Find a closed form interpretation for the integral :

In summary, the integral $\displaystyle \int^{\infty}_0 \, \frac{\log (1+e^{ax})}{1+e^{bx}}\, dx $ can be rewritten as $\displaystyle \int^1_0 \, \frac{\log \left(t^{\frac{a}{b}}+1 \right)}{t+1}\, dt$, which may be solved using a power-series expansion or numerically if the values of $a$ and $b$ are known.
  • #1
alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
1,561
1
$\displaystyle \int^{\infty}_0 \, \frac{\log (1+e^{ax})}{1+e^{bx}}\, dx $​

I am not sure whether it can be solved :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know if there are any constraints on $b$ and $a$, but here's an idea or two:

1. Let $u=bx$. Let's assume $b>0$. Then you have $du=b\,dx$, and the integral becomes
$$ \frac{1}{b} \int_{0}^{ \infty} \frac{ \ln(1+e^{au/b})}{1+e^{u}}\,du.$$

Next, you can introduce symmetry where there isn't by factoring out, up top, a $e^{au/(2b)}$, which gets you
$$ \int= \frac{1}{b} \int_{0}^{ \infty} \frac{ \ln(e^{au/(2b)}(e^{-au/(2b)}+e^{au/(2b)}))}{e^{u/2}(e^{-u/2}+e^{u/2})}\,du
= \frac{1}{b} \int_{0}^{ \infty} \frac{ (au/(2b))+\ln(e^{-au/(2b)}+e^{au/(2b)})}{e^{u/2}(e^{-u/2}+e^{u/2})}\,du$$
$$=\frac{1}{2b} \int_{0}^{ \infty} \frac{ (au/(2b))+ \ln(2 \cosh(au/(2b)))}{e^{u/2} \cosh(u/2)}\,du=\frac{1}{2b} \int_{0}^{ \infty} \frac{ (au/(2b))+ \ln(2)+ \ln( \cosh(au/(2b)))}{e^{u/2} \cosh(u/2)}\,du.$$
You could break that up into three integrals. The middle one is tractable, actually. The outer two are still problematic.

That's about as far as I can go. Perhaps someone else has other ideas? Or could run with these?

Naturally, if you know what $a$ and $b$ are, you could integrate numerically. I think the integrals will likely converge, as the original denominator will dominate the numerator significantly.
 
  • #3
Today I tried and got a reduced more promising to solve integral :

$\displaystyle \int^1_0 \, \frac{\log \left(t^{\frac{a}{b}}+1 \right)}{t+1}\, dt$

A power-series expansion looked for the first glance the first way to go ... :rolleyes:
 

FAQ: Find a closed form interpretation for the integral :

What is a closed form interpretation?

A closed form interpretation is a mathematical expression that can be written using a finite number of standard mathematical operations and functions. It does not involve numerical approximations or infinite sums.

Why is it important to find a closed form interpretation for an integral?

Finding a closed form interpretation for an integral allows us to express the integral in a simpler and more concise form, making it easier to understand and apply in other calculations. It also allows us to evaluate the integral analytically instead of relying on numerical methods.

What is the process for finding a closed form interpretation for an integral?

The process for finding a closed form interpretation for an integral involves using various techniques such as substitution, integration by parts, trigonometric identities, and special functions. It also requires a deep understanding of mathematical concepts and properties.

Are there some integrals that do not have a closed form interpretation?

Yes, there are some integrals that do not have a closed form interpretation. These are known as "unsolvable" or "non-elementary" integrals. They cannot be expressed using standard mathematical operations and functions and often require advanced techniques or numerical methods to evaluate.

Can a closed form interpretation be verified?

Yes, a closed form interpretation can be verified by differentiating it and confirming that the result is equivalent to the original integral. This process is known as the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" and is a way to check the correctness of the closed form interpretation.

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
781
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top