MHB Factoring Fractional Expression

AI Thread Summary
The expression (x^3/8) - (512/x^3) can be simplified by finding a common denominator, resulting in (x^6 - 4096)/8x^3. The numerator can be factored as [(x^3 - 64)(x^3 + 64)], recognizing that x^6 - 4096 is a difference of squares. Further factoring reveals both a sum and difference of cubes in the numerator. The discussion emphasizes the need to explore additional factorization options for a complete solution. The final answer is not yet reached, indicating further simplification is possible.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Factor (x^3/8) - (512/x^3).

LCD = 8x^3

(x^6 - 8(512))/8x^3

(x^6 - 4096)/8x^3

[(x^3 - 64)(x^3 + 64)]/8x^3

In the numerator, the expression (x^3 - 64) is the difference of cubes, right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, in fact:

$$x^6-4096=x^6-2^{12}=\left(x^3\right)^2-\left(2^6\right)^2=\left(x^3+2^6\right)\left(x^3-2^6\right)=\left(x^3+\left(2^2\right)^3\right)\left(x^3-\left(2^2\right)^3\right)$$
 
Is that the final answer? Can we reduce it further?
 
RTCNTC said:
Is that the final answer? Can we reduce it further?

It can be factored further, as there is both a sum and difference of cubes there. Bear in mind I only dealt with the numerator. :D
 
I will complete the problem when time allows.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top