MHB Find the value in terms of p and q

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlearn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms Value
AI Thread Summary
To find the value of \( \log_a(72) \) in terms of \( p \) and \( q \), the logarithm can be expressed as \( \log_a(72) = \log_a(2^3 \cdot 3^2) \). By applying the properties of logarithms, this simplifies to \( \log_a(72) = \log_a(2^3) + \log_a(3^2) \), which further breaks down to \( 3\log_a(2) + 2\log_a(3) \). Substituting the values \( \log_a(2) = p \) and \( \log_a(3) = q \) gives \( \log_a(72) = 3p + 2q \). Thus, the final expression for \( \log_a(72) \) is \( 3p + 2q \).
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
If $log_a 2 = P $ & $ log_a 3 = q$ find $log_a 72 $ in terms of $p$ & $q $

I'm not sure on how to begin this may be convert the logarithms to decimals :confused:

Many Thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We are given:

$$\log_a(2)=p$$ and $$\log_a(3)=q$$

Now, we may write:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Can you now proceed to use the properties of logs to express this in terms of $p$ and $q$?
 
MarkFL said:
We are given:

$$\log_a(2)=p$$ and $$\log_a(3)=q$$

Now, we may write:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Can you now proceed to use the properties of logs to express this in terms of $p$ and $q$?

Thank you very much MarkFL (Happy) (Party)

Then expressing this in terms of $p$ & $q$,

It would be $p=3$ & $q=2$

May I know how the power of 3 on 2 & the power of 2 on 3 get derived below in the RHS

$\displaystyle \log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$
 
mathlearn said:
Thank you very much MarkFL (Happy) (Party)

Then expressing this in terms of $p$ & $q$,

It would be $p=3$ & $q=2$

May I know how the power of 3 on 2 & the power of 2 on 3 get derived below in the RHS

$\displaystyle \log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$

No, $p$ and $q$ don't somehow change values here. We observe that by prime factorization we have:

$$72=8\cdot9=2^3\cdot3^2$$

Hence:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Now, you want to use the properties of logs, specifically:

$$\log_a(b^c)=c\cdot\log_a(b)$$

$$\log_a(bc)=\log_a(b)+\log_a(c)$$

to further simplify. What do you get?
 
MarkFL said:
No, $p$ and $q$ don't somehow change values here. We observe that by prime factorization we have:

$$72=8\cdot9=2^3\cdot3^2$$

Hence:

$$\log_a(72)=\log_a\left(2^3\cdot3^2\right)$$

Now, you want to use the properties of logs, specifically:

$$\log_a(b^c)=c\cdot\log_a(b)$$

$$\log_a(bc)=\log_a(b)+\log_a(c)$$

to further simplify. What do you get?

Thank you very much MarkFL (Happy) (Party)

My apologies! for being a little late in replying,

Using the given properties of logarithms,

$\log_a72 = \log_a(2^3 \cdot 3^2)\\
=\log_a (2^3) + \log_a (3^2)\\
= 3 \log_a2 + 2\log_a3\\
= 3p + 2q$

Correct ? (Smile)
 
Yes, that looks good. :D
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top