MHB Expression sin^n(x)/(sin^n(x)+cos^n(x))

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vali
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The expression sin^n(x)/(sin^n(x)+cos^n(x)) can be simplified to 1/(cot^n(x)+1) by dividing both the numerator and denominator by sin^n(x). This transformation leads to a clearer understanding of the relationship between the two forms. The user initially struggled with this simplification but successfully grasped the concept after receiving guidance. The discussion highlights the importance of manipulating expressions in trigonometry to reveal equivalences. Ultimately, the user expressed gratitude for the assistance received.
Vali
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I have sin^n(x)/(sin^n(x)+cos^n(x))
The expression is the same with 1/(ctg^n(x)+1) and I have no idea how to get to this answer.
Can you help me?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you divide the numerator and denominator by \(\sin^n(x)\) what do you get?
 
1/[(sin^n(x)+cos^n(x))/sin^n(x)]
edit:
I get it.Thanks a lot! :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top