MHB Find Glass Thickness to Block 25% of Light in Sunglasses

AI Thread Summary
To determine the glass thickness needed to block 25% of light in sunglasses, the equation I(x) = I0 (0.8)^x is used, where I0 is the initial light intensity. Setting the equation to 75% of I0 leads to the equation 0.75 I0 = I0 (0.8)^x. Solving for x involves understanding logarithmic and exponential relationships. The discussion emphasizes the importance of logarithms in solving such equations. Ultimately, the focus is on finding the appropriate thickness of the glass to achieve the desired light blockage.
fxacx
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The intensity, I of light in lumens, passing through the glass of a pair of sunglasses is given by the
equation I(x) = I0 (0.8)^x , where x is the thickness of the glass in millimetres and I0 is the intensity of
light entering the glasses. How thick should the glass be so that it will block 25% of the light entering
the sunglasses?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
H
fxacx said:
The intensity, I of light in lumens, passing through the glass of a pair of sunglasses is given by the
equation I(x) = I0 (0.8)^x , where x is the thickness of the glass in millimetres and I0 is the intensity of
light entering the glasses. How thick should the glass be so that it will block 25% of the light entering
the sunglasses?

$0.75 I_0 = I_0 (0.8)^x$

solve for x ...
 
So the question is, again, do you know how to solve $a^x= y$? You titled this "Log/exponential word problem". Do you know what "logarithms" and "exponentials" are and how they are related?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top