MHB Finding the Value of $f(84)$ in an Integer Function

AI Thread Summary
To find the value of f(84) in the given integer function, the function is defined piecewise, with f(x) equaling x-3 for x greater than or equal to 1000, and f(f(x+5)) for x less than 1000. Since 84 is less than 1000, the recursive nature of the function means that f(84) requires evaluating f(f(89)), and this process continues with increasing values until reaching a point where x is greater than or equal to 1000. The function's recursive structure suggests that it will eventually lead to a base case that can be calculated directly. The final value of f(84) is determined through this iterative process, ultimately yielding a specific integer result.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$\text{given } :x \in\mathbb{Z}$

$f(x)= \begin{cases}x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\f\big [f(x+5)\big ]& x<1000 \end{cases} $

$\text{find } :\,\, f(84)$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
$\text{given } :x \in\mathbb{Z}$

$f(x)= \begin{cases}x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\f\big [f(x+5)\big ]& x<1000 \end{cases} $

$\text{find } :\,\, f(84)$

Lemma
$f(x)= \begin{cases}
x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\
997 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ even} \\
998 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ odd} \\
\end{cases} $

Proof
Use full induction going down.
Initial condition: we can verify that it is true for any $x \ge 997$.
Induction step: suppose it is true for any $x$ and some $y$ with $y < x$ and $y< 997$.
Then we need to distinguish the cases that $y$ is even or $y$ is odd.
When we fill in what we already have for $f(y)$ it follows that the given formula is also true for $f(y)$, which completes the proof.

Using the lemma we find that $f(84) = 997$.
 
I like Serena said:
Lemma
$f(x)= \begin{cases}
x-3 & x \geq 1000 \\
997 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ even} \\
998 & x<1000 \text{ and $x$ odd} \\
\end{cases} $

Proof
Use full induction going down.
Initial condition: we can verify that it is true for any $x \ge 997$.
Induction step: suppose it is true for any $x$ and some $y$ with $y < x$ and $y< 997$.
Then we need to distinguish the cases that $y$ is even or $y$ is odd.
When we fill in what we already have for $f(y)$ it follows that the given formula is also true for $f(y)$, which completes the proof.

Using the lemma we find that $f(84) = 997$.
I like Serena :very smart induction (Clapping)
 
My approach is different from I like serena

we evaluate f(999) through f(995)

f(999) = 998
f(998) = 997
f(997) = 998
f(996) = 997
f(995) = 998

now f(85)= f^183 (998) notation for f is applied 183

applying f twice gives 998 and so on applying 182 time gives 998 and then once more gives 997 which is the ans
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top