Expression for magnitude of the constant friction force

In summary, the expression for the magnitude of the constant friction force is determined by the equation \( F_f = \mu N \), where \( F_f \) represents the friction force, \( \mu \) is the coefficient of friction, and \( N \) is the normal force acting on the object. This relationship indicates that the frictional force is directly proportional to the normal force and depends on the surface characteristics represented by the coefficient of friction.
  • #1
Racoon5
6
4
Homework Statement
After the skier reaches the ground at point P in Figure 1, she begins braking and comes to a halt at point Q. Find an expression for the magnitude of the constant friction force that acts on her between point P and Q.
Relevant Equations
W=f*d
I approached the problem using the work done by force equation (W=F*d)
In my understanding all potential energy would have been converted into kinetic energy (KE) by point P (no friciton)
We know d= L ; W= Wf ; f = Ff height = (H+h)
So the Energy at point P is entirely kinetic:
Which translates into: EP= mg(H+h)

because Wf= mg(H+h)

so mg(H+h)= Ffx L

after solving for Ff I get Ff = mg(H+h) / L

My concern is that visually point P still has potential energy. However, the text indicates that this is not the case as the "skier reaches the ground at point P".
Screenshot 2024-08-14 at 1.32.59 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can we see the diagram? Note that the ground, expecially in a ski resort, is not necessarily flat.
 
  • #3
PeroK said:
Can we see the diagram? Note that the ground, expecially in a ski resort, is not necessarily flat.
Apologies, I forgot to attach the diagram. I have amended my original post
 
  • #4
Racoon5 said:
Apologies, I forgot to attach the diagram. I have amended my original post
Your expression is correct. You don't have to worry about the intermediate state of kinetic + potential at point P. All that matters is the total change in PE between the start and point Q. (As the skier is at rest - has no KE - at both these points.)
 
  • #5
PeroK said:
Your expression is correct. You don't have to worry about the intermediate state of kinetic + potential at point P. All that matters is the total change in PE between the start and point Q. (As the skier is at rest - has no KE - at both these points.)
Okay if we think about it that way, is this approach correct:

##Wf = f*d##
Wf = PE = mg(H+h)
f = Ff (friction force)
d = L

so

##mg(H+h) = Ff * L##

solved for Ff =

##Ff = \frac {mg(H+h} {L}## ?

Im also struggling to use LaTeX engine as you can tell

W_f = F_f L
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Racoon5 said:
Okay if we think about it that way, is this approach correct:

##Wf = f*d##
Wf = PE = mg(H+h)
f = Ff (friction force)
d = L

so

##mg(H+h) = Ff * L##

solved for Ff =

##Ff = \frac {mg(H+h} {L}## ?

Im also struggling to use LaTeX engine as you can tell
Yes, although it's not necessary always to use ##d## for the distance. In this case, you can simply write:
$$W_f = F_f L$$
 
  • Like
Likes Racoon5
  • #7
Racoon5 said:
##Ff = \frac {mg(H+h} {L}## ?

Im also struggling to use LaTeX engine as you can tell
It is because you embedded [] controls in the LaTeX (for SUB, in this case).
Using the LaTeX for subscript (underscore) gives
##F_f = \frac {mg(H+h} {L}##.
The other error is a missing ). Fixing that:
##F_f = \frac {mg(H+h)} {L}##.
 
  • #8
Racoon5 said:
So the Energy at point P is entirely kinetic:
Which translates into: EP= mg(H+h)
Welcome, @Racoon5 !
That equation is incorrectly including an energy that gravity has not given away yet when the skier reaches point P, which is the height differential between points P and Q times mg.

Racoon5 said:
My concern is that visually point P still has potential energy. However, the text indicates that this is not the case as the "skier reaches the ground at point P".
In this case, reaching the ground means commencement of friction action, rather than reaching the height of lowest potential energy.

Good having you here!
 
Back
Top