What Are Feynman Diagrams and How Are They Used in Physics?

In summary, the Feynman diagrams provided in the conversation do not correctly represent the given processes due to violations of the rules for drawing such diagrams. The first diagram (a) has the wrong direction for the incoming positron, violating the rule that fermion lines never change direction. The second diagram (b) violates this rule as well, and also has an incorrect process. Diagram (c) violates the rule that only certain vertices are allowed, and does not have any external muons. Diagram (d) violates momentum conservation and must be amended with an additional external photon to represent the borrowing of momentum from the background. Diagram (e) is correct, but there are other possible diagrams that could represent the same process. It is important to
  • #1
unscientific
1,734
13

Homework Statement



(a) e- + e+ -> e- + e+
(b) e- + e- -> e- + e-
c) e- + e- -> e- + e- + u+ + u-
d) y -> e+ + e-
e) y + y -> y + y

xlxikm.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)[/B]
118j9yp.png


Part (b)

rcslmb.png


Part (c)

dc36l1.png


Part (d)

123pmjs.png


Part (e)

Not sure what to do with this, since usually the squiggly lines serve as the 'internal line' or 'virtual particle'.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
None of them are correct. The first one has the wrong direction on the fermion flow of the incoming positron. In the others you either have the wrong process (b) or vertices that do not exist in QED (c) or the process is not happening in the presence of matter as stated (d).
 
  • #3
Orodruin said:
None of them are correct. The first one has the wrong direction on the fermion flow of the incoming positron. In the others you either have the wrong process (b) or vertices that do not exist in QED (c) or the process is not happening in the presence of matter as stated (d).

My notes don't really explain how these diagrams are drawn and my course doesn't delve into too much detail as it is left for grad work.

Why does the positron in the first one have the wrong direction? I thought as an anti-particle it is traveling in the opposite direction?

What are the "rules" that tell us how to draw these diagrams?
 
  • #4
unscientific said:
What are the "rules" that tell us how to draw these diagrams?

  1. Fermion lines never change direction (caveat: not in the Standard Model anyway)
  2. The only allowed vertex is the one you have in (b) and (d). (For all flavours of leptons.)
  3. External fermion lines are particles if the arrow points in the "right" direction, i.e., into the diagram if incoming and out of the diagram if it is outgoing. Otherwise it is an anti-particle. (In your (a), the incoming positron points into the diagram, it should be pointing out.)
 
  • #5
Orodruin said:
  1. Fermion lines never change direction (caveat: not in the Standard Model anyway)
  2. The only allowed vertex is the one you have in (b) and (d). (For all flavours of leptons.)
  3. External fermion lines are particles if the arrow points in the "right" direction, i.e., into the diagram if incoming and out of the diagram if it is outgoing. Otherwise it is an anti-particle. (In your (a), the incoming positron points into the diagram, it should be pointing out.)

Thanks a lot for clarifying the rules, that was very helpful. I've updated the diagrams to be:

Part(a)

2rfg1hl.png


Part (b)


dzfcs0.png


Part (c)

2nas0ex.png




Part (d)

What do they mean by in the presence of matter?

Part (e)
fun814.png
 
  • #6
(b) now violates rule 1. The fermion line must keep its direction after the vertex.

(c) violates rule 2. You cannot have a vertex with only a fermion line and a photon line attached. Additionally, you have no external muons. You can remedy both of these errors in the same way.

(d) the reaction cannot happen in vacuum because of momentum conservation. In order for momentum conservation to hold, some momentum must be taken from a nearby electromagnetic field due to the presence of background matter.

(a) and (e) are ok.
 
  • #7
Orodruin said:
(b) now violates rule 1. The fermion line must keep its direction after the vertex.

(c) violates rule 2. You cannot have a vertex with only a fermion line and a photon line attached. Additionally, you have no external muons. You can remedy both of these errors in the same way.

(d) the reaction cannot happen in vacuum because of momentum conservation. In order for momentum conservation to hold, some momentum must be taken from a nearby electromagnetic field due to the presence of background matter.

(a) and (e) are ok.
Part (b)

feynman3.png


Part (c)

I'm not sure how to do this, but I am guessing:

feynman4.png


Part(d)

I'm not sure how to reflect this 'borrowing' of momentum in the diagram. Does it mean creating another virtual particle? So 2 squiggly lines to a vertex then branches out to e- and e+?


