Faraday's Law and a metal loop

In summary, the maximum induced EMF in the cut loop will be the same as in the uncut loop, but the maximum induced current in the uncut loop will be higher due to the lower resistance compared to the cut loop.
  • #1
robera1
22
0

Homework Statement


A metal loop is attached to an axle with a handle as shown. The north pole of a magnet is placed blow the loop and handle turned so that the looks rotates counterclockwise at a constant angular speed.

Suppose the loop (the one above) were replaced by a second loop that is identical to the first except for a small cut in it. The loop is rotated as before.
1. How does the maximum induced emf in the uncut loop compare to the maximum induced emf in the cut loop?
2. How does the maximum induced current in the uncut loop compare to the maximum induced current in the cut loop?


Homework Equations


This question is conceptual


The Attempt at a Solution


Well, for #2 I think that the maximum induced current in the cut loop will be smaller than in the uncut loop, because in the uncut loop the current continuously moves around the loop. This does not happen in the cut loop.
But as for #1, I don't really know how to relate current to emf.

Any suggestions on what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
robera1 said:

Homework Statement


A metal loop is attached to an axle with a handle as shown. The north pole of a magnet is placed blow the loop and handle turned so that the looks rotates counterclockwise at a constant angular speed.

Suppose the loop (the one above) were replaced by a second loop that is identical to the first except for a small cut in it. The loop is rotated as before.
1. How does the maximum induced emf in the uncut loop compare to the maximum induced emf in the cut loop?
2. How does the maximum induced current in the uncut loop compare to the maximum induced current in the cut loop?

Homework Equations


This question is conceptual

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, for #2 I think that the maximum induced current in the cut loop will be smaller than in the uncut loop, because in the uncut loop the current continuously moves around the loop. This does not happen in the cut loop.
But as for #1, I don't really know how to relate current to emf.

Any suggestions on what to do?

Faraday's Law says that the line integral of electric field (i.e. voltage potential) around a loop is equal to the negative rate of change of flux penetrating the area bounded by the loop (EMF due to flux change). The voltage potential will be the resistance of the loop times the current in the loop. However, the EMF due to flux change is the same in both cases. You correctly noted that the current is very small for the cut loop. The current in the uncut loop is very high since the conductor resistance is small. So basically, the EMF is the same in both cases and since EMF is equal to the potential, the current is low in once case (high resistance) and the current is high in the other case (low resistance). Basically, the cut wire acts like a perfect conductor with a very high resistance in the gap. So the potential in directly across the gap. The uncut wire has the potential drop is a distributed way across the whole wire.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


You are correct in your understanding of the induced current in the cut loop being smaller than in the uncut loop. This is due to the interruption of the continuous flow of current caused by the cut in the loop.

As for the relationship between current and emf, this is described by Faraday's Law of Induction, which states that the magnitude of the induced emf is directly proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through a surface bounded by the loop. In this case, the magnetic flux through the uncut loop is larger than the cut loop due to the continuous flow of current. Therefore, the maximum induced emf in the uncut loop will be larger than in the cut loop.

To better understand this concept, it may be helpful to think about the loop as a coil of wire. In the uncut loop, the coil is continuous and therefore has a larger surface area for the magnetic flux to pass through, resulting in a larger induced emf. In the cut loop, the coil is broken and has a smaller surface area for the magnetic flux to pass through, resulting in a smaller induced emf.

I hope this helps clarify the relationship between current and emf in Faraday's Law for you.
 

FAQ: Faraday's Law and a metal loop

What is Faraday's Law?

Faraday's Law is a fundamental principle in electromagnetism that states that the induced electromotive force (EMF) in a closed loop is directly proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the loop.

How does Faraday's Law apply to a metal loop?

In the context of a metal loop, Faraday's Law states that when a magnetic field is applied to the loop, an induced current will flow through the loop. The magnitude of this current is determined by the rate of change of the magnetic field.

What is the significance of Faraday's Law?

Faraday's Law is a crucial principle in understanding the relationship between electricity and magnetism. It has numerous practical applications, including power generation, electric motors, and transformers.

How is Faraday's Law related to Lenz's Law?

Lenz's Law is a consequence of Faraday's Law and states that the direction of the induced current in a closed loop is always such that it opposes the change in magnetic flux that caused it.

Can Faraday's Law be applied to non-metallic materials?

Yes, Faraday's Law can be applied to any material, as long as it is capable of conducting electricity. This includes both metallic and non-metallic materials.

Back
Top