MHB Find Work to Empty Conical Frustum Tank - Juan's Question at Yahoo Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to pump water out of a conical frustum tank. The tank's dimensions are provided, and the weight of water is stated as 62.5 lb/ft³. The approach involves decomposing the tank into horizontal slices, determining the volume and weight of each slice, and integrating to find the total work done. The final formula for work is derived, resulting in a value of 1188000π ft·lb. This calculation illustrates the application of calculus in solving real-world physics problems related to fluid dynamics.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

A tank is full of water. Find the work required to pump the water out of the spout. Use the fact that water...?

A tank is full of water. Find the work required to pump the water out of the spout. Use the fact that water weighs 62.5 lb/ft3. (Assume r = 6 ft, R = 12 ft, and h = 24 ft.)

*Picture*

View attachment 1237

___ft-lb___6.4, 5

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 

Attachments

  • juancone.jpg
    juancone.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 159
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Juan,

Let's orient a vertical $y$-axis coinciding with the axis of symmetry of the tank, with the origin at the top surface and the positive direction is down. Let us the decompose the tank into horizontal circular slices, where the radius of each slice decreases linearly as $y$ increases. We may let $r_y$ denote the radius of an arbitrary slice.

We know:

$$r_y(0)=R,\,r_y(h)=r$$

Hence:

$$r_y(y)=\frac{r-R}{h}y+R$$

And so the volume of the arbitrary slice is:

$$dV=\pi\left(\frac{r-R}{h}y+R \right)^2\,dy$$

Now, the weight $w$ of this slice can be found from the fact that weight is mass times the acceleration due to gravity, and mass is mass density $\rho$ times volume. Thus:

$$w=mg=g\rho dV=\pi g\rho\left(\frac{r-R}{h}y+R \right)^2\,dy$$

Now, the work done to lift this slice to the top of the tank is:

$$dW=Fd$$

Where the applied force $F$ is the weight of the slice, and the distance over which this force is applied is $y$. And so we have:

$$dW=\pi g\rho y\left(\frac{r-R}{h}y+R \right)^2\,dy$$

Expanding the square, and distributing the $y$, we have:

$$dW=\pi g\rho\left(\left(\frac{r-R}{h} \right)^2y^3+\frac{2R(r-R)}{h}y^2+R^2y \right)\,dy$$

Summing up all the work elements by integrating, we obtain:

$$W=\pi g\rho\int_0^h \left(\frac{r-R}{h} \right)^2y^3+\frac{2R(r-R)}{h}y^2+R^2y\,dy$$

$$W=\pi g\rho\left[\left(\frac{r-R}{2h} \right)^2y^4+\frac{2R(r-R)}{3h}y^3+\frac{R^2}{2}y^2 \right]_0^h=\pi g\rho\left(\left(\frac{r-R}{2h} \right)^2h^4+\frac{2R(r-R)}{3h}h^3+\frac{R^2}{2}h^2 \right)$$

$$W=\pi g\rho h^2\left(\left(\frac{r-R}{2} \right)^2+\frac{2R(r-R)}{3}+\frac{R^2}{2} \right)=\frac{\pi g\rho h^2}{12}\left(3r^2+2rR+R^2 \right)$$

Using the given data:

$$g\rho=62.5\frac{\text{lb}}{\text{ft}^3},\,h=24 \text{ ft},\,r=6\text{ ft},\,R=12\text{ ft}$$

we find:

$$W=\frac{\pi\left(62.5\frac{\text{lb}}{\text{ft}^3} \right)\left(24\text{ ft} \right)^2}{12}\left(3\left(6\text{ ft} \right)^2+2\left(6\text{ ft} \right)\left(12\text{ ft} \right)+\left(12\text{ ft} \right)^2 \right)=1188000\pi\text{ ft}\cdot\text{lb}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top