Fictitious forces on a rigid body

In summary, the centrifugal force on the bob is not affected by the motion of the rod, and can be determined by using Newtonian Mechanics.
  • #1
chris25
6
0
Homework Statement
A pendulum is designed for use on a gravity-free spacecraft. The pendulum consists of a mass at the end of a rod of length l. The pivot at the other end of the rod is forced to move in a circle of radius R with angular frequency ω. Let θ be the angle the rod makes with the radial direction. Show this system behaves exactly like a pendulum of length l in a uniform gravitational field g = ω𝑅^2. That is, show that θ(t) is a solution for one system if and only if it is for the other.
Relevant Equations
F=wR^2
I was confused by how to work this problem in a rotating frame. The solution read that the centrifugal force on the mass should be of magnitude 𝑚𝑤𝑅^2. However, I thought it would be 𝑚𝑤𝐿^2 where L is the distance between the mass and the center of the circle (L = l + R). What am I missing here?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2023-01-22 at 3.55.53 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2023-01-22 at 3.55.53 PM.png
    3.5 KB · Views: 88
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think you need to make some approximations based on assuming that ##R \gg l##. I don't like it that they said "behaves exactly like..."
 
  • #3
TSny said:
I think you need to make some approximations based on assuming that ##R \gg l##. I don't like it that they said "behaves exactly like..."
If that diagram came with the question, it does not intend ##R \gg l##.
 
  • #4
haruspex said:
If that diagram came with the question, it does not intend ##R \gg l##.
Do you have any idea why the solution is what it is?
 
  • #5
haruspex said:
If that diagram came with the question, it does not intend ##R \gg l##.
Yes, thanks. I jumped the gun. It turns out that no approximations need to be made other than neglecting the Coriolis force.
[Edit: Actually, since the Coriolis force would act along the pendulum rod, it would only affect the tension in the rod. It would not affect the equation of motion for ##\theta##. So, I think there is an exact correspondence!]
 
Last edited:
  • #6
chris25 said:
Do you have any idea why the solution is what it is?
Have you studied how to get the equation of motion from a Lagrangian?
 
  • #7
TSny said:
Have you studied how to get the equation of motion from a Lagrangian?
Not yet, I've only studied newtonian mechanics
 
  • #8
OK. You can just use Newtonian mechanics.

Let ##r## be the instantaneous distance from the center of the circle of radius ##R## to the pendulum bob. How would you express the centrifugal force ##F_c## on the bob in terms of ##r##? Use some trigonometry to find the component of ##F_c## along the tangent of the circle of radius ##l## that the bob moves along. Nice simplification occurs.
 
  • #9
chris25 said:
Not yet, I've only studied newtonian mechanics
In Newtonian Mechanics, have you learned about expressing Newton's 2nd law of motion as reckoned from an accelerating frame of reference?
 
  • #10
chris25 said:
Homework Statement:: A pendulum is designed for use on a gravity-free spacecraft. The pendulum consists of a mass at the end of a rod of length l. The pivot at the other end of the rod is forced to move in a circle of radius R with angular frequency ω. Let θ be the angle the rod makes with the radial direction. Show this system behaves exactly like a pendulum of length l in a uniform gravitational field g = ω𝑅^2. That is, show that θ(t) is a solution for one system if and only if it is for the other.
Relevant Equations:: F=wR^2

I was confused by how to work this problem in a rotating frame. The solution read that the centrifugal force on the mass should be of magnitude 𝑚𝑤𝑅^2. However, I thought it would be 𝑚𝑤𝐿^2 where L is the distance between the mass and the center of the circle (L = l + R). What am I missing here?
The centrifugal force on the bob is in the radial direction from the center of rotation of the rod, and is given by ##m\omega^2 \bf{L}##. So the centrifugal force is not that produced by a uniform gravitational field. You need to determine the component of this force in the theta direction of the bob motion (see figure). When you complete the analysis, the motion will be the same as if the rod were not rotating and the bob were in a uniform gravitational field of magnitude ##g=\omega^2R##.
 

FAQ: Fictitious forces on a rigid body

What are fictitious forces?

Fictitious forces, also known as inertial forces or pseudo-forces, are apparent forces that arise when an observer is in a non-inertial (accelerating) reference frame. These forces do not arise from any physical interaction but are perceived due to the acceleration of the reference frame itself.

How do fictitious forces affect a rigid body in motion?

When a rigid body is observed from a non-inertial reference frame, fictitious forces must be introduced to account for the body's motion. These forces can affect the body's apparent acceleration, trajectory, and equilibrium. For example, in a rotating reference frame, a rigid body may experience centrifugal force and Coriolis force, which can alter its motion and stability.

What are some common examples of fictitious forces?

Common examples of fictitious forces include the centrifugal force, which appears to push objects outward in a rotating reference frame, and the Coriolis force, which acts on objects moving within a rotating system. Another example is the Euler force, which occurs in a reference frame with changing rotational speed.

How are fictitious forces calculated?

Fictitious forces are calculated based on the acceleration of the non-inertial reference frame. For instance, the centrifugal force can be calculated as \( F_{\text{centrifugal}} = m \omega^2 r \), where \( m \) is the mass of the object, \( \omega \) is the angular velocity, and \( r \) is the distance from the axis of rotation. The Coriolis force is given by \( F_{\text{Coriolis}} = 2m (\mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{\omega}) \), where \( \mathbf{v} \) is the velocity of the object relative to the rotating frame.

Why are fictitious forces important in engineering and physics?

Fictitious forces are crucial in engineering and physics because they allow for the correct analysis of systems in non-inertial reference frames. Understanding and accounting for these forces are essential for the design and analysis of rotating machinery, vehicles, and structures subject to acceleration. They also play a significant role in meteorology, astrophysics, and various other fields where rotating or accelerating reference frames are commonly used.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
805
Replies
12
Views
635
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top