Find the present value of lottery winnings

  • Thread starter Thread starter isukatphysics69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    lottery Value
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the present value of lottery winnings, highlighting errors in the initial attempt. The formula used was incorrect due to improper indexing, which led to significant discrepancies in the final value. Additionally, the importance of maintaining precision in calculations is emphasized, as rounding too early can lead to substantial errors. The correct approach involves using the exact values for interest rates and keeping more decimal places throughout the computation. Accurate financial calculations are crucial, as they often involve large sums and require precision to avoid costly mistakes.
isukatphysics69
Messages
453
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement

calculus.PNG


Homework Equations


in picture

The Attempt at a Solution


(200000(1-0.96^19))/(1-0.96) = 2697903.99

not sure what i did wrong here, answer seems close.
 

Attachments

  • calculus.PNG
    calculus.PNG
    8.8 KB · Views: 1,077
Physics news on Phys.org
check your underlying math...
1.)
##\frac{1}{1.04} \gt 0.96##

2.)
also note the different indexing in the finite series up top vs the problem you are asked to solve.

- - - -
You are suppose to show some more work than this, I think, though I know in a lot of finance courses they don't make you derive / telescope the finite geometric series.
 
  • Like
Likes isukatphysics69
isukatphysics69 said:

Homework Statement

View attachment 225578

Homework Equations


in picture

The Attempt at a Solution


(200000(1-0.96^19))/(1-0.96) = 2697903.99

not sure what i did wrong here, answer seems close.

(1) 1/1.04 ≠ 0.96. The differences are large enough to throw off the answer by almost $40,000, using exactly the same formula for the sum.
(2) Your sum formula is wrong: you are using the formula for ##\sum_{n=0}^{19}## when you should be doing ##\sum_{n=1}^{20}##. That throws you off by about another $109,000.

So: keep more decimal places in intermediate computations. Using 1/1.04 ≈ .9615384615 will do the job. Nowadays, with good hand-held calculators and computers there is no reason to round off so much, at least until the job is done.

BTW: do not be mis-lead by typical advice to keep only as many significant figures as the data: you should round off at the END of a calculation, not during it. Besides, the 1.04 is not really just a 3 sig-fig number; it is actually accurate to infinitely many decimal places, since the 4% is accurate (the "4" is an integer, not a floating-point number) and so your 1.04 is really 1 + (4/100) = 104/100 EXACTLY.

Financial calculations are not like calculations in physics; if a financial institution says that an interest rate is 3.95%, it means that the interest rate is 0.03950000... = 395/1000 with absolute accuracy, and it will typically carry out calculations of multi-million dollar amounts down to the nearest penny. Financial computations don't usually involve the concept of "significant figures" at all!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes isukatphysics69
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K