Finding Composition Series of Groups

In summary: D2n may have a non-trivial center, and central elements only contain themselves in their conjugacy class.for example, in D8 (the symmetries of a square), we have:[1] = {1}[r] = {r,r3}[r2] = {r2} (where the square brackets mean the conjugacy class of an element).even if we have a trivial center (like with D10 the symmetries of a regular pentagon), we still have:(rk)r(rk)-1
  • #1
Poirot1
245
0
My sum total of knowledge of composition series is: the definition, the jordan holder theorem and the fact that the product of the indices must equal the order of the group.
With this in mind, can someone help with me with finding a composition series for the following:(1) Z60

(2) D12 (dihedral group)

(3) S10 (symmetric group)

I am not looking for just an answer but actually how to go about finding a series.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Poirot said:
My sum total of knowledge of composition series is: the definition, the jordan holder theorem and the fact that the product of the indices must equal the order of the group.
With this in mind, can someone help with me with finding a composition series for the following:(1) Z60

(2) D12 (dihedral group)

(3) S10 (symmetric group)

I am not looking for just an answer but actually how to go about finding a series.
As a general strategy, start with the whole group, look for a maximal normal subgroup. Then repeat the process.

(1) should be easy, because $\mathbb{Z}_{60}$ is abelian and so every subgroup is normal. You start by looking for a maximal subgroup. For example, you could take the subgroup generated by 2, which is (isomorphic to) $\mathbb{Z}_{30}.$ Now repeat the process: find a maximal subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}_{30}.$ And so on.

For (2), any dihedral group $D_{2n}$ has a subgroup of index 2 (therefore necessarily normal), consisting of all the rotations in $D_{2n}$ and isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_{n}$. That subgroup is abelian, so you can proceed as in (1).

For (3), here's a hint.
 
  • #3
Ok thanks, it seems it should be quite easy but I have across an example which I don't understand. I am told that {0},<12>,<4>,Z48 is a composition series of Z48 but couldn't <24> be inserted between {0} and <12> since it is of order 2 in Z48? (sorry don't know how to do triangles denoting normal subgroup)
 
  • #4
Poirot said:
Ok thanks, it seems it should be quite easy but I have across an example which I don't understand. I am told that {0},<12>,<4>,Z48 is a composition series of Z48 but couldn't <24> be inserted between {0} and <12> since it is of order 2 in Z48? (sorry don't know how to do triangles denoting normal subgroup)
What you say is quite correct. The standard definition of a composition series requires that each component should be maximal normal in the next one. The series $\{0\}\lhd \langle12\rangle \lhd \langle4\rangle \lhd \mathbb{Z}_{48}$ fails that test on two counts. You could put $\langle24\rangle$ between $\{0\}$ and $\langle12\rangle$; and you could put $\langle2\rangle$ between $\langle4\rangle$ and $\mathbb{Z}_{48}$.
 
  • #5
oh sorry, I misread the text (it just said it was a normal series, not maximal). Well I will go away and follow your hints and advice. By the way, in dihedral groups, is it the case that the rotations are in a conjugacy class on their own?, as this would definately ease the burden working out if a group is closed under conjugacy. Also, are they any rules about what the subgroups of a dihedral group are. Thanks again, and also I would like to say (doubt this is particularly controversial) that I think you are the best mathematician on this site.
 
  • #6
Poirot said:
oh sorry, I misread the text (it just said it was a normal series, not maximal). Well I will go away and follow your hints and advice. By the way, in dihedral groups, is it the case that the rotations are in a conjugacy class on their own?, as this would definately ease the burden working out if a group is closed under conjugacy. Also, are they any rules about what the subgroups of a dihedral group are. Thanks again, and also I would like to say (doubt this is particularly controversial) that I think you are the best mathematician on this site.

the conjugacy class of a rotation will always contain just other rotations (because the rotations form a normal subgroup of the dihedral group), but not all rotations are conjugate (necessarily).

the reason for this is that for some n, D2n may have a non-trivial center, and central elements only contain themselves in their conjugacy class.

for example, in D8 (the symmetries of a square), we have:

[1] = {1}
[r] = {r,r3}
[r2] = {r2} (where the square brackets mean the conjugacy class of an element).

even if we have a trivial center (like with D10 the symmetries of a regular pentagon), we still have:

(rk)r(rk)-1= r (for k = 0,1,2,3,4)
(rks)r(rks)-1 = (rks)r(rks) = (rk)(sr)(rks) = (rk)(r4s)(rks) = (rk)(r4s)(sr-k) = r4

which shows that [r] = {r,r4}.

that is, conjugacy classes of a normal subgroup may still form a (non-trivial) partition of that normal subgroup (as another example, two cycles of the same cycle type may be conjugate in Sn, but not be conjugate in An​).
 

FAQ: Finding Composition Series of Groups

What is a composition series of groups?

A composition series of groups is a sequence of normal subgroups of a group, where each subgroup is a normal subgroup of the next. This means that each subgroup is a proper normal subgroup of the one that follows it and the last subgroup in the sequence is the trivial subgroup. The composition series provides a way to break down a group into smaller, simpler groups that are easier to understand.

Why is finding a composition series important?

Finding a composition series is important because it allows us to understand the structure of a group better. It helps us to identify important subgroups and to study how the group is built up from smaller subgroups. The composition series also plays a crucial role in the classification of groups.

How do you find a composition series of groups?

To find a composition series of groups, we start by identifying the normal subgroups of the group. Then, we choose one of these normal subgroups and divide the original group by it to get a factor group. We repeat this process with the factor group until we reach the trivial subgroup. The sequence of normal subgroups obtained in this way is the composition series of the group.

Can a group have more than one composition series?

Yes, a group can have more than one composition series. This is because there can be multiple ways to break down a group into smaller subgroups, each of which satisfies the conditions for a composition series. However, all composition series of a group will have the same number of terms, as this is a property of the group itself.

How does the composition series relate to the simple factors of a group?

The simple factors of a group are the building blocks of the group, in the sense that they cannot be broken down into smaller non-trivial normal subgroups. The composition series of a group provides a way to identify these simple factors, as they are the terms in the series that cannot be divided any further. This is why the composition series is often used in the classification of groups.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top