Find coordinates of f′, f′′, f′′′ in the basis

In summary: Perfect!I can see that this is a faster method but would it also work if I expanded the factors into polynomials and put them in matrix form in a 6x7 matrix with column 7 the f(x)=x^5-5x^4 in matrix form? The only difference is that in the first method, we used the fact that $f$ is a polynomial of degree 5 to determine that $a_6 = 0$. In the second method, you would have to use Gaussian elimination to determine that $a_6 = 0$. So in theory, it would work, but it would take more computation.
  • #1
Logan Land
84
0
Consider the polynomial f(x) = x^5 − 5x^4.

(a) Find coordinates of f′, f′′, f′′′ in the basis {1, x, x2, x3, x4, x5}

I no f ' = 5x^4-20x^3
f " = 20x^3-60x^2
and f "' = 60x^2-120x

but from there where to begin?

do I make a matrix of like the following?

1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 -20
0 0 0 0 1 0 5
0 0 0 0 0 1 0

cause that is already in reduced form.

Just a little confused on where to start after find f ' , f " , and f '''
unless the coordinate vector is just
(0,0,0,-20,5,0) for f ' ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
LLand314 said:
unless the coordinate vector is just
(0,0,0,-20,5,0) for f ' ?

Yes, that's right. So how would you write the coordinates of $f''$ and $f'''$, knowing that $f''(x) = 20x^3 - 60x^2$ and $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$?
 
  • #3
Euge said:
Yes, that's right. So how would you write the coordinates of $f''$ and $f'''$, knowing that $f''(x) = 20x^3 - 60x^2$ and $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$?

f '' = (0,0,-60,20,0,0)?
f ''' = (0,-120,60,0,0,0)?

Hope that's correct

-----------------

If my basis was
{1,(x−1),(x−1)^2,(x−1)^3,(x−1)^4,(x−1)^5}

would I expand the factors and create a matrix with the f, f ' , f '' in the last column and solve to get the coordinates for each f, f ' and f ''?
 
  • #4
LLand314 said:
f '' = (0,0,-60,20,0,0)?
f ''' = (0,-120,60,0,0,0)?

Hope that's correct

Yes, that's right.

LLand314 said:
If my basis was
{1,(x−1),(x−1)^2,(x−1)^3,(x−1)^4,(x−1)^5}

would I expand the factors and create a matrix with the f, f ' , f '' in the last column and solve to get the coordinates for each f, f ' and f ''?

The coefficients of the Taylor series of $f$ at $x = 1$ are $a_n = \frac{f^{(n)}(1)}{n!}$, for all integers $n \ge 0$. Since $f$ is a polynomial of degree 5, $a_n = 0$ for $n > 5$. So the coordinates of $f$ relative to your new basis is $(a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5)$. Find the values of these $a_n$. Apply this method to $f'$ and $f''$ to find their coordinates.
 
  • #5
Euge said:
Yes, that's right.
The coefficients of the Taylor series of $f$ at $x = 1$ are $a_n = \frac{f^{(n)}(1)}{n!}$, for all integers $n \ge 0$. Since $f$ is a polynomial of degree 5, $a_n = 0$ for $n > 5$. So the coordinates of $f$ relative to your new basis is $(a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5)$. Find the values of these $a_n$. Apply this method to $f'$ and $f''$ to find their coordinates.

So my $a_1 = \frac{1^{(1)}(1)}{1!}$ is the answer to this? Sorry that confused me a little. Our teach never mentioned that.
 
  • #6
The symbol $f^{(n)}$ means the $n$th derivative of $f$. When $n = 0$, $f^{(n)} = f$.
 
  • #7
Euge said:
The symbol $f^{(n)}$ means the $n$th derivative of $f$. When $n = 0$, $f^{(n)} = f$.

How do I put that into that equation when there's 2 values of x powers, x^5 and x^4 or do I do each separately?
Could I see an example possibility?

Thanks
 
  • #8
LLand314 said:
How do I put that into that equation when there's 2 values of x powers, x^5 and x^4 or do I do each separately?
Could I see an example possibility?

Thanks

We have

\(\displaystyle a_0 = f(1) = 1 - 5 = -4\)

\(\displaystyle a_1 = f'(1) = 5 - 20 = -15\)

\(\displaystyle a_2 = \frac{f''(2)}{2} = \frac{20 - 60}{2} = -20\)

Since $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$, $f'''(1) = 60 - 120 = -60$ and thus

\(\displaystyle a_3 = \frac{f'''(1)}{6} = -10\)

Can you compute $a_4$ and $a_5$?
 
  • #9
Euge said:
We have

\(\displaystyle a_0 = f(1) = 1 - 5 = -4\)

\(\displaystyle a_1 = f'(1) = 5 - 20 = -15\)

\(\displaystyle a_2 = \frac{f''(2)}{2} = \frac{20 - 60}{2} = -20\)

Since $f'''(x) = 60x^2 - 120x$, $f'''(1) = 60 - 120 = -60$ and thus

\(\displaystyle a_3 = \frac{f'''(1)}{6} = -10\)

Can you compute $a_4$ and $a_5$?

Would a4 be 0? Since we have (120x-120)/24 or 0/24 =0?

And

A5= 120/120 or 1?
 
  • #10
LLand314 said:
Would a4 be 0? Since we have (120x-120)/24 or 0/24 =0?

And

A5= 120/120 or 1?

Yes, $a_4 = 0$ and $a_5 = 1$. So what are the coordinates of $f$?
 
