MHB Finding Solutions for a Modulus Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prove It
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modulus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the modulus equation |x - 4| - |x + 2| = 6 by analyzing the behavior of the modulus functions based on the value of x. It identifies three cases for x: when x < -2, -2 ≤ x < 4, and x ≥ 4, leading to different expressions for the equation. The solution reveals that for x < -2, the equation holds true, while solving the equation for the middle case yields x = -2, which is valid within the specified range. Ultimately, the solution concludes that all values of x less than or equal to -2 satisfy the original equation. This highlights an interesting aspect of modulus equations where the solution set can be an interval rather than a single value.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Solve $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x - 4 \right| - \left| x + 2 \right| = 6 \end{align*}$ for $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x \end{align*}$.

To start with, we need to realize that each modulus function will be defined differently depending on the value of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x \end{align*}$.

Notice that

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x - 4 \right| = \begin{cases} x - 4 \textrm{ if } x \geq 4 \\ 4 - x \textrm{ if } x < 4 \end{cases} \end{align*}$

and

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x + 2 \right| = \begin{cases} x + 2 \textrm{ if } x \geq -2 \\ - x - 2 \textrm{ if } x < -2 \end{cases} \end{align*}$

Thus

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x - 4 \right| - \left| x + 2 \right| &= \begin{cases} \left( 4 - x \right) - \left( -x - 2 \right) \textrm{ if } x < -2 \\ \left( 4 - x \right) - \left( x + 2 \right) \textrm{ if } -2 \leq x < 4 \\ \left( x - 4 \right) - \left( x + 2 \right) \textrm{ if } x \geq 4 \end{cases} \\ &= \begin{cases} 6 \textrm{ if } x < -2 \\ 2 - 2\,x \textrm{ if } -2 \leq x < 4 \\ -6 \textrm{ if } x \geq 4 \end{cases} \end{align*}$

Notice that we already have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x - 4 \right| - \left| x + 2 \right| = 6 \textrm{ if } x < -2 \end{align*}$.

If we solve $\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2 - 2\,x = 6 \end{align*}$ for $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x \end{align*}$ we find

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} 2 - 2\,x &= 6 \\ 2\,x &= -4 \\ x &= -2 \end{align*}$

which satisfies the condition $\displaystyle \begin{align*} -2 \leq x < 4 \end{align*}$.

Thus the solution to $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left| x - 4 \right| - \left| x + 2 \right| = 6 \end{align*}$ is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x \leq -2 \end{align*}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Very interesting. At first glance I thought your answer couldn't be right because it was not a specific value but I see that it IS right in that all values <= -2 work. Very cool.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
It's more obvious if we let ##x = y +4## and look for$$|y| = | y + 6|+6$$Especially if we look at that graphically.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top