MHB Find Mean With Multiple Data [Shortcut]

AI Thread Summary
To find the mean with multiple data points, the formula used is \(\overline{x}=\frac{\sum\limits_{k=1}^n\left(x_kf_k\right)}{\sum\limits_{k=1}^n\left(f_k\right)}\). Users expressed confusion about applying this formula to their data samples. An Excel shortcut for this calculation is =SUMPRODUCT(A2:A5, B2:B5) / SUM(B2:B5). However, it was clarified that calculating the mean without multiplying each data point by its frequency is not feasible. The provided formulas represent the simplest method for computing the mean from a frequency table.
susanto3311
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
hello everybody...

how to easy find mean with multiple data with simple formula [shortcut formula]?

please, see my picture..

thanks in advance...

susanto3311
 

Attachments

  • find mean with multiple data [shortcut].png
    find mean with multiple data [shortcut].png
    4.1 KB · Views: 80
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Here is the formula:

$$\overline{x}=\frac{\sum\limits_{k=1}^n\left(x_kf_k\right)}{\sum\limits_{k=1}^n\left(f_k\right)}$$

But to compute the mean using the above formula, you will have to essentially do what is shown in the table.
 
hi Mark, thanks but i confuse how to use your formula...

could you use my data sample (post #1)?
 
susanto3311 said:
hi Mark, thanks but i confuse how to use your formula...

could you use my data sample (post #1)?

Hi susanto3311! Welcome to MHB! :)

The formula for your mean is:
$$Mean = \frac{
\overbrace{35+35+...+35}^{6}
+ \overbrace{40+40+...+40}^{8}
+ \overbrace{25+25+...+25}^{12}
+ \overbrace{20+20+...+20}^{24}
}{6+8+12+24}$$

In your picture each of the sums under an overbrace has been put in a separate cell. The result is calculated afterwards.

In Excel, you can do it in one formula: [m]=SUMPRODUCT(A2:A5, B2:B5) / SUM(B2:B5)[/m].
This is the same formula as the one that Mark gave, just in Excel style. (Wasntme)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi susanto3311! Welcome to MHB! :)

The formula for your mean is:
$$Mean = \frac{
\overbrace{35+35+...+35}^{6}
+ \overbrace{40+40+...+40}^{8}
+ \overbrace{25+25+...+25}^{12}
+ \overbrace{20+20+...+20}^{24}
}{6+8+12+24}$$

In your picture each of the sums under an overbrace has been put in a separate cell. The result is calculated afterwards.

In Excel, you can do it in one formula: [m]=SUMPRODUCT(A2:A5, B2:B5) / SUM(B2:B5))[/m].
This is the same formula as the one that Mark gave, just in Excel style. (Wasntme)

i just want, how to find & calculate mean without hard work...
like my picture attach, without multiplication for each data with frequency...
do you have ideas?
 

Attachments

  • mean problem_1.png
    mean problem_1.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 67
susanto3311 said:
without multiplication for each data with frequency...

Sorry, but that is not possible. (Dull)
The formulas given are the simplest way to calculate the mean of a frequency table.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top