Failed rocket problem (momentum conservation, Kleppner 4-4)

In summary, the "Failed rocket problem" illustrates the principle of momentum conservation by examining a rocket that does not achieve the desired propulsion due to fuel expulsion issues. The problem highlights that even if the rocket's mass decreases, the momentum can remain constant if the expulsion of fuel is not directed properly. It emphasizes the importance of both the conservation of momentum and the correct application of thrust to achieve motion, as discussed in Kleppner's physics text.
  • #1
Michael Korobov
6
0
Homework Statement
An instrument-carrying rocket accidentally explodes at the top of its trajectory. The horizontal distance between the launch point and the point of explosion is L. The rocket breaks into two pieces that fly apart horizontally. The larger piece has three times the mass of the smaller piece. To the surprise of the scientist in charge, the smaller piece returns to Earth at the launching station. How far away does the larger piece land? Neglect air resistance and effects due to the Earth’s curvature.
Relevant Equations
Momentum conserved
Kinematics equations
Hi,
Can anyone hint me if there is issue in the problem statement?
Consistent answer can be obtained if one presumes that the trajectory of center mass is parabolic.
Assuming this, the CM will land at distance L right to the axis of symmetry of parabola.
But the problem tells about a rocket, therefore first part of rocket movement is not free fall and thus the horizontal distance of falling after the top of trajectory is not necessarily L.
Is it deduction correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Michael Korobov said:
But the problem tells about a rocket, therefore first part of rocket movement is not free fall and thus the horizontal distance of falling after the top of trajectory is not necessarily L.
Is it deduction correct?
Yes, it is not necessarily L. That's why the scientist in charge was surprised when it landed there.
 
  • Haha
Likes Michael Korobov
  • #3
Michael Korobov said:
But the problem tells about a rocket, therefore first part of rocket movement is not free fall and thus the horizontal distance of falling after the top of trajectory is not necessarily L.
Is it deduction correct?
If we assume powered flight all the way to the top of the trajectory then we have, in principle, no way to know the horizontal velocity of the rocket just prior to the explosion.

It is possible, for instance, that the rocket reverses course, that the "explosion" is a mere fizzle and that both rocket pieces land together at the launch site.

Accordingly, one assumes, as you did in your solution, that the rocket burns out almost immediately after launch and then carries on in a parabolic free fall trajectory. Otherwise, there is no way to a solution.
 
  • #4
jbriggs444 said:
If we assume powered flight all the way to the top of the trajectory then we have, in principle, no way to know the horizontal velocity of the rocket just prior to the explosion.

It is possible, for instance, that the rocket reverses course, that the "explosion" is a mere fizzle and that both rocket pieces land together at the launch site.

Accordingly, one assumes, as you did in your solution, that the rocket burns out almost immediately after launch and then carries on in a parabolic free fall trajectory. Otherwise, there is no way to a solution.
Indeed, this was the only way to get consistent solution.
Thanks!
 

FAQ: Failed rocket problem (momentum conservation, Kleppner 4-4)

What is the "Failed rocket problem" in physics?

The "Failed rocket problem" is a conceptual physics problem that illustrates the principles of momentum conservation in a system involving a rocket that is supposed to expel fuel to generate thrust. The problem typically involves analyzing what happens when the rocket fails to expel fuel properly, leading to a scenario where momentum conservation principles must be applied to understand the resulting motion of the rocket.

How does momentum conservation apply to the failed rocket problem?

Momentum conservation states that in a closed system with no external forces, the total momentum before an event must equal the total momentum after the event. In the failed rocket problem, if the rocket does not expel fuel, the change in momentum of the rocket must be analyzed without the contribution of expelled fuel. The rocket's momentum will remain constant unless acted upon by an external force.

What assumptions are made in the failed rocket problem?

Key assumptions in the failed rocket problem include: the system is closed (no external forces acting), the rocket has a certain mass, and that the fuel is initially at rest relative to the rocket. Additionally, it is assumed that the rocket's propulsion system is designed to expel fuel, but in this case, it fails to do so, leading to a different analysis of motion and momentum.

What happens to the rocket if it fails to expel fuel?

If the rocket fails to expel fuel, it will not generate the thrust required to change its momentum. As a result, the rocket will continue to move at its initial velocity due to inertia, adhering to Newton's first law of motion. The momentum of the rocket remains constant, as there is no change in mass or external forces acting on it.

How can the failed rocket problem be used to teach physics concepts?

The failed rocket problem serves as an effective teaching tool for illustrating key physics concepts such as momentum conservation, Newton's laws of motion, and the relationship between mass and velocity. By analyzing scenarios where the expected outcomes (like thrust generation) do not occur, students can better understand the underlying principles of mechanics and the importance of external forces in motion.

Similar threads

Back
Top