Find the floor of the product of a series

In summary: Re: Find the absolute valueIn summary, the given expression evaluates to a value between $8.2$ and $8.8$, which means its floor value is $\boxed{8}$. This can be found by using Stirling's formula to approximate the product and then using inequalities to determine the range of the value.
  • #1
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
3,883
115
Evaluate $\left|\dfrac{2017}{2013}\times \dfrac{2009}{2005}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{49}{45}\times \dfrac{41}{37}\times\dfrac{33}{29} \right|$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: Find the absolute value

Using W|A, I find the product is:

83836150565816858292640911206036394563843681031859
52356168446790030435481142305738272797214023758253
70545227854661976992847614540194807590851534324428
04393499734248743073514379606568657879433625129913
6361634674742694324903259277229258753

divided by

97080688590435020901312257449744872243043749596819
59388449562938368617693451031135430220537455405367
99055475980516651749335764543619797829673412762497
25762328646784869776620872718676646990400310128382
088560961232371053400465434017358045
 
  • #3
Re: Find the absolute value

I am sorry, MarkFL!(Angry):(

I meant to say, find the floor of the expression, i.e:

$\left\lfloor\dfrac{2017}{2013}\times \dfrac{2009}{2005}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{49}{45}\times \dfrac{41}{37}\times\dfrac{33}{29} \right\rfloor$.
 
  • #4
Re: Find the absolute value

anemone said:
I am sorry, MarkFL!(Angry):(

I meant to say, find the floor of the expression, i.e:

$\left\lfloor\dfrac{2017}{2013}\times \dfrac{2009}{2005}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{49}{45}\times \dfrac{41}{37}\times\dfrac{33}{29} \right\rfloor$.

Yeah right...you are just trying to get to the 1,000 post mark more quickly...you can't fool me. (Tongueout)

But, it's good because this helps me get to the 5,000 post mark too. (Star)

Seriously though, I kind of thought that's what you meant, but I ran with it anyway. (Smoking)
 
  • #5
Re: Find the absolute value

LOL! ;)Though I desperately wanted to hit the 1,000 post mark as soon as possible, I would never post something unintelligible for our members. I don't know why I kept making silly mistakes at our site since the last few days. Perhaps I need to drink more coffee...
 
  • #6
anemone said:
Evaluate $\left|\dfrac{2017}{2013}\times \dfrac{2009}{2005}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{49}{45}\times \dfrac{41}{37}\times\dfrac{33}{29} \right|$.

Hello.

[tex]\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^{249} (1+\dfrac{1}{2n+5+\frac{1}{4}}) \approx{}8.635718574
[/tex]

Regards.

Edit:

At this time:

Rate problem=8

Post anemone=992

992 post+8 post=1000 post. Congrats.:eek:
 
Last edited:
  • #7
anemone said:
Evaluate $\left\lfloor\dfrac{2017}{2013}\times \dfrac{2009}{2005}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{49}{45}\times \dfrac{41}{37}\times\dfrac{33}{29} \right\rfloor$.
[sp]I used Stirling's formula $n! \approx \sqrt{2\pi n}(n/e)^n$ to find that $$\frac{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\ \cdots\ (2n)\quad }{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1)} = \frac{2^2 \cdot 4^2 \cdot 6^2 \cdots (2n)^2}{(2n)!} = \frac{2^{2n}(n!)^2}{(2n)!} \approx \frac{2^{2n}\cdot 2\pi n\cdot n^{2n}\cdot e^{2n}}{2\sqrt{\pi n}\cdot(2n)^{2n}\cdot e^{2n}} = \sqrt{\pi n}.$$ The approximation is correct up to a factor of the order of $1/n$. So if $n$ is around $250$ say, then the approximation should be correct up to a couple of decimal places. Then $$\begin{aligned}\frac{33}{29} \cdot \frac{41}{37} \cdot \frac{49}{45} \cdots \frac{2017}{2013} &< \frac{32}{28} \cdot \frac{40}{36} \cdot \frac{48}{44} \cdots \frac{2016}{2012} \\ &= \frac{8}{7} \cdot \frac{10}{9} \cdot \frac{12}{11} \cdots \frac{504}{503} = \frac{1\cdot 3 \cdot 5}{2\cdot 4\cdot 6} \cdot \frac{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\cdots504}{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots 503} \approx \frac{15\sqrt{252\pi}}{48} \approx 8.79.\end{aligned}$$ To get an inequality the other way round, use Stirling's formula again to find that $$\frac{3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \cdots (2n+1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\ \cdots\ (2n)\quad } = \frac{(2n+1)!}{\bigl((2n)!\bigr)^2} \approx \frac{2n+1}{\sqrt{\pi n}}.$$ Then $$\begin{aligned}\frac{33}{29} \cdot \frac{41}{37} \cdot \frac{49}{45} \cdots \frac{2017}{2013} &> \frac{36}{32} \cdot \frac{44}{40} \cdot \frac{52}{48} \cdots \frac{2020}{2016} \\ &= \frac{9}{8} \cdot \frac{11}{10} \cdot \frac{13}{12} \cdots \frac{505}{504} = \frac{2\cdot 4\cdot 6}{3\cdot 5 \cdot 7} \cdot \frac{505!}{(504!)^2} \approx \frac{48\cdot 505}{105\sqrt{252\pi}} \approx 8.20.\end{aligned}$$ Thus \(\displaystyle \frac{33}{29} \cdot \frac{41}{37} \cdot \frac{49}{45} \cdots \frac{2017}{2013}\) lies between $8.2$ and $8.8$ (in agreement with what mente oscura found), and so its integer part is 8.[/sp]
 
