Finding the eigenspace for this value of lambda

In summary, the two students were able to solve an equation without inverting a matrix because the equations said the same thing and the determinant of the augmented matrix was 0.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1682889535119.png

I don't understand how they solved,
1682889573062.png

Because we would have to take the inverse of both side which would give the inverse of the matrix ##2 \times 2## matrix on the left hand side which dose not have an inverse.

Dose anybody please know how they did this?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In equation form, we have ##-6 x +6 y =0 \iff x - y = 0## (dividing both sides by -6) for the first line. Likewise for the second line, ##5 x -5 y =0 \iff x - y = 0## (dividing both sides by 5). So both equations say the same thing.
Now you can see what they were doing in matrix form and why there is no need to include ##x## and ##y## where they were manipulating the augmented matrices. It really represents the same thing.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #3
There isn't a single solution for the eigenvector(s). That's why you can't invert that matrix. That's how it is with eigenvalue problems. In fact, that's how you find the eigenvalues with the characteristic equation |AI|=0, i.e. find λ that makes AI not invertable.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #4
ChiralSuperfields said:
Dose anybody please know how they did this?
Again, that's "does".

Your thread title indicates that you are to find the eigenspace for a matrix. IOW, the set of all nonzero vectors x (in ##\mathbb R^2## here) such that Ax = λx, or equivalently, ##(A - \lambda I)\mathbf x = \mathbf 0##.
In order for x to be nonzero, the determinant of ##A - \lambda I## must be zero.

I'm guessing that your textbook is probably explaining this. Are you skipping over parts of the textbook?
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016 and berkeman
  • #5
Thank you @FactChecker , @DaveE and @Mark44!

I think I understand now :)

@Mark44, yes, sadly, I have to skip over parts of the textbook as the course jumps from one topic to another. Also sorry I did not see the dose again.
 

FAQ: Finding the eigenspace for this value of lambda

What is an eigenspace?

An eigenspace of a matrix associated with a particular eigenvalue is the set of all eigenvectors corresponding to that eigenvalue, combined with the zero vector. It is essentially the null space of the matrix \(A - \lambda I\), where \(A\) is the matrix and \(\lambda\) is the eigenvalue.

How do you find the eigenspace for a given eigenvalue?

To find the eigenspace for a given eigenvalue \(\lambda\), you need to solve the equation \((A - \lambda I) \mathbf{x} = 0\). This involves subtracting \(\lambda\) times the identity matrix \(I\) from the matrix \(A\), and then finding the null space of the resulting matrix. The solution set to this equation gives you the eigenspace.

What is the significance of the eigenspace?

The eigenspace provides insight into the structure of the matrix and its transformations. Eigenvectors in the eigenspace remain in the same span after the transformation by the matrix, scaled by the eigenvalue. This property is useful in various applications such as stability analysis, quantum mechanics, and principal component analysis.

Can the eigenspace be empty?

No, the eigenspace cannot be empty. By definition, it always contains at least the zero vector. If a matrix has an eigenvalue, there must be at least one non-zero eigenvector associated with it, meaning the eigenspace will have more than just the zero vector.

How do you verify if a vector belongs to an eigenspace?

To verify if a vector \(\mathbf{v}\) belongs to the eigenspace of an eigenvalue \(\lambda\), you can check if \((A - \lambda I) \mathbf{v} = 0\). If this equation holds true, then \(\mathbf{v}\) is indeed an eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue \(\lambda\) and thus belongs to the eigenspace.

Back
Top