I Finding a Rational Function with data (Pade approximation)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using Pade approximations to derive a rational function from given data points. Participants highlight the potential of polynomial interpolation, suggesting that a 9th degree polynomial could fit the 10 data points perfectly. However, the original poster seeks to understand how to apply Pade approximations without a defined function. There is also mention of numerical differentiation as a possible method to estimate f(x) at a specific point. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the challenges of finding a rational function from discrete data and the advantages of Pade approximations in minimizing error.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR Summary
I have some points that I need to approximate a function by using a Rational function.
Dear Everybody,

I need some help understanding how to use pade approximations with a given data points (See the attachment for the data).
Here is the basic derivation of pade approximation read the Derivation of Pade Approximate.
I am confused on how to find a f(x) to the data or is there a better way to just use the values of data in order to find the rational function.
I thought about numerical differentiation in order to find f(x) at the point 0.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
cbarker1 said:
Summary:: I have some points that I need to approximate a function by using a Rational function.

Dear Everybody,

I need some help understanding how to use pade approximations with a given data points (See the attachment for the data).
Here is the basic derivation of pade approximation read the Derivation of Pade Approximate.
I am confused on how to find a f(x) to the data or is there a better way to just use the values of data in order to find the rational function.
I thought about numerical differentiation in order to find f(x) at the point 0.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
Why do you think you need to do the approximation with a rational function? You have 10 data points, so a 9th degree polynomial would go through all 10 points. As an alternative, you could use Bezier curve fitting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bézier_curve), to find a collection of functions that fit your data points.
 
Because I am learning about pade approximation and I am presenting this method to my colleagues, I need to know where to start. I understand that I can do the polynomial interpolation.
 
cbarker1 said:
Summary:: I have some points that I need to approximate a function by using a Rational function.

Here is the basic derivation of pade approximation read the Derivation of Pade Approximate.
According to the article in the link, you need to have the function definition in order to approximate it as the quotient of two power series. Obviously, you don't have the function definition. In the example in the article, they find the Pade approximation for ##f(x) = e^x##.
cbarker1 said:
I am confused on how to find a f(x) to the data or is there a better way to just use the values of data in order to find the rational function.
I thought about numerical differentiation in order to find f(x) at the point 0.
You mean at the point (1, 20)? I don't see how that would help at all. The graph of the plotted points doesn't look to me like any rational function (other than some polynomial).
 
Polynomial interpolation would works well in this data. But pade approximate would better because the error would be smaller. The best situation is having a defined function that does not happen in many cases in application problems. It is usual given by data points.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top