Find Least Value of \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right|, |z| ≥ 3

  • Thread starter utkarshakash
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Value
So, in this case, I should first find the minimum value of |z| - 1/|z| and then show that the inequality is actually an equality for that particular value of z, right?Hmmm... that seems quite correct. Thanks a lot for pointing it out! So, in this case, I should first find the minimum value of |z| - 1/|z| and then show that the inequality is actually an equality for that particular value of z, right?Yes, that should work. Good luck!
  • #1
utkarshakash
Gold Member
854
13

Homework Statement


Least value of [itex] \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right| if |z|\geq3 is [/itex]


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


[itex] \left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right| [/itex]

So the minimum value will be

[itex]|z|- \frac{1}{|z|} [/itex]

Now for minimum value
|z| = 3 as it is the minimum value of |z|

Substituting the value of |z| I get
[itex]3- \frac{1}{3} [/itex]
=[itex] \frac{8}{3}[/itex]

But the correct answer is [itex] \frac{10}{3} [/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
utkarshakash said:

Homework Statement


Least value of [itex] \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right| if |z|\geq3 is [/itex]


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


[itex] \left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right| [/itex]

So the minimum value will be

[itex]|z|- \frac{1}{|z|} [/itex]

Now for minimum value
|z| = 3 as it is the minimum value of |z|

Substituting the value of |z| I get
[itex]3- \frac{1}{3} [/itex]
=[itex] \frac{8}{3}[/itex]

But the correct answer is [itex] \frac{10}{3} [/itex]

Your reasoning is wrong (or at least, incomplete---see below), but you have arrived at the correct answer. The minimum value is, indeed, 8/3, and the posted answer of 10/3 is incorrect. Hint: to show that 10/3 is incorrect, look for a value z = iy along the imaginary axis that gives z + 1/z = (8/3)i, so for that z we have |z + 1/z| = 8/3, which is less that the alleged minimum of 10/3.

So, what did you do wrong? Well, your inequality
[tex] \left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right| [/tex]
is, indeed, true, but for some z it might be a strict inequality, so there is no guarantee that minimizing the right-hand-side will give an achievable minimum to the left-hand-side. I'll leave it up to you to see what else needs to be done to fix the argument.

RGV
 
  • #3
Ray Vickson said:
Your reasoning is wrong (or at least, incomplete---see below), but you have arrived at the correct answer. The minimum value is, indeed, 8/3, and the posted answer of 10/3 is incorrect. Hint: to show that 10/3 is incorrect, look for a value z = iy along the imaginary axis that gives z + 1/z = (8/3)i, so for that z we have |z + 1/z| = 8/3, which is less that the alleged minimum of 10/3.

So, what did you do wrong? Well, your inequality
[tex] \left|z-\frac{-1}{z} \right| \geq |z|-\left| \frac{-1}{z} \right| [/tex]
is, indeed, true, but for some z it might be a strict inequality, so there is no guarantee that minimizing the right-hand-side will give an achievable minimum to the left-hand-side. I'll leave it up to you to see what else needs to be done to fix the argument.

RGV

I can't make out any fault in my reasoning. Can you please bring it out?
 
  • #4
utkarshakash said:
I can't make out any fault in my reasoning. Can you please bring it out?

I have already explained why your reasoning is incomplete: you have some expression A that you want to minimize, and you know that A ≥ B for some other expression B. Minimizing B does not necessarily minimize A.

For example, if f(x) = (x-1)2+ x4 and g(x) = (x-1)2, we certainly have f(x) ≥ g(x) for all x (and f = g for some x). However, the minimum of g(x) is = 0, and it occurs at x = 1, while the minimum of f(x) is = 0.2892734 and it occurs at x = 0.5897545 (as obtained using numerical methods). So, in this case, minimizing f by minimizing the simpler function g would fail. However, if I change f to f(x) = x2 + x4 and g(x) to g(x) = x2, we would get the correct answer by minimizing g instead of f.

So, sometimes your method works and sometimes it fails. The issue is whether you can apply it in your particular problem.

RGV
 
  • #5
Ray Vickson said:
I have already explained why your reasoning is incomplete: you have some expression A that you want to minimize, and you know that A ≥ B for some other expression B. Minimizing B does not necessarily minimize A.

For example, if f(x) = (x-1)2+ x4 and g(x) = (x-1)2, we certainly have f(x) ≥ g(x) for all x (and f = g for some x). However, the minimum of g(x) is = 0, and it occurs at x = 1, while the minimum of f(x) is = 0.2892734 and it occurs at x = 0.5897545 (as obtained using numerical methods). So, in this case, minimizing f by minimizing the simpler function g would fail. However, if I change f to f(x) = x2 + x4 and g(x) to g(x) = x2, we would get the correct answer by minimizing g instead of f.

So, sometimes your method works and sometimes it fails. The issue is whether you can apply it in your particular problem.

RGV

Hmmm... that seems quite correct. Thanks
 

FAQ: Find Least Value of \left|z+\frac{1}{z}\right|, |z| ≥ 3

What is the significance of the absolute value in the expression |z+1/z|?

The absolute value in this expression is used to find the minimum value of the given expression. This is because the absolute value always returns a positive value, so finding its minimum value is equivalent to finding the minimum distance of the expression from the origin.

Why is the condition |z| ≥ 3 necessary in the given expression?

The condition |z| ≥ 3 is necessary because it restricts the possible values of z to a specific region. Without this condition, the expression |z+1/z| would not have a minimum value as z could approach infinity.

How do you find the least value of |z+1/z| for |z| ≥ 3?

The least value of |z+1/z| for |z| ≥ 3 can be found by using the properties of complex numbers. We can rewrite the expression as |z+1/z| = |z|+|1/z|. Since |z| is fixed at ≥ 3, the minimum value of |z+1/z| occurs when |1/z| is at its maximum, which is 1/|z|. Therefore, the minimum value is |z|+1/|z|, which occurs when |z| = 3.

Is there a geometric interpretation of the given expression?

Yes, there is a geometric interpretation of the expression. The complex number z can be represented as a point on the complex plane, with its magnitude being the distance from the origin. The expression |z+1/z| represents the distance from the point z to the point 1/z. Therefore, finding the minimum value of this expression is equivalent to finding the minimum distance between two points on the complex plane.

What are the practical applications of finding the least value of |z+1/z| for |z| ≥ 3?

The practical applications of finding the least value of |z+1/z| for |z| ≥ 3 are in optimization problems involving complex numbers. For example, in engineering, this expression can be used to minimize the distance between two points on a complex plane, which can be useful in designing circuits or systems. Additionally, in physics, this expression can be used to find the least distance between two particles moving in a complex plane.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top