Last edited:
  • #8
mente oscura said:
Hello.

[tex]\displaystyle\prod_{n=1}^{249} (1+\dfrac{1}{2n+5+\frac{1}{4}}) \approx{}8.635718574
[/tex]

Regards.

Edit:

At this time:

Rate problem=8

Post anemone=992

992 post+8 post=1000 post. Congrats.:eek:

Thanks, mente oscura for participating...and I will accept that answer (yes, it is correct but you haven't convinced me how you gotten the approximate value for that product and hence determined its floor value), because you are nevertheless a good member at our site. :eek:

Based on your other brilliant calculation about how I gotten the 1k posts, I want to thank you too and also the congratulations note as well. Hehehe...:cool: By the way, I am very close to making my 1000th post!

Opalg said:
[sp]I used Stirling's formula $n! \approx \sqrt{2\pi n}(n/e)^n$ to find that $$\frac{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\ \cdots\ (2n)\quad }{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots (2n-1)} = \frac{2^2 \cdot 4^2 \cdot 6^2 \cdots (2n)^2}{(2n)!} = \frac{2^{2n}(n!)^2}{(2n)!} \approx \frac{2^{2n}\cdot 2\pi n\cdot n^{2n}\cdot e^{2n}}{2\sqrt{\pi n}\cdot(2n)^{2n}\cdot e^{2n}} = \sqrt{\pi n}.$$ The approximation is correct up to a factor of the order of $1/n$. So if $n$ is around $250$ say, then the approximation should be correct up to a couple of decimal places. Then $$\begin{aligned}\frac{33}{29} \cdot \frac{41}{37} \cdot \frac{49}{45} \cdots \frac{2017}{2013} &< \frac{32}{28} \cdot \frac{40}{36} \cdot \frac{48}{44} \cdots \frac{2016}{2012} \\ &= \frac{8}{7} \cdot \frac{10}{9} \cdot \frac{12}{11} \cdots \frac{504}{503} = \frac{1\cdot 3 \cdot 5}{2\cdot 4\cdot 6} \cdot \frac{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\cdots504}{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdots 503} \approx \frac{15\sqrt{252\pi}}{48} \approx 8.79.\end{aligned}$$ To get an inequality the other way round, use Stirling's formula again to find that $$\frac{3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7 \cdots (2n+1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6\ \cdots\ (2n)\quad } = \frac{(2n+1)!}{\bigl((2n)!\bigr)^2} \approx \frac{2n+1}{\sqrt{\pi n}}.$$ Then $$\begin{aligned}\frac{33}{29} \cdot \frac{41}{37} \cdot \frac{49}{45} \cdots \frac{2017}{2013} &> \frac{36}{32} \cdot \frac{44}{40} \cdot \frac{52}{48} \cdots \frac{2020}{2016} \\ &= \frac{9}{8} \cdot \frac{11}{10} \cdot \frac{13}{12} \cdots \frac{505}{504} = \frac{2\cdot 4\cdot 6}{3\cdot 5 \cdot 7} \cdot \frac{505!}{(504!)^2} \approx \frac{48\cdot 505}{105\sqrt{252\pi}} \approx 8.20.\end{aligned}$$ Thus \(\displaystyle \frac{33}{29} \cdot \frac{41}{37} \cdot \frac{49}{45} \cdots \frac{2017}{2013}\) lies between $8.2$ and $8.8$ (in agreement with what mente oscura found), and so its integer part is 8.[/sp]

