Find a basis for U perp given U = {(3,-1,2),(2,0,-3)}

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
stunner5000pt
1,443
4
Find a basis for U perp given U = {(3,-1,2),(2,0,-3)}

to find U perp i have to find a vector such that it perpendicular to BOTH of those vectors up there
3x - 2y + 2z = 0
2x - 3z = 0

i get z = t
y = 13t/2
x = 2t
so the only basis for U perp is
{2t,13t/2,t}?? ALl values of t are simply multiples of each other anyway...
AM i right? Only one vector?

Also
If R^n = span\{X_{1},X_{2},...,X_{N}\} and X \bullet X_{i} = Y \bullet X_{i}
for all i, then show that X = Y


WEll all the Xi form an orthogonal basis right? So from the given condition couldn't we say
for n not i
X \bullet \left(\frac{X_{i} \bullet X_{1}}{||X_{1}||^2} X_{1} + ... + \frac{X_{i} \bullet X_{n}}{||X_{n}||^2} X_{n}\right)
and Y \bullet \left(\frac{X_{i} \bullet X_{1}}{||X_{1}||^2} X_{1} + ... + \frac{X_{i} \bullet X_{n}}{||X_{n}||^2} X_{n}\right)
since the two are equal.. and Xi dot X and Xi dot are all equal... then X must be same as Y
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Strictly speaking, {2t,13t/2,t} is not a basis for U perp, you have to pick some value for t. Also, you need to put your vector in brackets, otherwise this is just a set of 3 numbers, which has nothing to do with anything. So if you pick some non-zero t, then {(2t,13t/2,t)} is a basis for U perp.

How do you know the Xi form an orthogonal basis? And do you intend N to be the same as n? Anyways, you're overcomplicating things, and what you've written doesn't make sense, so I don't know how to help you. As a general tip, if you want to show two things are equal, a good way to do it is to show that their difference is 0. So as a start, consider the fact that since X.Xi = Y.Xi for all i, (X-Y).Xi = 0 for all i.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top