MHB Finding the Value of $n$ in a Rhombus $DBEF$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, the geometric properties of rhombus $DBEF$ formed within square $ABCD$ are analyzed. It is established that $CF$ is parallel to $BD$ and that $DF$ equals $DB$. The relationship between angles is highlighted, specifically that $\angle BDF$ is $n$ times $\angle F$, with $n$ being a natural number. The objective is to determine the value of $n$. The solution involves applying properties of angles in rhombuses and squares to derive the value of $n$.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$ABCD $ is a square,$CF//BD$, and $DF=DB$,point $E,$ is on $CF$
given :$DBEF$ is a rhombus
if $\angle BDF=n\angle F$(here :$n\in N)$
please find :$n=?$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
$ABCD $ is a square,$CF//BD$, and $DF=DB$,point $E,$ is on $CF$
given :$DBEF$ is a rhombus
if $\angle BDF=n\angle F$(here :$n\in N)$
please find :$n=?$
 

Attachments

  • Rhombus.jpg
    Rhombus.jpg
    24.4 KB · Views: 98
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top