Finding the value of lambda so that two lines are parallel

In summary: It was (almost) fine up to here:##\hat {PR} = \frac{-3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k}{\sqrt{49}} = \frac{2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k}{\sqrt{20 + \lambda^2}}##What went wrong after that is that squaring both sides is equivalent to insisting that both vectors have the same length - but you'd already made them unit vectors, so that was true independent of ##\lambda##.
  • #1
member 731016
Homework Statement
I am try to understand how they the solution got their answer as my method is not giving the correct answer.
Relevant Equations
##\textbf {PR} = -3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k##

##\textbf {RS} = 2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k##
For this (ii),
1681245369416.png


The solution is ##\lambda = \frac{4}{3}##, however when I tried solving the problem I did not get their answer. Dose somebody please guide me to their solution and tell me what I did wrong with my method below:

##\textbf {PR} = -3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k##
##\textbf {RS} = 2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k##
##\hat {PR} = \frac{\textbf {PR}}{|PR|} = \hat {RS} = \frac{\textbf {RS}}{|RS|}##
##\hat {PR} = \frac{-3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k}{\sqrt{49}} = \frac{2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k}{\sqrt{20 + \lambda^2}}##

Then square both sides (which I think we then use the scalar product) giving:
##\frac{9 + 36 + 4}{49} = \frac{4 + 16 + \lambda^2}{20 + \lambda^2}##
##\frac{49}{49} = \frac{20 + \lambda^2}{20 + \lambda^2}##
##1 = 1##

Many thanks!

[Moderator's note: moved from a technical forum.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You found that the length of a unit vector is 1 (twice).
How do you show that two vectors are parallel?
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #3
Frabjous said:
You found that the length of a unit vector is 1 (twice).
How do you show that two vectors are parallel?
Thank you for your reply @Frabjous!

The two vectors should be parallel if they are multiples of each other by some constant.

Many thanks!
 
  • #4
ChiralSuperfields said:
The two vectors should be parallel if they are multiples of each other by some constant.
Don’t normalize the vectors. Find the constant for each component. They should all be equal.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #5
Frabjous said:
Don’t normalize the vectors. Find the constant for each component. They should all be equal.
Thank you for your reply @Frabjous!

I have gotten the correct solution :) However, I am wondering why my first method did not work. Is it because there is no other way of solving for lambda without squaring both sides which makes the numerator equal to the denominator for each unit vector.

Many thanks!
 
  • #6
ChiralSuperfields said:
I have gotten the correct solution :) However, I am wondering why my first method did not work. Is it because there is no other way of solving for lambda without squaring both sides which makes the numerator equal to the denominator for each unit vector.
As already noted, you absolutely don't need to generate unit vectors. You did a lot of work for no noticeable gain.

ChiralSuperfields said:
##\textbf {PR} = -3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k##
##\textbf {RS} = 2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k##
Another point that was already noted is that for two vectors to be parallel (or antiparallel -- pointing in opposite directions), each one must be a nonzero scalar multiple of the other.
For the vectors above one can determine by nothing more than inspection that the scalar multiple must be -3/2. So ##-2 = -3/2 \times \lambda##, or ##\lambda = (-2)(-2/3) = 4/3##.
ChiralSuperfields said:
The solution is
##\lambda = \frac{4}{3}##, however when I tried solving the problem I did not get their answer. Dose somebody please guide me to their solution and tell me what I did wrong with my method below:

##\textbf {PR} = -3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k##
##\textbf {RS} = 2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k##
You don't need to do any of the stuff below.
ChiralSuperfields said:
##\hat {PR} = \frac{\textbf {PR}}{|PR|} = \hat {RS} = \frac{\textbf {RS}}{|RS|}##
##\hat {PR} = \frac{-3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k}{\sqrt{49}} = \frac{2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k}{\sqrt{20 + \lambda^2}}##

Then square both sides (which I think we then use the scalar product) giving:
##\frac{9 + 36 + 4}{49} = \frac{4 + 16 + \lambda^2}{20 + \lambda^2}##
##\frac{49}{49} = \frac{20 + \lambda^2}{20 + \lambda^2}##
##1 = 1##
Aside from the fact that the above work is not useful, it's even less useful to end up with an equation that is trivially true; i.e., that 1 is equal to itself.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes member 731016
  • #7
ChiralSuperfields said:
Is it because there is no other way of solving for lambda without squaring both sides which makes the numerator equal to the denominator for each unit vector.
It was (almost) fine up to here:
ChiralSuperfields said:
##\hat {PR} = \frac{-3\hat i + 6\hat j - 2\hat k}{\sqrt{49}} = \frac{2\hat i - 4\hat j + \lambda \hat k}{\sqrt{20 + \lambda^2}}##
What went wrong after that is that squaring both sides is equivalent to insisting that both vectors have the same length - but you'd already made them unit vectors, so that was true independent of ##\lambda##.

You could have compared the coefficients of ##\hat i##, which would hopefully have flagged to you why I wrote "almost", which is that ##\hat{PR}=-\hat{RS}## because they point in opposite directions. Or you could have required that ##\hat{PR}\cdot\hat{RS}=\pm 1##. Either is more work than the method already mentioned of noting that for parallel vectors the coefficients of the basis vectors need to be in the same ratio, so ##\frac{-3}2=\frac 6{-4}=\frac{-2}\lambda##.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016

FAQ: Finding the value of lambda so that two lines are parallel

What is the general condition for two lines to be parallel?

Two lines are parallel if their direction vectors are proportional. This means that the ratio of the corresponding components of the direction vectors must be equal.

How do you find the direction vector of a line?

The direction vector of a line can be found from its parametric form. If a line is given by \( \mathbf{r} = \mathbf{a} + t\mathbf{b} \), where \( \mathbf{a} \) is a point on the line and \( \mathbf{b} \) is the direction vector, then \( \mathbf{b} \) is the direction vector of the line.

What is the role of lambda in determining parallelism?

Lambda (λ) is often used as a scalar parameter. When finding the value of λ, it ensures that the direction vectors of the two lines are proportional. This proportionality confirms that the lines are parallel.

How do you set up the equations to solve for lambda?

To find λ, set up the equations by equating the ratios of the corresponding components of the direction vectors of the two lines. For example, if the direction vectors are \( \mathbf{d_1} = (a, b, c) \) and \( \mathbf{d_2} = (d, e, f) \), then solve for λ in the equations \( \frac{a}{d} = \frac{b}{e} = \frac{c}{f} \).

What if the lines are given in different forms?

If the lines are given in different forms (e.g., parametric and vector forms), first convert them to a common form to identify the direction vectors. Once you have the direction vectors, you can proceed to find the value of λ to determine if the lines are parallel.

Similar threads

Back
Top