- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading W. Keith Nicholson's book: Introduction to Abstract Algebra (Third Edition) ...
I am focused on Section 4.2:Factorization of Polynomials over a Filed.
I need some help with Example 10 on page 215 ...
The relevant text from Nicholson's book is as follows:View attachment 4591In the above text, we read the following:
" ... ... Reduction modulo \(\displaystyle 2\) gives \(\displaystyle \overline{f(x)} = x^4 + x + 1\) in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}_2 [x]\). This polynomial has no roots in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}_2\), so it fails to be irreducible ... ... "Can someone please explain the reasoning behind the statement that since the polynomial has no roots in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}_2\) then it fails to be irreducible?
Hope someone can help ... ...
Peter
I am focused on Section 4.2:Factorization of Polynomials over a Filed.
I need some help with Example 10 on page 215 ...
The relevant text from Nicholson's book is as follows:View attachment 4591In the above text, we read the following:
" ... ... Reduction modulo \(\displaystyle 2\) gives \(\displaystyle \overline{f(x)} = x^4 + x + 1\) in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}_2 [x]\). This polynomial has no roots in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}_2\), so it fails to be irreducible ... ... "Can someone please explain the reasoning behind the statement that since the polynomial has no roots in \(\displaystyle \mathbb{Z}_2\) then it fails to be irreducible?
Hope someone can help ... ...
Peter