Finding the Right Revisiting a Two-Year-Old Problem

  • MHB
  • Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date
In summary, the original solution to the attached problem is correct. The experiment involves throwing two darts and the probability of an odd outcome is the sum of the probabilities of the first dart being odd and the second even, or the first even and the second odd. However, the method used to calculate the probabilities is flawed because it assumes the outcomes when throwing the two darts simultaneously, which is not given in the problem. Therefore, the correct approach is to consider the individual outcomes of each dart and not the combined outcomes.
  • #1
veronica1999
61
0
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?
 

Attachments

  • prob.pdf
    182.4 KB · Views: 83
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
veronica1999 said:
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?

Your original solution is correct.

You can think of the darts as thrown one after the other so the probability of an odd outcome is the sum of the probabilities that the first is odd and the second even and that the first is even and the second odd.

CB
 
  • #3
veronica1999 said:
I solved this attached problem two years ago and now I am starting to think the solution is wrong.
And the problem is flawed. Can someone please help clarify my understanding?

Hi veronica1999,

As CaptainBlack had already told, your first answer is correct. Let me explain how I think about it.

What are the events and outcomes of this experiment? The problem says,

The probability that a dart will hit a given region is proportional to the area of the region.

Outcome 1: A dart hitting a region numbered "1".

Outcome 2: A dart hitting a region numbered "2".

We know the probabilities of these outcomes.

Then there are various events that could occur, for example the first dart hitting the outer region numbered 2 and the second dart hitting a inner region numbered 1. Out of these events we are interested about the events that have sum=3.

Suppose if you throw the two darts at the same time, and moreover they hit the board at the same instance. Then what will be the outcomes of this experiment? We may be able to define outcomes such as,

Outcome 1: The darts achieving a sum of "3".

Outcome 2: The darts not achieving a sum of "3".

However do we know the probabilities of these outcomes? No. You are given only the probabilities that a dart hitting a certain region, not the probabilities of the outcomes that occur when the two darts hit the board together.

What you have done wrong in the second method is that you have taken your outcomes as,

Outcome 1: A dart hitting a region numbered "1".

Outcome 2: A dart hitting a region numbered "2".

and done some calculations. But finally you have thought about the outcomes again as,

Outcome 1: The darts achieving a sum of "3".

Outcome 2: The darts not achieving a sum of "3".

The summary is, you can throw the darts at once, however the probabilities of the outcomes that you will get, you don't know.

I hope my explanation is clear enough to clarify your doubts.

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 

FAQ: Finding the Right Revisiting a Two-Year-Old Problem

What is "Finding the Right Revisiting a Two-Year-Old Problem"?

"Finding the Right Revisiting a Two-Year-Old Problem" is a scientific concept that involves revisiting a problem that was initially explored or studied two years ago. This can include conducting new experiments, analyzing new data, or using updated methods to gain a better understanding of the problem.

Why is revisiting a two-year-old problem important?

Revisiting a two-year-old problem is important because new discoveries and advancements in technology can provide new insights and solutions to the problem. It also allows for a deeper understanding of the problem and can lead to further advancements and developments in the field.

How do scientists determine which problems to revisit?

Scientists may determine which problems to revisit based on the significance and impact of the problem, new information or data that has become available, and the potential for new discoveries and advancements in the field.

What are some challenges scientists face when revisiting a two-year-old problem?

Some challenges scientists may face when revisiting a two-year-old problem include the need for updated resources and equipment, potential changes in the research team, and the possibility of conflicting or inconclusive results compared to the initial study.

How can revisiting a two-year-old problem contribute to the overall scientific knowledge?

Revisiting a two-year-old problem can contribute to the overall scientific knowledge by building upon previous research and expanding our understanding of the problem. It can also lead to new discoveries and advancements in the field and can inspire further research and studies in related areas.

Similar threads

Back
Top