I Finding ##S_x## eigenstate using experiments

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Quantum mechanics, McIntyre, pg 62
IMG_20220426_181555.JPG

For above spin ##1## Stern Gerlach experiment a set of results is
"##
\begin{array}{c}
\mathcal{P}_{1 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 1 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4} \\
\mathcal{P}_{0 x}=\left.\left.\right|_{x}\langle 0 \mid 1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{2} \\
\mathcal{P}_{-1 x}=\left.\right|_{x}\left(-\left.1|1\rangle\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{4},\right.
\end{array}
##
as illustrated in Fig. 2.12. These experimental results can be used to determine the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis
##
\begin{array}{l}
|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle \\
|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle \\
|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle
\end{array}
##"To find the ##S_{x}## eigenstates in terms of the ##S_{z}## basis I need two more similar experiments in which the input to Sx analyzer are ##0,-1## spin particles respectively.

However I am getting a sign ambiguity while using the experimental results.

Below are two expressions which both are in line with the experiments:

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle+\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##How do we resolve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kashmir said:
* ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##
##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##
##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
 
  • Like
Likes Kashmir, Doc Al and PeroK
DrClaude said:
These states are not orthogonal.

Note that there is also some convention coming in. It is possible to find other linear combinations that satisfy the experiment, but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates. It is also conventional to take spin along x to have real coefficients in the Sz basis.
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##

So the other conventions as you mentioned are used to pick out a convenient set of orthogonal expressions ?
 
DrClaude said:
but a choice is made to recover a right-handed system of coordinates
Can you also please explain this?
 
Kashmir said:
Here are another orthogonal vectors ##|1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle##

##|0\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|1\rangle+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|-1\rangle##

##|-1\rangle_{x}=\frac{1}{2}|1\rangle-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}|0\rangle-\frac{1}{2}|-1\rangle ##
Yes, this would be a possibility.

Kashmir said:
Can you also please explain this?
You want, for instance, that a rotation by ##\pi/2## around the y-axis will transform ##\ket{1}_x## into ##\ket{1}_z##.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top