Finding Magnetic Field in Paramagnetic Aluminum Rod of 35 cm, 10A

Click For Summary
To find the magnetic field inside a paramagnetic aluminum rod with a diameter of 35 cm carrying a current of 10 A, Ampère's law should be applied carefully due to the rod's lack of perfect cylindrical symmetry. The magnetization within the rod affects the calculations, prohibiting the use of the Biot-Savart law. The magnetic field intensity H can be determined using the formula H = J0 r / 2 for points within the rod, where J0 is the current density calculated as the total current divided by the cross-sectional area. The magnetic field B can then be derived using the relationship B = μ0(M + H), where M is the magnetization related to H. To find the bound current densities Jb and Kb, the curl of M and the cross product of M and the normal vector n should be utilized.
tomfrank
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i have a rod of 35 cm and a current of 10 A. the rod is a paramagnetic aluminum rod. how do i find the magnetic field inside the rod?


Homework Equations


the fact that the rod is paramagnetic changes anything?


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
tomfrank said:
the fact that the rod is paramagnetic changes anything?

Yes. You now have a magnetization inside the rod that prohibits use of the biot-savart law there.

Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "35 cm" - are you referring to the length? If so, you should be very careful in applying ampéres law as you do not have a perfect cylindrical symmetry.

Please clarify
 
sorry it is the diameter. and the rod is consider to to infinitely long.

so what should I use?
 
Okay - that eases thing up a bit :)

Use Ampéres law for the H-field:

\oint_{\partial \mathcal{S}}\vec H \cdot d\vec \ell = \int_{\mathcal{S}}\vec J_\mathrm{free}\cdot d\vec a

For points outside the wire, this of course reduces to the familiar form:

\oint_{\partial \mathcal{S}}\vec H \cdot d\vec \ell = I_\mathrm{free,encl}

but for points inside the wire, you must be careful to only include the part of the current that is enclosed by the loop - assume that the current density is uniform, if not stated otherwise.

THen you should find:

H\cdot2\pi r = J_0 \pi r^2 \quad\Rightarrow\quad H=\frac{J_0 r}{2} for r < 17.5 cm

Where J0 is the totalt current divided by the crossectional area of the wire

(take a moment to verify this)

Now use

\vec B = \mu_0(\vec M + \vec H)

together with

\vec M = \chi \vec H

to find the required result
 
Last edited:
so once i find the H which is the magnetic field i just plugged in the
<br /> \vec B = \mu_0(\vec M + \vec H)<br />
along with
<br /> \vec M = \chi \vec H<br />

so is <br /> J_0 <br />
the current they gave me?
 
tomfrank said:
so is <br /> J_0 <br />
the current they gave me?

As I stated, it is the current density which is the total current divided by the cross-sectional area of the wire. THat is:

<br /> J_0=\frac{10\,\mathrm{A}}{\pi(0.35 \,\mathrm{m})^2}<br />
 
how will I find the bound current density Jb and Kb.Jb= curl M

Kb= cross product of M and n.

is this right and how do I do the curl?
 
tomfrank said:
how will I find the bound current density Jb and Kb.


Jb= curl M

Kb= cross product of M and n.

is this right and how do I do the curl?

It's right - so just plug-in the magnetization you got from \vec M = \chi \vec H
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K