Expression for the magnitude of an electric field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point A due to two charged rings, using the expression k(q_1-q_2)/(R^2+x^2)^(3/2). The x-component of the electric field from each ring is computed separately, with the understanding that due to symmetry, the y and z components will cancel out. It is clarified that while q1 is greater than q2, the fields should be added as vectors, resulting in a net field of (A-B)hat x. The integration process involves ignoring the y and z components, as they will equal zero. The setup for the integral must account for both halves of the ring, requiring a multiplication by two for the x-component.
mousey
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Find an expression for the magnitude of the electric field at point A midway between the two rings of radius R shown in the figure below. The ring on the left has a uniform charge q1 and the ring on the right has a uniform charge q2. The rings are separated by distance d. Assume the positive x axis points to the right, through the center of the rings. (Use any variable or symbol stated above along with the following as necessary: k for Coulomb's constant. Assume q1 is greater than q2, and that both charges are positive.)
(picture in replies)
Relevant Equations
E= (kq)/d^2
k(q_1-q_2)/(R^2+x^2)^3/2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1625946585102.png
 
You basically, have to consider one ring, let's say the left one, and calculate the magnitude of the electric field at A due to it, that is calculate the line integral $$\vec{E_1}=\int_{ring 1}\frac{k\rho_1 (\vec{r}-\vec{r'})dr'}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|^3}$$, where $$\vec{r}=\frac{d}{2}\hat x$$,$$\rho_1=\frac{q_1}{2\pi R}$$, $$dr'=\sqrt{1+(f'(z))^2}dz$$ $$f(z)=\sqrt{R^2-z^2}$$, $$\vec{r'}=\sqrt{R^2-z^2}\hat y+z\hat z$$.

It is enough to calculate only the x-component of ##\vec{E_1}##, because the point A lies on the axis that passes through the center of the ring, hence due to symmetry reasons, the y and z components of ##\vec{E_1}## will be zero at point A.

Then calculate similarly the contribution ##\vec{E_2}## to the electric field from the ring to the right, and then take the sum $$\vec{E}=\vec{E_1}+\vec{E_2}$$ for the total electric field E at point A.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. I'm just wondering, the problem says q1 is greater than q2, and both are positive, so wouldn't I subtract E1-E2? Do I integrate both and then subtract?
 
mousey said:
Thank you. I'm just wondering, the problem says q1 is greater than q2, and both are positive, so wouldn't I subtract E1-E2? Do I integrate both and then subtract?
The fields add as vectors, snd as scalars along the x axis. But as scalars, one will have a negative value.
Yes, find each field separately before combining them.
 
Yes , well if you find that $$\vec{E_1}=A\hat x$$ where A is a scalar function of ##q_1,R,d## then you ll find that $$\vec{E_2}=-B \hat x$$ where B is another scalar function of ##q_2,R,d##, so that $$\vec{E_1}+\vec{E_2}=(A-B)\hat x$$

Just remember that when you do all the substitutions (for ##\vec{r},\vec{r'} , dr ## e.t.c) you ll end up with an integral that has ##\hat y## and ##\hat z## terms as well as the ##\hat x## term. Just ignore the first two terms (or maybe you can integrate as an excercise to prove that those integrals would be zero) and focus on the ##\hat x## term that is the x-component of the E-field.

And actually the way I 've setup ##\vec{r'}## is for the integral of the upper half of the ring. To calculate the integral for the lower half you got to set ##\vec{r'}=-\sqrt{R^2-z^2}\hat y+z\hat z##. This also means that when you calculate the x-component you got to multiply it by 2 (the x-component is the same for the upper half and for the lower half).
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top