 
  • #8
(b) You cannot change it by just changing the arrow. While it did become a valid Feynman diagram, it no longer represents two ingoing electrons. When you changed direction of the line, you traded the electron for a positron.

(c) No. Stop guessing and think about it for some time. There is no vertex with three photons so it violates the rule about the only possible vertex. Make sure to check all rules!

(d) It would be represented by an external photon taken from the external field. This is typically represented by a photon line ending in a point with a cross.
 
  • #9
Orodruin said:
(b) You cannot change it by just changing the arrow. While it did become a valid Feynman diagram, it no longer represents two ingoing electrons. When you changed direction of the line, you traded the electron for a positron.

(c) No. Stop guessing and think about it for some time. There is no vertex with three photons so it violates the rule about the only possible vertex. Make sure to check all rules!

(d) It would be represented by an external photon taken from the external field. This is typically represented by a photon line ending in a point with a cross.
Part (b)

This represents an electron-electron scattering process, not sure what's wrong with this:

feynman3.png


Part (c)

Not sure if this is right, but I obeyed the 'one squiggly-two straight lines rule':

feynman4.png


Part (d)

feynman5.png
 
  • #10
(b) and (c) are correct. Note that there are also more possibilities for (c) that are different from this one. (This also goes for (a).)

On (d) you misunderstood me. You must add an additional external photon. It is in the end of this photon you put a cross, not in a vertex. This represents that the photon is taken from the background.
 
  • #11
Orodruin said:
(b) and (c) are correct. Note that there are also more possibilities for (c) that are different from this one. (This also goes for (a).)

On (d) you misunderstood me. You must add an additional external photon. It is in the end of this photon you put a cross, not in a vertex. This represents that the photon is taken from the background.

So part (d) is:

feynman5.png
 
  • #12
No, as I said, the cross is in the free end of the additional photon, not in the vertex. This represents taking it from the external field.

Squiggly external lines represent internal photon propagators or external photons. There is nothing intrinsically linking them to being virtual. Fermions can also be virtual and internal lines.

To be honest, I do not see the point of trying to make students trying to randomly draw Feynman diagrams without telling them at least the very basics of what they represent ...
 
  • Like
Likes unscientific

FAQ: What Are Feynman Diagrams and How Are They Used in Physics?

What are Feynman Diagrams?

Feynman Diagrams are graphical representations of particle interactions in quantum field theory. They were developed by physicist Richard Feynman in the 1940s as a way to visualize and calculate the probabilities of different particle interactions.

Why are Feynman Diagrams useful?

Feynman Diagrams provide a visual representation of complex particle interactions, making it easier for scientists to calculate and understand the probabilities of these interactions. They also allow for the calculation of scattering amplitudes, which are used to determine the likelihood of a particle scattering off another particle.

How do you read a Feynman Diagram?

Feynman Diagrams consist of lines and vertices, each representing different particles and their interactions. The lines represent the particles involved in the interaction, while the vertices represent the points where the particles interact. The direction of the arrows on the lines indicate the direction of the particle's movement in time.

What is the purpose of using Feynman Diagrams?

The main purpose of Feynman Diagrams is to calculate the probabilities of particle interactions in quantum field theory. They also provide a visual representation of these interactions, making it easier for scientists to understand and analyze complex processes.

Are Feynman Diagrams accurate representations of particle interactions?

While Feynman Diagrams are incredibly useful tools, they are not completely accurate representations of particle interactions. They are based on mathematical models and approximations, and do not take into account all possible interactions and factors. However, they are still a valuable tool for understanding and calculating particle interactions in quantum field theory.

Similar threads

Feynman diagram for ##\mu^+\mu^-## production in ##p\bar{p}## reaction
Replies
1
Views
1K
Tree-level diagram Moller scattering
Replies
3
Views
2K
What Are the Feynman Rules for Bremsstrahlung with Vector Particle Production?
Replies
1
Views
2K
How to translate expression into momentum-space correctly
Replies
1
Views
1K
Understanding e+e- --> W+W- Process Diagrams
Replies
3
Views
2K
How Do You Draw Feynman Diagrams for These Particle Reactions?
Replies
14
Views
8K
Feynman diagram; ##\pi^0+\pi^0\rightarrow \pi^++\pi^-##
Replies
1
Views
3K
Feynman Diagrams for Interacting Scalar Fields
Replies
2
Views
2K
Feynman Diagram for phi^4 theory (path integral)
Replies
2
Views
3K
Isospin and Partons model in a pentaquark
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top