MHB Find a countable set that is also open

  • Thread starter Thread starter seacoast123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
AI Thread Summary
No countable subset of the real line can be open. The argument begins by assuming a countable open set C exists in the real numbers and selecting any point x from C. For x, there exists a delta such that the interval (x - delta, x + delta) is entirely contained within C. However, this interval is uncountable, leading to the conclusion that C cannot be countable. Thus, a countable open set in the real line cannot exist.
seacoast123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Find a countable set that is also open or prove that one cannot exist
 
Physics news on Phys.org
seacoast123 said:
Find a countable set that is also open or prove that one cannot exist
No countable subset of the real line is open. To prove it, assume $C$ is a countable open subset of $\mathbb R$ and $x$ be any point in $C$.

Then there exists $\delta>0$ such that $(x-\delta,x+\delta)\subseteq C$.

But $(x-\delta,x+\delta)$ is uncountable (why?).

Hence $C$ cannot be countable.
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top