  • #11
Euge said:
Yes, $a_4 = 0$ and $a_5 = 1$. So what are the coordinates of $f$?

(-4,-15,-20,-10,0,1)??
 
  • #12
LLand314 said:
(-4,-15,-20,-10,0,1)??

Excellent! :)
 
  • #13
Euge said:
Excellent! :)

If that's the coordinates for f then how do I get f' and f" coordinates if i used derivatives of f to get f coordinates?
 
  • #14
LLand314 said:
If that's the coordinates for f then how do I get f' and f" coordinates if i used derivatives of f to get f coordinates?

or do I start with f ' as a0 then go from there to obtain the coordinates for f'?

and for f '' start with f '' as a0 then go from there to obtain the coordinates for f ''?
 
  • #15
LLand314 said:
If that's the coordinates for f then how do I get f' and f" coordinates if i used derivatives of f to get f coordinates?

Now you know that

\(\displaystyle f(x) = -4 - 15(x - 1) - 20(x - 1)^2 - 10(x - 1)^3 + (x - 1)^5.\)

Differentiate this equation, using the property $\frac{d}{dx}(x - 1)^n = n(x - 1)^{n-1}$ (which follows from the chain rule):

\(\displaystyle f'(x) = -15 - 40(x - 1) - 30(x - 1)^2 + 5(x - 1)^4.\)

So $(-15, -40, -30, 0, 5, 0)$ make the coordinates for $f'$. Using the same method you can find the coordinates for $f''$.
 
  • #16
Euge said:
Now you know that

\(\displaystyle f(x) = -4 - 15(x - 1) - 20(x - 1)^2 - 10(x - 1)^3 + (x - 1)^5.\)

Differentiate this equation, using the property $\frac{d}{dx}(x - 1)^n = n(x - 1)^{n-1}$ (which follows from the chain rule):

\(\displaystyle f'(x) = -15 - 40(x - 1) - 30(x - 1)^2 + 5(x - 1)^4.\)

So $(-15, -40, -30, 0, 5, 0)$ make the coordinates for $f'$. Using the same method you can find the coordinates for $f''$.
so in this case would f '' be (-40,-60,0,20,0,0)?
 
  • #17
LLand314 said:
so in this case would f '' be (-40,-60,0,20,0,0)?

Correct!
 
  • #18
Euge said:
Correct!

Perfect!

I can see that this is a faster method but would it also work if I expanded the factors into polynomials and put them in matrix form in a 6x7 matrix with column 7 the f(x)=x^5-5x^4 in matrix form?

The only reason I ask is in case its not a taylor series for my basis.
 
  • #19
LLand314 said:
Perfect!

I can see that this is a faster method but would it also work if I expanded the factors into polynomials and put them in matrix form in a 6x7 matrix with column 7 the f(x)=x^5-5x^4 in matrix form?

The only reason I ask is in case its not a taylor series for my basis.

Which factors? You mean the powers of $x - 1$?

I can understand if you wrote the coordinates of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ separately as column vectors (which would give the coordinate matrices of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ relative to your new basis). However, I don't see why you would be put them in a $6\times 7$ matrix.
 
  • #20
Euge said:
Which factors? You mean the powers of $x - 1$?

I can understand if you wrote the coordinates of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ separately as column vectors (which would give the coordinate matrices of $f$, $f'$, and $f''$ relative to your new basis). However, I don't see why you would be put them in a $6\times 7$ matrix.

yes the factors of (x-1)^n

as in

1 -1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
for vectors (1, x-1)
and so on...

- - - Updated - - -

View attachment 3441
like this

where each column is the factor expanded into a polynomial and b is the function and them perform row reduction, would that still give the same answers?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-23 at 4.54.20 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-10-23 at 4.54.20 PM.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 60
  • #21
LLand314 said:
yes the factors of (x-1)^n

as in

1 -1
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
for vectors (1, x-1)
and so on...

- - - Updated - - -

View attachment 3441
like this

where each column is the factor expanded into a polynomial and b is the function and them perform row reduction, would that still give the same answers?

No, you don't want to do that. Stick with the Taylor method or use the binomial theorem with the identity $x = (x - 1) + 1$ to obtain coordinate matrices for $f$, $f'$, and $f''$.
 

FAQ: Find coordinates of f′, f′′, f′′′ in the basis

What are the coordinates of f′ in the given basis?

The coordinates of f′ in the given basis represent the values of the derivative function at each point in the basis. These coordinates can be found by taking the derivative of the original function and plugging in the values of the basis points.

How do I find the coordinates of f′′ in the given basis?

To find the coordinates of f′′ in the given basis, you will need to take the second derivative of the original function and then plug in the values of the basis points. This will give you the coordinates of the second derivative function at each point in the basis.

Can I find the coordinates of f′′′ in any basis?

Yes, you can find the coordinates of f′′′ in any basis as long as the basis is a set of linearly independent functions. This means that the functions in the basis cannot be written as a linear combination of each other.

How do I represent the coordinates of f′ in vector form?

The coordinates of f′ in vector form can be represented as a column vector with the values of the derivative function at each basis point. The length of this vector will depend on the number of basis points given.

What is the significance of finding the coordinates of f′, f′′, and f′′′ in the given basis?

Finding the coordinates of these derivatives in a given basis allows us to represent the original function as a combination of the basis functions. This can be useful in solving problems or understanding the behavior of the original function at different points in the basis.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
978
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top