- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 13 - Field Theory.
I am currently studying Theorem 3 [pages 512 - 513]
I need some help with an aspect the proof of Theorem 3 ... ...
Theorem 3 on pages 512-513 reads as follows:
View attachment 6580
View attachment 6581
In the above text from Dummit and Foote, we read the following:
" ... ... We identify \(\displaystyle F\) with its isomorphic image in \(\displaystyle K\) and view \(\displaystyle F\) as a subfield of \(\displaystyle K\). If \(\displaystyle \overline{x} = \pi (x)\) denotes the image of \(\displaystyle x\) in the quotient \(\displaystyle K\), then
\(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }\) ... ... (since \(\displaystyle \pi\) is a homomorphism)
... ... "My question is as follows: ... where in the proof of \(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }\) does it depend on \(\displaystyle \pi\) being a homomorphism ...
... indeed, how does one formally and rigorously demonstrate that \(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }\) ... ... and how does this proof depend on \(\displaystyle \pi\) being a homomorphism ...
To make my question clearer consider the case of \(\displaystyle p(x) = x^2 - 5\) ... ...
Then ...
\(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{x}^2 - 5_K \)
\(\displaystyle = ( x + ( p(x) ) ( x + ( p(x) ) - ( 5 + ( p(x) )\)
\(\displaystyle = ( x^2 + ( p(x) ) - ( 5 + ( p(x) )\)
\(\displaystyle = ( x^2 - 5 ) + ( p(x) ) = 0\)
\(\displaystyle = \overline{ p(x) } \)
... ... in the above case, my question is ... where does the above calculation depend on \(\displaystyle \pi\) being a homomorphism ... ?
Hope someone can help ...
Peter
I am currently studying Theorem 3 [pages 512 - 513]
I need some help with an aspect the proof of Theorem 3 ... ...
Theorem 3 on pages 512-513 reads as follows:
View attachment 6580
View attachment 6581
In the above text from Dummit and Foote, we read the following:
" ... ... We identify \(\displaystyle F\) with its isomorphic image in \(\displaystyle K\) and view \(\displaystyle F\) as a subfield of \(\displaystyle K\). If \(\displaystyle \overline{x} = \pi (x)\) denotes the image of \(\displaystyle x\) in the quotient \(\displaystyle K\), then
\(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }\) ... ... (since \(\displaystyle \pi\) is a homomorphism)
... ... "My question is as follows: ... where in the proof of \(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }\) does it depend on \(\displaystyle \pi\) being a homomorphism ...
... indeed, how does one formally and rigorously demonstrate that \(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{ p(x) }\) ... ... and how does this proof depend on \(\displaystyle \pi\) being a homomorphism ...
To make my question clearer consider the case of \(\displaystyle p(x) = x^2 - 5\) ... ...
Then ...
\(\displaystyle p( \overline{x} ) = \overline{x}^2 - 5_K \)
\(\displaystyle = ( x + ( p(x) ) ( x + ( p(x) ) - ( 5 + ( p(x) )\)
\(\displaystyle = ( x^2 + ( p(x) ) - ( 5 + ( p(x) )\)
\(\displaystyle = ( x^2 - 5 ) + ( p(x) ) = 0\)
\(\displaystyle = \overline{ p(x) } \)
... ... in the above case, my question is ... where does the above calculation depend on \(\displaystyle \pi\) being a homomorphism ... ?
Hope someone can help ...
Peter
Last edited: