MHB Finding the Product of Roots of a Polynomial with Complex and Real Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the product of the polynomial function values at the roots of a given polynomial \( p(x) = x^5 + x^2 + 1 \) and another function \( q(x) = x^2 - 2 \). The original poster struggled with applying Vieta's formulas due to the complexity of the roots, which include one real root and four complex roots. A solution was provided, showing that the product \( q(r_1) \cdot q(r_2) \cdot q(r_3) \cdot q(r_4) \cdot q(r_5) \) can be calculated as \( -23 \) by evaluating the polynomial at \( \sqrt{2} \) and \( -\sqrt{2} \). The discussion concludes with appreciation for the responses received, highlighting the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematics.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

It's me again...I find this problem to be very interesting yet very difficult to me. I tried to approach it using the Vieta's formula, knowing the given function $p(x)$ has only one real root and 4 complex roots, where I let the 4 complex roots be $a\pm bi$ and $c\pm di$, but it failed me. I start to think this must be a problem that is not compatible to my level and thus I post it here hoping to find someone who will be interested with it and solve it for me...:o

Thanks in advance!(Sun)

Problem:

Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.
The product $$q(r_1)q(r_2)q(r_3)q(r_4)q(r_5)$$ is a symmetric polynomial in $r_1,\dots,r_5$, and every symmetric polynomial can be expressed through elementary symmetric polynomials, which, in turn, can be expressed through the coefficients of $p(x)$ by the Vieta's formulas. Finding this expression is left as an exercise. (Smile)
 
anemone said:
Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.
If $y = x^2 - 2$ then $x = (y+2)^{1/2}$, and $x^5+x^2+1 = (y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. So if $r_1,\ldots,r_5$ are the roots of $p(x)$ then $q(r_1),\ldots,q(r_5)$ are the roots of $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. But if $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3 = 0$ then $(y+2)^5 = (y+3)^2$, so that $y^5 + \ldots + (2^5-3^2) = 0$. The product of the roots of that polynomial is the negative of the constant term, namely $-(32-9) = -23.$
 
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

It's me again...I find this problem to be very interesting yet very difficult to me. I tried to approach it using the Vieta's formula, knowing the given function $p(x)$ has only one real root and 4 complex roots, where I let the 4 complex roots be $a\pm bi$ and $c\pm di$, but it failed me. I start to think this must be a problem that is not compatible to my level and thus I post it here hoping to find someone who will be interested with it and solve it for me...:o

Thanks in advance!(Sun)

Problem:

Let $$p(x)=x^5+x^2+1$$ have roots $r_1$, $r_2$, $r_3$, $r_4$, and $r_5$. Let $$q(x)=x^2-2$$. Determine the product of $$q(r_1)\cdot q(r_2)\cdot q(r_3)\cdot q(r_4)\cdot q(r_5)$$.

Is... $\displaystyle p(x) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (x-r_{i})\ (1)$

... and... $\displaystyle q(x) = (x-\sqrt{2}) (x+\sqrt{2})\ (2)$

... so that... $\displaystyle \prod_{i=1}^{5} q(r_{i}) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} - \sqrt{2}) \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} + \sqrt{2}) = - p(\sqrt{2})\ p(-\sqrt{2}) = (3 - 2^{\frac{5}{2}})\ (3 + 2^{\frac{5}{2}}) = 9 - 32 = -23\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
Evgeny.Makarov said:
The product $$q(r_1)q(r_2)q(r_3)q(r_4)q(r_5)$$ is a symmetric polynomial in $r_1,\dots,r_5$, and every symmetric polynomial can be expressed through elementary symmetric polynomials, which, in turn, can be expressed through the coefficients of $p(x)$ by the Vieta's formulas. Finding this expression is left as an exercise. (Smile)

Opalg said:
If $y = x^2 - 2$ then $x = (y+2)^{1/2}$, and $x^5+x^2+1 = (y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. So if $r_1,\ldots,r_5$ are the roots of $p(x)$ then $q(r_1),\ldots,q(r_5)$ are the roots of $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3$. But if $(y+2)^{5/2} + y+3 = 0$ then $(y+2)^5 = (y+3)^2$, so that $y^5 + \ldots + (2^5-3^2) = 0$. The product of the roots of that polynomial is the negative of the constant term, namely $-(32-9) = -23.$

chisigma said:
Is... $\displaystyle p(x) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (x-r_{i})\ (1)$

... and... $\displaystyle q(x) = (x-\sqrt{2}) (x+\sqrt{2})\ (2)$

... so that... $\displaystyle \prod_{i=1}^{5} q(r_{i}) = \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} - \sqrt{2}) \prod_{i=1}^{5} (r_{i} + \sqrt{2}) = - p(\sqrt{2})\ p(\sqrt{2}) = (3 - 2^{\frac{5}{2}})\ (3 + 2^{\frac{5}{2}}) = 9 - 32 = -23\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Thank you, Evgeny.Makarov, Opalg and chisigma for the reply!

I truly appreciate the three of you taking the time out to reply to this thread because I learned a great deal from the replies...

I love you guys!(Inlove)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top