Find the intensity as function of y (interference between two propagating waves)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the intensity of interference between a spherical wave and a plane wave at a flat screen. The derived expression for intensity includes a cosine term, leading to confusion about whether the cosine should be squared. Participants agree that the intensity expression should not yield negative values, indicating a potential error in the book's solution. After reviewing the calculations, one contributor realizes they overlooked the square in their own answer, suggesting that the book's answer may indeed be incorrect. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the need for verification of the intensity formula.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Let a spherical wave propagate from the origin, $y = ADcos(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)/r$. Also, let a plane wave propagate parallel to the x axis, $y = Acos(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)$. At x = D there is a flat screen perpendicular to the x axis. Find the interference at the point y on the screen as function of the interference at y=0.$$ E = (A e^{i(wt-2\pi D/ \lambda)} + AD/r e^{i(wt-2\pi r/ \lambda)} ) $$

$$ I = Q* (A^2 + (AD/r )^2 + 2AD*A/r cos{(2\pi D/ \lambda -2\pi r/ \lambda)} ) $$
Now, i pretend to use $$r \approx D$$ outside the cos, and $$r = \sqrt{ D^2 + y^2} \approx D(1+(y^2)/(2*D^2))$$ inside it.
So that $$ I = Q* (A^2 + A^2 + 2A^2 cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))} ) = 2A^2(1+cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))}) = 4A^2cos(\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda) = I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(2D \lambda)) $$

THe problem is that the solutions is ##I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(D \lambda)) ## And i have no idea where is my mistake.
 

Attachments

  • m.png
    m.png
    4 KB · Views: 128
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
$$2A^2(1+cos{(2\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda))}) = 4A^2cos(\pi (y^2)/(2*D \lambda) $$
Shouldn't the cosine function be squared on the right-hand side?

Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. In particular, I think the factor of 2 in the denominator of the argument of the cosine function is correct.
Herculi said:
THe problem is that the solutions is ##I_o cos(\pi (y^2)/(D \lambda)) ## And i have no idea where is my mistake.
Did they have a square on the cosine function? If not, it is clearly wrong since the intensity cannot ever be negative.
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist
TSny said:
Shouldn't the cosine function be squared on the right-hand side?

Otherwise, your work looks correct to me. In particular, I think the factor of 2 in the denominator of the argument of the cosine function is correct.

Did they have a square on the cosine function? If not, it is clearly wrong since the intensity cannot ever be negative.
Yes, i forgot the square in both answer. Thank you, so aparenttly the answer given by the book is wrong in fact.
 
Herculi said:
Thank you, so aparenttly the answer given by the book is wrong in fact.
It appears that way to me. Maybe someone else will confirm it.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top