Find dissipative function for the non-linear force f=-bv^n

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the dissipative function for the non-linear force f = -bv^n in a Lagrangian framework. It is established that the dissipative function can be expressed as D = - (1/(n+1))bv^(1+n). There is clarification regarding the relationship between the force and the dissipative function, correcting a typo in the initial query. Participants confirm the correctness of the derived dissipative function. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately relating force and dissipative functions in nonconservative systems.
mcconnellmelany
Messages
21
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
For a nonconservative force,
What would be the dissipative function for a force f=-bvⁿ in Lagrangian
(Where v is the velocity)
[#qoute for a nonconservative force f=-bv
The dissipative function is D=-(1/2)bv² ]
Relevant Equations
##\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x})=\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}##
For a nonconservative force,
What would be the dissipative function for a force f=-bvⁿ in Lagrangian
(Where v is the velocity)
[#qoute for a nonconservative force f=-bv
The dissipative function is D=-(1/2)bv² ]

Since ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \dot x}## so the dissipative function should be ##D=-\frac{1}{n+1}bv^{1+n}##, isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mcconnellmelany said:
Since ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \ddot x}##
Do you mean ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \dot x}## ?
 
haruspex said:
Do you mean ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \dot x}## ?
Hmm! It was a typo.
 
mcconnellmelany said:
Hmm! It was a typo.
Your answer looks right to me.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top