Finding the integral of t e^(-lambda t) from t=0 to t=infinity

  • Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
So, in summary, when evaluating the integral of te^(-lambda*t), we need to be careful of the dimensions and include a factor of lambda. Additionally, when taking the antiderivative, we need to make sure to include this factor in order to get the correct result.
  • #1
stunner5000pt
1,465
4
[tex] \int_{0}^{infty} t e^{-\lambda t} \lambda dt [/tex][tex] \frac{1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} (1 + t \lambda) \right]_{0}^{\infty} = \frac{1}{\lambda} [/tex]

is this corect??

for hte infinity part we don't have to worry since the 1/exponential term goes to zero as does the t/exponential term. For t = 0 however t/exponentail is zero and what is left is 1/lambda
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You're missing a factor of lambda. It's helpful if you think of t as being a time, so that lambda is a frequency and the integral needs to have dimensions of time^2.
 
  • #3
StatusX said:
You're missing a factor of lambda. It's helpful if you think of t as being a time, so that lambda is a frequency and the integral needs to have dimensions of time^2.
how am i missing it??

did i not do everything right??

see the whole work

[tex] \frac{-1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} (1 + t \lambda) \right]_{0}^{\infty} = \lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} \left(\frac{-1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} \right) - \left( \frac{-1}{\lambda}\right) - 0 \right) = \frac{1}{\lambda} [/tex]

where does the extra fact oro lambda come from??
 
Last edited:
  • #4
The problem is before the first step you've shown, since the dimensions are wrong there as well. How did you take the antiderivative?
 
  • #5
are u talkin about hte negative sign i was missing??

i did integration by parts..
 
  • #6
No, you're missing a factor of lambda in the antiderivative. Go back through it step through step.
 
  • #7
since we are on this what about
[tex] \int_{T}^{\infty} e^{-\lambda t} \lambda dt = -e^{-\lambda t} |_{T}^{\infty} = 0 + e^{-\lambda T} [/tex]

am i missing a fact or of lambda here too.. WHY??
 
Last edited:
  • #8
StatusX said:
No, you're missing a factor of lambda in the antiderivative. Go back through it step through step.

i typed out the question wrong...

it should be e^\lambda t * lambda
 
  • #9
I'm confused. Your antiderivative in the first step is right except for a factor of lambda. If you meant for there not to be a t multiplying the exponential, then your original answer is completely wrong. So which is it?
 
  • #10
Ok let's restart

[tex] \int_{0}^{\infty} t e^{-\lambda t} \lambda dt [/tex]

and the integral is
[tex] \frac{-1}{\lambda e^{\lambda t}} (1 + t \lambda) \right]_{0}^{\infty} = \frac{1}{\lambda} [/tex]

good?
 
  • #11
Yea, that's right.
 

FAQ: Finding the integral of t e^(-lambda t) from t=0 to t=infinity

What is the formula for finding the integral of t e^(-lambda t) from t=0 to t=infinity?

The formula for finding the integral of t e^(-lambda t) from t=0 to t=infinity is: ∫ t e^(-lambda t) dt = -(1/lambda)^2 * e^(-lambda t) * (lambda * t + 1), where lambda is a constant.

How do I solve this integral?

To solve this integral, you can use the substitution method or integration by parts. The substitution method involves substituting u = -lambda t and du = -lambda dt, while integration by parts involves using the formula ∫ u dv = u*v - ∫ v du, where u = t and dv = e^(-lambda t) dt.

What does the limit of the integral represent?

The limit of the integral represents the area under the curve of the function t e^(-lambda t) from t=0 to t=infinity. It represents the total value or total quantity of the function over the specified interval.

How does the value of lambda affect the integral?

The value of lambda affects the integral by changing the rate at which the function t e^(-lambda t) decreases. A larger lambda value will result in a faster decrease, while a smaller lambda value will result in a slower decrease.

Can this integral be solved using numerical methods?

Yes, this integral can be solved using numerical methods such as the trapezoidal rule or Simpson's rule. These methods involve dividing the interval into smaller subintervals and approximating the area under the curve using the trapezoid or Simpson's rule formula.

Back
Top