Field with rot = 0 but non conservative.

  • Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Field
In summary, Kleppner found that a function with the same problem as the one you are working on has a potential in a multiply-connected region that has a jump across an excluded half-plane.
  • #1
LCSphysicist
646
162
Homework Statement
I want to know what is the problem with this field and why it is not conservative.
Relevant Equations
The curl.
1601189002933.png
x and y are different than 0
As you can check, rot (del x F) is equal zero. Immediately someone could imagine this is a conservative field. But it is not, it is not path independent in certain occasions.
I just know one way, involving polygonal, but there is not another way to check if F is conservative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The curl is ##\vec{0}##, which means that you can express ##\vec{F} = -\nabla \phi## wherever ##\vec{F}## is defined, however you have a singularity at the origin ##(x,y) = (0,0)##. That means that any line integral around a closed curve that encloses the origin is not necessarily zero. If the closed curve does not enclose the singular point, then the line integral will be zero.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes vanhees71 and LCSphysicist
  • #3
etotheipi said:
The curl is ##\vec{0}##, which means that you can express ##\vec{F} = -\nabla \phi## wherever ##\vec{F}## is defined, however you have a singularity at the origin ##(x,y) = (0,0)##. That means that any line integral around a closed curve that encloses the origin is not necessarily zero. If the closed curve does not enclose the singular point, then the line integral will be zero.
You unearthed a quote from Kleppner that was I don’t know where in my brain, involving a function similar to this with the same problem lol! The brain is a bizarre thing, and thank you ;) This is a more logic way to evaluate the functions
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #4
The original field is defined on ##\mathbb{R}^2## with the ##3##-axis excluded. That's a multiply-connected region, i.e., you cannot shrink all closed curves continuously to a single point. Any closed curve with the ##z## axis intersecting all surfaces with this curve as a boundary cannot be contracted to a single point in a continuous way. Any other closed curve, however can.

You can easily show that in any open simply connected part of where a vector field is defined, which fulfills ##\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V}=0## has a potential, ##\vec{V}=-\vec{\nabla} \phi##, when restricted to this open simply-connected region.

In your case you can get a maximal such region, by just excluding not only the ##3##-axis from the domain of the vector field but an entire half-plane with the ##3##-axis as a boundary. You can find a unique potential in this restricted domain, but it will have a jump across the excluded half-plane by a constant ##2 \pi##.

It's a good excercise to do the calculation to find this kind of "muti-valued potential".

Hint: Work in cylinder coordinates with some arbitrary domain for ##\varphi \in [\alpha,\alpha+ 2 \pi[## with ##\alpha \in [-\pi,\pi]## arbitrary. Note that cylinder coordinates are singular along the ##3##-axis!
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi

FAQ: Field with rot = 0 but non conservative.

What is the meaning of "rot = 0 but non conservative" in a field?

In a vector field, "rot" refers to the curl or rotational component of the field. When the curl is equal to zero, it means that the field is irrotational or has no rotational component. However, the field can still be non-conservative, meaning that the work done by the field is path-dependent and does not follow the principles of conservative forces.

How can a field have a curl of 0 but still be non-conservative?

This can occur when the field is not conservative due to the presence of non-conservative forces, such as friction or air resistance, which cause energy to be lost as the object moves through the field. These forces do not have a curl component, but they still affect the work done by the field.

What is an example of a field with rot = 0 but non conservative?

An example of this could be a gravitational field near the surface of the Earth. While the curl of the field is zero, the work done by the field is not path-independent due to the presence of air resistance and other non-conservative forces.

How is the concept of "rot = 0 but non conservative" relevant in physics?

Understanding the difference between conservative and non-conservative fields is important in many areas of physics, such as mechanics and electromagnetism. It helps explain the behavior of objects in different types of fields and how energy is transferred and conserved.

Can a field have a non-zero curl and still be conservative?

No, a field cannot have a non-zero curl and be conservative. The curl is a necessary condition for a field to be non-conservative. If the curl is zero, the field is conservative, but if the curl is non-zero, the field is non-conservative.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top