Extraordinary claims who said that?

  • Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date
In summary, the phrase "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" is often attributed to Carl Sagan, but it was actually first coined by Marcello Truzzi, founder of CSICOP. However, this phrase may have been influenced by a similar quote from Laplace and even further back, the statement by David Hume that "A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence." Truzzi's version of the phrase has also been credited to Dirac's hesitation in accepting his own theory until there was solid evidence to support it.
  • #1
DaveC426913
Gold Member
22,990
6,666
"Extraordinary claims..." who said that?

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."

Obviously, Carl popularized it, but is he the one who coined it?

I just read in my book "Escape from Hell"*, that it was Descartes who first said this. True?

*(Carl is in Dante's Eighth Circle of Hell (along with Diviners and Fortune Tellers) for being a false prophet. He started teaching science but then it got way from him and he started making predictions about Earth's demise in a Great Ice Age).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Laplace: “The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness.”
 
  • #3


To the best of my knowledge, it was Marcello Truzzi. Founder of CSICOP, left on a bad note and coined the term "pseudo-skepticism". He definitely said it before Sagan.

WIKIPEDIA said:
Truzzi is credited with originating the oft-used phrase "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof," which Carl Sagan then popularized as "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."[15] However, this is a rewording of a quote by Laplace which goes, "The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness."[16] This, in turn, may have been based on the statement "A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence" by David Hume.[15]

So I guess it wasn't Truzzi.
 
  • #4


D H said:
Laplace: “The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness.”

If you consider Dirac's equation of his "sea", his own reluctance to accept the theory until positrons were more than definitely detected would be a fine example of this in real science. In a time when theory is the forerunner of experimentation (often), this is even more critical than at any time in history.
 
  • #5


David Hume at least had a variation of it when he wrote about his skepticism towards the possibility of divine miracles.
 

FAQ: Extraordinary claims who said that?

What is considered an "extraordinary claim"?

An extraordinary claim is any statement or assertion that goes against established scientific principles or lacks sufficient evidence to support it. These claims often involve supernatural or paranormal phenomena, and are not easily explained by current scientific knowledge.

Who is responsible for making this claim?

The individual or group making the claim is responsible for providing evidence and supporting their argument. As scientists, it is our job to critically evaluate these claims and determine their validity based on the available evidence.

How do scientists approach extraordinary claims?

Scientists approach extraordinary claims with skepticism and a methodical approach to gathering and evaluating evidence. This involves conducting experiments, analyzing data, and peer-reviewing findings before accepting them as valid.

What is the difference between extraordinary claims and scientific theories?

Extraordinary claims lack substantial evidence to support them, whereas scientific theories are rigorously tested and supported by a large body of evidence. Scientific theories are also subject to change as new evidence is discovered, whereas extraordinary claims often remain unsubstantiated.

Can extraordinary claims ever be proven?

While it is possible for extraordinary claims to be proven, it is highly unlikely without substantial evidence. As scientists, we must always remain open-minded and continue to evaluate new evidence, but extraordinary claims require a higher level of proof before they can be accepted as valid.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top