Finding Limit of Multi Variable Function Using Squeeze Law

In summary, the conversation discusses finding the limit of the function f(x,y)= \frac{x³+y³}{x²-y} as (x,y)->(0,0). The method of using polar coordinates is suggested, but it fails to provide a definite answer as the limit depends on the angle ${\alpha}$. It is pointed out that approaching the limit point along curves can result in different limits, as demonstrated by the example of approaching the origin along the curve y = x^2(1-x).
  • #1
Barioth
49
0
Let \(\displaystyle f(x,y)= \frac{x^3+y^3}{x^2-y} \)if \(\displaystyle x^2 \)is not equal to y
and 0 otherwise.

I need to find the limit when (x,y)->(0,0)

I'm sure the limit exist and is equal to 0, I was unable to conclude switching to polar coordinate so I wana use "the squeeze law"

I only have to evaluate \(\displaystyle f(x,y)= \frac{x^3}{x^2-y} \)

Here is what I get:

\(\displaystyle 0 \leq |f(x,y)|= \frac{x^2|x|}{|x^2-y|}\) now if \(\displaystyle |x^2-y|\geq 1\) I can conclude that f(x,y)->0 as (x,y)->0

Sadly I don't know how the handle the case where \(\displaystyle |x^2-y|<1\)

any hint?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Barioth said:
Let \(\displaystyle f(x,y)= \frac{x³+y³}{x²-y} \)if \(\displaystyle x² \)is not equal to y
and 0 otherwise.

I need to find the limit when (x,y)->(0,0)

I'm sure the limit exist and is equal to 0, I was unable to conclude switching to polar coordinate so I wana use "the squeeze law"

I only have to evaluate \(\displaystyle f(x,y)= \frac{x³}{x²-y} \)

Here is what I get:

\(\displaystyle 0 \leq |f(x,y)|= \frac{x²|x|}{|x^2-y|}\) now if \(\displaystyle |x²-y|\geq 1\) I can conclude that f(x,y)->0 as (x,y)->0

Sadly I don't know how the handle the case where \(\displaystyle |x²-y|<1\)

any hint?

Thanks

Setting $x=r\cos{\alpha}$, $y=r\sin{\alpha}$, then the function reads $\frac{r^2(\cos^3({\alpha})+ \sin^3({\alpha}))}{r\cos^2({\alpha})-\sin({\alpha})}$ which is a continuous function of $r$ so we may plug in $r=0$ to get the limit, which is zero.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Barioth said:
Let \(\displaystyle f(x,y)= \frac{x³+y³}{x²-y} \)if \(\displaystyle x² \)is not equal to y
and 0 otherwise.

I need to find the limit when (x,y)->(0,0)

I'm sure the limit exist and is equal to 0, I was unable to conclude switching to polar coordinate so I wana use "the squeeze law"

I only have to evaluate \(\displaystyle f(x,y)= \frac{x³}{x²-y} \)

Here is what I get:

\(\displaystyle 0 \leq |f(x,y)|= \frac{x²|x|}{|x^2-y|}\) now if \(\displaystyle |x²-y|\geq 1\) I can conclude that f(x,y)->0 as (x,y)->0

Sadly I don't know how the handle the case where \(\displaystyle |x²-y|<1\)

any hint?

Thanks

Unfortunately one of the possible way to arrive at [0,0] is along the line $\displaystyle y= x^{2}$ and that means that in any case the limit doesn't exist...

Kind regards$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #4
Barioth said:
Let \(\displaystyle f(x,y)= \frac{x³+y³}{x²-y} \)if \(\displaystyle x² \)is not equal to y
and 0 otherwise.

I need to find the limit when (x,y)->(0,0)

I'm sure the limit exist and is equal to 0
But $x^2$ in the denominator can be arbitrarily close to $y$ so that $x^2-y$ can be much smaller than $x^3+y^3$. For example, let $x=1/n$ and $y=1/n^2-1/n^4=(n^2-1)/n^4$. Then
\[
\frac{x^3+y^3}{x^2-y}=n^4\left(\frac{1}{n^3}+\frac{(n^2-1)^3}{n^{12}}\right)
=n+\frac{(n^2-1)^3}{n^8}\to\infty
\]
as $n\to\infty$.

P.S. Use $x^2$ in LaTeX instead of the Unicode symbol for square. Compare $x^2$ and $x²$.
 
  • #5
Evgeny.Makarov said:
But $x^2$ in the denominator can be arbitrarily close to $y$ so that $x^2-y$ can be much smaller than $x^3+y^3$. For example, let $x=1/n$ and $y=1/n^2-1/n^4=(n^2-1)/n^4$. Then
\[
\frac{x^3+y^3}{x^2-y}=n^4\left(\frac{1}{n^3}+\frac{(n^2-1)^3}{n^{12}}\right)
=n+\frac{(n^2-1)^3}{n^8}\to\infty
\]
as $n\to\infty$.

P.S. Use $x^2$ in LaTeX instead of the Unicode symbol for square. Compare $x^2$ and $x²$.

So where does my method fail? Thanks
 
  • #6
You can also approach the origin along the curve $y = x^2(1-x)$, which gives the limit $1$.

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif]
Fermat said:
So where does my method fail? Thanks
[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif]It is possible for a function to have radial limits in all directions (at some point), but not to have a limit at that point. [/FONT]
 
  • #7
Opalg said:
You can also approach the origin along the curve $y = x^2(1-x)$, which gives the limit $1$.

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif][/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Tahoma, Calibri, Geneva, sans-serif]It is possible for a function to have radial limits in all directions (at some point), but not to have a limit at that point. [/FONT]
I've only looked up to how to do this but this link How to find this limit?
suggest that provided the limit does not depend on ${\alpha}$, then the method is valid
 
  • #8
Fermat said:
I've only looked up to how to do this but this link How to find this limit?
suggest that provided the limit does not depend on ${\alpha}$, then the method is valid
Just goes to show you shouldn't believe everything on the internet (Shake) (or indeed in a textbook – they can sometimes make mistakes too).

The radial limit can be the same from all directions, yet the limit may not exist. The reason (as chisigma pointed out in comment #3) is that you can approach the limit point along curves as well as along straight lines, and thereby get different limits. The problem in this thread is an illustration of that. The limit along every line through the origin is $0$, but if you approach the origin along a curve sufficiently close to the parabola $y=x^2$ then you can get a different limit.
 
  • #9
Consider the following function,
$$ f(x,y) = \frac{xy^3}{x^2 + y^6} $$

Along the path $y=mx$ we get,
$$ f(x,mx) = \frac{x\cdot m^3x^3}{x^2 + m^6 x^6} = \frac{x^2m^3}{1 + x^4m^6} \to 0 \text{ as }x\to 0 $$

Thus, it has the same limit radially. However, along the path $x=y^3$ we get,
$$ f(y^3,y) = \frac{y^3 \cdot y^3}{y^6 + y^6} = \frac{1}{2} $$
This shows that $f(x,y)$ does not posses a limit at $(0,0)$.

This is just another example of when radial limits are insufficient.
 
  • #10
I think I realize my error now. In simplifying the function, I assumed $r$ is non-zero, and then plugged in $r=0$ to obtain the limit.
 

FAQ: Finding Limit of Multi Variable Function Using Squeeze Law

What is the Squeeze Law method for finding the limit of a multi-variable function?

The Squeeze Law, also known as the Sandwich Theorem, is a method used to find the limit of a multi-variable function by comparing it to two other functions whose limits are known. If the two functions "squeeze" the original function between them, then the limit of the original function must also be the same as the limits of the two "squeezing" functions.

When is the Squeeze Law method applicable?

The Squeeze Law method is applicable when the multi-variable function being evaluated has an indeterminate form, such as 0/0 or ∞/∞, at the limit point. It can also be used when the function is not continuous at the limit point.

What are the steps to using the Squeeze Law method?

The steps to using the Squeeze Law method are as follows:

  1. Identify the limit point of the multi-variable function.
  2. Find two other functions that "squeeze" the original function at the limit point. These functions should have known limits at the limit point.
  3. Prove that the two "squeezing" functions actually do "squeeze" the original function at the limit point.
  4. Take the limit of the two "squeezing" functions and compare it to the limit of the original function. If they are equal, then the limit of the original function also exists and is equal to the common limit of the two "squeezing" functions.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when using the Squeeze Law method?

Some common mistakes to avoid when using the Squeeze Law method include using "squeezing" functions that do not have known limits, not proving that the "squeezing" functions actually "squeeze" the original function, and not taking the limit of the "squeezing" functions before comparing them to the limit of the original function.

Can the Squeeze Law method be used for multi-variable functions with more than two variables?

Yes, the Squeeze Law method can be used for multi-variable functions with any number of variables. However, the process of finding "squeezing" functions may become more complex as the number of variables increases.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Back
Top