MHB Find the smallest A satisfying the inequality

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the smallest real number A that satisfies the inequality involving the Fibonacci sequence defined by a_1 = 1, a_2 = 1, and a_n = a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} for n > 2. The specific inequality to be satisfied is \[\sum_{i = 1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} \leq A\] for any natural number k. Participants are tasked with determining the value of A that holds true for all k. The conversation highlights the mathematical approach to solving this inequality using properties of the Fibonacci sequence. Ultimately, the goal is to identify the smallest A that meets the criteria outlined in the inequality.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Let $a_1 = 1$, $a_2 = 1$ and $a_n = a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}$ for each $n > 2$. Find the smallest real number, $A$, satisfying

\[\sum_{i = 1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} \leq A\]

for any natural number $k$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Let $a_1 = 1$, $a_2 = 1$ and $a_n = a_{n-1}+a_{n-2}$ for each $n > 2$. Find the smallest real number, $A$, satisfying

\[\sum_{i = 1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} \leq A\]

for any natural number $k$.

we have
$\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+1}}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+2}- a_i}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$ (from given condition)
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}(\frac{1}{a_i} - \frac{1} {a_{i+2}})$
above term is positive and telescopic sum so maximum sum is sum at infinite and adding we get
$\frac{1}{a_1a_2} + \frac{1}{a_2a_3}$ and se get putting the values $\frac{3}{2}$
 
kaliprasad said:
we have
$\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+1}}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}\frac{a_{i+2}- a_i}{a_{i}a_{i+2}}$ (from given condition)
$= \frac{1}{a_{i+1}}(\frac{1}{a_i} - \frac{1} {a_{i+2}})$
above term is positive and telescopic sum so maximum sum is sum at infinite and adding we get
$\frac{1}{a_1a_2} + \frac{1}{a_2a_3}$ and se get putting the values $\frac{3}{2}$

Hi, kaliprasad

With your telescoping sum, I get:
\[\sum_{i=1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} = \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left ( \frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{i+1}a_{i+2}} \right )\\ =\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_2a_3}+\frac{1}{a_2a_3}-...+ \frac{1}{a_{k-1}a_k}-\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}+\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \\ = \frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} = 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}}.\]

So the smallest possible $A$, that satisfies the inequality is:
\[\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty }\left ( 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \right ) = 1.\]
 
lfdahl said:
Hi, kaliprasad

With your telescoping sum, I get:
\[\sum_{i=1}^{k}\frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+2}} = \sum_{i=1}^{k}\left ( \frac{1}{a_{i}a_{i+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{i+1}a_{i+2}} \right )\\ =\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_2a_3}+\frac{1}{a_2a_3}-...+ \frac{1}{a_{k-1}a_k}-\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}+\frac{1}{a_ka_{k+1}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \\ = \frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}}-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} = 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}}.\]

So the smallest possible $A$, that satisfies the inequality is:
\[\lim_{k\rightarrow \infty }\left ( 1-\frac{1}{a_{k+1}a_{k+2}} \right ) = 1.\]

it is my mistake.
Your telescopic sum and hence limit is right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top