MHB Find the area of the shaded region

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
AI Thread Summary
The discussion presents a geometry problem involving two circles centered at points P and Q, with a tangent chord AB parallel to the line PQ. The length of the chord AB is given as x units. Participants are encouraged to find the area of the shaded region, specifically the area between the two circles. The problem aims to engage members of the forum in solving a geometric challenge. The thread invites solutions and insights from the community while emphasizing the enjoyment of the problem itself.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Points $$P$$ and $$Q$$ are centers of the circles as shown below. Chord $$AB$$ is tangent to the circle with center $$P$$. Given that the line $$PQ$$ is parallel to chord $$AB$$ and $$AB=x$$ units, find the area of the shaded region in yellow.

[TIKZ]
\draw [<->] (0.2,1) -- (5.8, 1);
\begin{scope}
\draw (3,0) circle(3);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\draw (1,0) circle(1);
\end{scope}
\coordinate[label=above: P] (P) at (1,0);
\coordinate[label=above: Q] (Q) at (3,0);
\coordinate[label=left: A] (A) at (0.2,1);
\coordinate[label=right: B] (B) at (5.8,1);
\coordinate[label=above: $x$] (x) at (2.8,1);
\filldraw (1,0) circle (2pt);
\filldraw (3,0) circle (2pt);

\draw[fill=red,fill opacity=0.6] (1,0) circle (1);
\draw[fill=yellow,fill opacity=0.5] (3,0) circle (3);
[/TIKZ]

I am not seeking for help, I just want to share an interesting geometry problem at MHB with the hope our members enjoy it. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For those who are interested, you are welcome to post your solution here! I initially wanted to post this in the Challenges subforum, but was afraid this might not difficult enough to be claimed as a challenge problem. (Smile)
 
Solution of MarkFL:
[TIKZ]
\draw [<->] (0.2,1) -- (5.8, 1);
\begin{scope}
\draw (3,0) circle(3);
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}
\draw (1,0) circle(1);
\end{scope}
\coordinate[label=below: P] (P) at (1,0);
\coordinate[label=below: Q] (Q) at (3,0);
\coordinate[label=left: A] (A) at (0.2,1);
\coordinate[label=right: B] (B) at (5.8,1);
\coordinate (T) at (3,1);
\coordinate[label=above: $\frac x2$] (x) at (1.9,1);
\coordinate[label=above: $R$] (R) at (2.2,0.0001);
\coordinate[label=above: $r$] (r) at (3.2,0.1);
\filldraw (1,0) circle (2pt);
\filldraw (3,0) circle (2pt);
\draw (Q)-- (A);
\draw (Q)-- (T);
\draw[fill=red,fill opacity=0.6] (1,0) circle (1);
\draw[fill=yellow,fill opacity=0.5] (3,0) circle (3);
\draw (3,0.9) rectangle +(-0.1, 0.1);
[/TIKZ]
Let the radius of the smaller circle be $$r$$ and the radius of the bigger circle be $$R$$.

Next, build a right-angled triangle where the base of it is half of $$AB$$, i.e. $$\dfrac{x}{2}$$.

Now, by applying the Pythagoras' theorem, we get

$$\begin{align*}\text{Area of shaded region}&=\pi(R^2-r^2)\\&=\pi\left(\dfrac{x}{2}\right)^2\\&=\dfrac{\pi x^2}{4}\end{align*}$$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top