table:

$\log\left({.01439}\right)\equiv\log\left({1.439}\right)-2, where \log\left({1.439}\right)=.15806$

$-2.15806, 8.15806-10$

$\log\left({2.884}\right)=.46000$

$x=\frac{-2.15806}{.46000}$ drop the negative sign to compute the logarithms.

$\log\left({\frac{2.15806}{.46}}\right)=\log\left({2.15806}\right)-\log\left({.46}\right)$

$\log\left({2.15806}\right)=.3340512$

$.3340512, 10.3340512-10$

$\log\left({.4600}\right)\equiv\log\left({4.600}\right)-1, where \log\left({4.600}\right)=.66276$

$-1.66276, 9.66276-10$

Now, I need some help to subtract the correct values of $\log\left({2.15806}\right)$ and $\log\left({.46000}\right)$ to get the answer of .60249 in the log table.Thanks for the help

CBarker1
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Directions: Use a log table to solve for x:

${2.884}^{x}=0.01439$

$x*\log\left({2.884}\right)=\log\left({0.01439}\right)$

$x=\frac{\log\left({0.01439}\right)}{\log\left({2.884}\right)}$ is the exact answer.

The solution to the problem is -4.004 in the back of the book.

To evaluate the logarithms with table:

$\log\left({.01439}\right)\equiv\color{red}\log\left({1.439}\right)-2, where \log\left({1.439}\right)=.15806$

$\color{red}-2.15806, 8.15806-10$

...

Good morning,

I've marked in red the calculations where you made a mistake:

$$-2 + 0.15806 \approx -1.84194$$

and

$$\log(1.84194) = 0.26528$$

This error occurs in your following calculations again.

The best would be if you keep mantissae and prefixes separated.
 
Cbarker1 said:
Directions: Use a log table to solve for x:

...

Hello again,

I'll show you how I've learned to use a log table. (I visited school without calculators or computers. The most advanced piece of technology was a slide-ruler!)

You want to calculate

$$|x| = \frac{1.84194}{0.46}$$

with a log table. "op" means operation of the logarithms, N is the numerus and log means the logarithm base 10.

$$\begin{array}{c|l|c|l}op & N & & log \\ \hline \text{-} & 1.84194 & \rightarrow & 0.26528 \\ & 0.46 & \rightarrow & 0.66276 - 1 \\ \hline & 4.0042 & \leftarrow & 0.60252 \end{array}$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top