Bravo, Opalg! Just so you know, the method that I wanted to share (that is a method provided by other who is apparently good at math) here is quite similar to yours!:)

Solution suggested by other, which I improved it for a bit:eek::
First we let
$m=\dfrac{2017}{2013}\times \dfrac{2009}{2005}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{49}{45}\times \dfrac{41}{37}\times\dfrac{33}{29} $

Observe that if we apply the AM-GM inequality to the terms $n$ and $n+8$, we have:

$\dfrac{n+(n+8)}{2}\ge \sqrt{n(n+8)}$

This simplifies to $n(n+8) < (n+4)^2 $, since $n \ne n+8$.

Rearranging it a bit we have that $\dfrac{n+8}{n+4}<\dfrac{n+4}{n}$ and numerically this tells us

$\dfrac{2017}{2013}<\dfrac{2013}{2009}$

$\dfrac{2009}{2005}<\dfrac{2005}{2001}$

$\;\;\;\;\;\;\vdots$

$\dfrac{41}{37}<\dfrac{37}{33}$

$\dfrac{33}{29}<\dfrac{29}{25}$

Multiplying them out gives

$\dfrac{2017}{2013}\times \dfrac{2009}{2005}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{41}{37}\times\dfrac{33}{29}<\dfrac{2013}{2017}\times \dfrac{2005}{2001}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{45}{41}\times\dfrac{37}{33}$

or $m<\dfrac{2013}{2017}\times \dfrac{2005}{1999}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{53}{49}\times \dfrac{45}{41}\times\dfrac{37}{33}$

Next, if we multiply both sides of the inequality with $m$, that yields

$m^2<\dfrac{2017}{25}$

$m<\sqrt{\dfrac{2017}{25}}<8.9822046$

By the similar token, we also have $\dfrac{n+4}{n} >\dfrac{n+8}{n+4}$,

$\dfrac{2007}{2013}\>\dfrac{2025}{2017}$

$\dfrac{2009}{2005}> \dfrac{2013}{2009}$

$\;\;\;\;\;\;\vdots$

$\dfrac{41}{37}\ge \dfrac{45}{41}$

$\dfrac{33}{29}\ge \dfrac{37}{33}$

Multiplying them out gives

$m>\dfrac{2025}{2017}\times \dfrac{2013}{2009}\times \cdots \times \dfrac{37}{33}\times\dfrac{45}{41}$

Multiply both sides by $m$ gives

$m^2>\dfrac{2025}{29}$

$m>\sqrt{\dfrac{2025}{29}}>8.35629$

By combining the two inequalities of $m$, we have $8.35629<m<8.9822046$, so we have the floor of $m$ as 8.
 

FAQ: Find the floor of the product of a series

What is the definition of finding the floor of the product of a series?

The floor of the product of a series refers to the largest integer that is less than or equal to the product of all the numbers in the series.

How is the floor of the product of a series calculated?

To calculate the floor of the product of a series, you multiply all the numbers in the series and then round down to the nearest integer.

What is the significance of finding the floor of the product of a series?

Finding the floor of the product of a series is useful in many applications, such as determining the minimum number of items needed to complete a task or the maximum number of people that can be accommodated in a space.

Can the floor of the product of a series be a decimal or fraction?

No, the floor of the product of a series will always be an integer because it is rounded down to the nearest whole number.

Is finding the floor of the product of a series the same as finding the average of the series?

No, finding the floor of the product of a series involves multiplying all the numbers in the series and rounding down, while finding the average involves adding all the numbers in the series and dividing by the total number of numbers.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
969
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
2
Replies
60
Views
9K
Back
Top