- #1
zenterix
- 702
- 84
- Homework Statement
- A force ##\vec{F}_1=A\hat{j}## is applied to ##\vec{r}_1=a\hat{i}## and a force ##\vec{F}_2## is applied to ##\vec{r}_2=b\hat{j}##.
Find the arm ##l## of the resultant force relative to the origin.
- Relevant Equations
- The solution below coincides with the solution manual but at this point it is pretty clear that I arrived at this answer by chance (and incorrect methods).
We have
The torque about the origin is
$$\vec{\tau}=(aA-bB)\hat{k}\tag{1}$$
The resultant force is
$$\vec{F}_R=B\hat{i}+A\hat{j}\tag{2}$$
At this point, all I did was compute
$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{r}||\vec{F}_R|\sin{\theta}=l|\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|\tag{3}$$
which led to
$$l=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|}{|\vec{F}_R|}=\frac{\sqrt{(aA-bB)^2}}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\tag{4}$$
which coincides with the solution manual
My question is about (3).
I wrote ##|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|## without thinking much about why I did that and now it seems pretty incorrect.
Here is my current thinking
1) We have a system of two particles of certain unknown masses ##m_1## and ##m_2##.
2) The resultant force on the system works on the center of mass, which is at an unknown position ##\vec{r}## which appears in (3).
$$\vec{r}=\frac{m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$
$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{(m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2)\times (\vec{F}_1+\vec{F}_2)}{m_1+m_2}$$
$$=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2+m_1\vec{r}_1\times\vec{F}_2+m_2\vec{r}_2\times \vec{F}_1}{m_1+m_2}$$
The two last terms in the numerator are zero in this problem.
Thus,
$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$
$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{m_1+m_2}=l|\vec{F}_R|$$
$$l=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{(m_1+m_2)\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}$$
How did the solution manual arrive at the rhs of (4) as the solution? Ie, why are there no masses in their solution?
The torque about the origin is
$$\vec{\tau}=(aA-bB)\hat{k}\tag{1}$$
The resultant force is
$$\vec{F}_R=B\hat{i}+A\hat{j}\tag{2}$$
At this point, all I did was compute
$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{r}||\vec{F}_R|\sin{\theta}=l|\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|\tag{3}$$
which led to
$$l=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|}{|\vec{F}_R|}=\frac{\sqrt{(aA-bB)^2}}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\tag{4}$$
which coincides with the solution manual
My question is about (3).
I wrote ##|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|## without thinking much about why I did that and now it seems pretty incorrect.
Here is my current thinking
1) We have a system of two particles of certain unknown masses ##m_1## and ##m_2##.
2) The resultant force on the system works on the center of mass, which is at an unknown position ##\vec{r}## which appears in (3).
$$\vec{r}=\frac{m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$
$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{(m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2)\times (\vec{F}_1+\vec{F}_2)}{m_1+m_2}$$
$$=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2+m_1\vec{r}_1\times\vec{F}_2+m_2\vec{r}_2\times \vec{F}_1}{m_1+m_2}$$
The two last terms in the numerator are zero in this problem.
Thus,
$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$
$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{m_1+m_2}=l|\vec{F}_R|$$
$$l=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{(m_1+m_2)\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}$$
How did the solution manual arrive at the rhs of (4) as the solution? Ie, why are there no masses in their solution?
Last edited: