Finding Limits: Calculating vs. Uncertain Logic

In summary, the conversation discusses exercises on limits and how to find the answers through calculation. The first exercise involves finding the limits of (2^x+1)/(3^x+1) and (-9/8)^x, with the conclusion being that the first limit is 0 and the second does not exist. The second exercise is similar to the first and involves finding the limit of (8/9)^xa^x. The conversation also mentions the use of irrational numbers and geometric sequences in solving these limits.
  • #1
Siegfried
2
0
Hi,

I was doing some exercises on limits when I stumbled upon the following questions:
(limits are always x->infinity)

lim (2^x+1)/(3^x+1)

2nd one:
lim (-9/8)^x

The first one should be zero (3^x expands faster than 2^x), and the 2nd one doesn't seem to exist (according to maple and the solutions :wink: , I suppose it has something to do with the graph being all chopped up and not knowing if x->infinity is even or odd?).
Is there a way to find these answers trough calculation instead of uncertain logic :-p ?
Another exercise similar to the first one:
lim (8/9)^x
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
[tex]a^x = \exp(\ln a^x) = \exp(x \ln a) = (e^x)^{\ln a}[/tex]

you go from there.
 
  • #3
So lim(8/9)^x = lim e^(x*ln(8/9))
ln(8/9) (or ln (8 ) -ln(9)) is smaller than 0, resulting in a negative value for x*(ln(8/9))
So the result would be something of this form:
lim e^(-x*...)
or
lim 1/e^(x*...)
going towards 0
Am I correct?

Now, the limit of (-9/8)^x can't be calculated this way unless we use irrational numbers ( ln(a) = ln(-a)+Pi*I for a<0 ) , right? But is this the proof that the limit doesn't exist? or is there another reason?
 
  • #4
My hint was aimed at solving the first limit.

For the second one, you could show that the sequence {(-9/8)^2n} goes to +infinity and the sequence {(-9/8)^(2n+1)} goes to -infinity.
 
  • #5
for the second one you could also show that it is a geometric sequence with [tex] |r| > 1 [/tex].
 
  • #6
How, exactly, are you defining ax for a< 0?
 

FAQ: Finding Limits: Calculating vs. Uncertain Logic

What is the difference between calculating and uncertain logic when finding limits?

Calculating logic involves using mathematical formulas and equations to determine a limit, while uncertain logic relies on approximations and estimations.

Which approach is more accurate when finding limits?

Calculating logic is generally more accurate as it involves precise calculations and eliminates any uncertainties.

When should uncertain logic be used when finding limits?

Uncertain logic can be used when a limit cannot be calculated using traditional methods, or when the function being evaluated is too complex for exact calculations.

Is it possible to use a combination of calculating and uncertain logic to find limits?

Yes, in some cases, a hybrid approach may be used where calculating logic is used for most of the limit and uncertain logic is used for a small portion of it.

Are there any limitations to using uncertain logic when finding limits?

Yes, uncertain logic can introduce errors and may not always provide an accurate result. It should only be used as a last resort when traditional methods are not feasible.

Back
Top