Finding Thevenin Equivalent Circuit for Complex Network

In summary: In the first system, the left matrix is:15+j5 & 15+j9\\15+j9 & 15+j19In the second system, the left matrix is:15+j5 & 15+j9\\15+j9 & 15+j19You can also solve the system by writing a couple of loop equations. Replace the j2 current source in parallel with the 5 ohm resistor with a j10 voltage source in series with a 5 ohm resistor.Consider two loop currents, I1 and I2. I1 is a clockwise loop passing through the j10 voltage source, the 5 ohm and 10 ohm resistors, the j5 inductor, and the short
  • #1
Lunat1c
66
0

Homework Statement



I wish to obtain the Thevenin equivalent for the network show in the attachment between the terminals a and b.

2. The attempt at a solution

First I considered the voltage source alone (replaced current source by an open circuit).

[tex] I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \nfrac{20}{5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees [/tex]

[tex] \therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees [/tex]

Then I considered the current source alone (replaced the voltage source by a short):

Current through upper branch = [tex] \frac { 2A\angle90\degrees (10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.282A\angle29.83\degrees [/tex]

[tex] \therefore V_{AB}^2 = (0.282\angle29.83\degrees)(j10 -j4 + j4) = 2.82V\angle119.83\degrees [/tex]

[tex] V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.529V\angle-17.25\degrees [/tex]

Can someone please check this for me? I'm not sure whether I did some mistake and I need to know whether I understood these.

Thank you for your time,

Lunat1c
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 384
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Lunat1c said:

Homework Statement



I wish to obtain the Thevenin equivalent for the network show in the attachment between the terminals a and b.

2. The attempt at a solution

First I considered the voltage source alone (replaced current source by an open circuit).

[tex] I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \nfrac{20}{5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees [/tex]

[tex] \therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees [/tex]

Then I considered the current source alone (replaced the voltage source by a short):

Current through upper branch = [tex] \frac { 2A\angle90\degrees (10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.282A\angle29.83\degrees [/tex]

[tex] \therefore V_{AB}^2 = (0.282\angle29.83\degrees)(j10 -j4 + j4) = 2.82V\angle119.83\degrees [/tex]

[tex] V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.529V\angle-17.25\degrees [/tex]

Can someone please check this for me? I'm not sure whether I did some mistake and I need to know whether I understood these.

Thank you for your time,

Lunat1c

Your first calculation should be:

[tex] I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \frac{20}{5+10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)}[/tex]

Also, in this calculation, there is an error in your arithmetic:

Current through upper branch = [tex] \frac { 2A\angle90\degrees (10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.282A\angle29.83\degrees [/tex]

I get:

Current through upper branch = [tex] 2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees [/tex]

And, of course, these errors propagate into subsequent calculations.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
The Electrician said:
Current through upper branch = [tex] 2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees [/tex]

And, of course, these errors propagate into subsequent calculations.

Ok, I agree with that part, found the mistake. However, do you agree with the rest of the working (especially the way I considered the mutual inductances)? I really wish to confirm whether I have the correct final answer or not. Now I got [tex]V_{AB}=9.225V\angle-13.79[/tex]
 
  • #4
For the final answer, I get [tex]11.1156V\angle {-9.722} ^ \circ [/tex]

Your handling of the mutual inductance seems essentially ok, but without showing all the calculations you showed in your first post, with the errors I pointed out corrected, I can't tell where you went wrong.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
[tex]
I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \frac {20} {5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees
[/tex]

[tex]
\therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees
[/tex] [tex]
2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees
[/tex]

[tex] V_{AB}^2 = (0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees)(10 +j5 + j10 -j4 + 8j) = 8.87\angle100.53 [/tex]

[tex] V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.33V\angle17.76 [/tex]

I can't see where I'm wrong...
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Go have a look in post #2 where I said:

"Your first calculation should be:"

You're missing a -j4 term in the denominator of that V/Zt calculation.
 
  • #7
Lunat1c said:
[tex]
I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \frac {20} {5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees
[/tex]

[tex]
\therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees
[/tex]


[tex]
2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees
[/tex]

[tex] V_{AB}^2 = (0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees)(10 +j5 + j10 -j4 + 8j) = 8.87\angle100.53 [/tex]

[tex] V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.33V\angle17.76 [/tex]

I can't see where I'm wrong...

I see another error. You should have:

[tex] V_{AB}^2 = (0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees)(j10 -j4 + 4j) = 4.131\angle128.29 [/tex]
 
  • #8
You're right. Thanks a lot, I really appreciate you taking the time to go through my working.
 
  • #9
You can also solve the system by writing a couple of loop equations. Replace the j2 current source in parallel with the 5 ohm resistor with a j10 voltage source in series with a 5 ohm resistor.

Consider two loop currents, I1 and I2. I1 is a clockwise loop passing through the j10 voltage source, the 5 ohm and 10 ohm resistors, the j5 inductor, and the short across the a-b terminals. I2 is a clockwise loop going around the entire circuit.

Then to solve for the two currents, solve this system. I1 will be the short circuit current through the shorted a-b terminals.

[tex]\left[ \begin{array}{2}15+j5 & 15+j9\\15+j9 & 15+j19\end{array}\right]\left[ \begin{array}{1}I_1\\I_2\\\end{array}\right]=\left[ \begin{array}{1}j10\\-20+j10\\\end{array}\right][/tex]

To find Zth, the Thevenin impedance, short the 20 volt source and the j10 source; connect a 1 volt source to the a-b terminals. The system then becomes:

[tex]\left[ \begin{array}{2}15+j5 & 15+j9\\15+j9 & 15+j19\end{array}\right]\left[ \begin{array}{1}I_1\\I_2\\\end{array}\right]=\left[ \begin{array}{1}1\\0\\\end{array}\right][/tex]

The solution to this system will give a current I1 whose reciprocal is numerically equal to the Thevenin impedance.

Multiply the current I1 from the first system solution, by the Thevenin impedance, which is 1/I1 from the second system, and you will have Vth, the Thevenin voltage.

This is how I solved your problem initially, and then examined your method to see where your errors were.

Edit:
It looks like the tex engine didn't properly format the 2x2 matrix on the left of the two systems above. Where you see a 4x1 matrix, convert it to a 2x2 by taking the terms row wise, two at a time.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Finding Thevenin Equivalent Circuit for Complex Network

1. What is a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit?

A Thevenin Equivalent Circuit is a simplified representation of a complex circuit that contains a single voltage source and a single resistance. It is used to analyze and understand the behavior of a circuit, and is particularly useful for solving problems involving voltage and current in a circuit.

2. How is a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit calculated?

To calculate a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit, you must first determine the Thevenin voltage (VTH) and the Thevenin resistance (RTH) of the original circuit. The Thevenin voltage is the open-circuit voltage at the output terminals of the circuit, and the Thevenin resistance is the equivalent resistance seen from the output terminals with all voltage sources removed. Once these values are determined, the Thevenin Equivalent Circuit can be drawn with VTH as the voltage source and RTH as the resistance.

3. What are the benefits of using a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit?

Thevenin Equivalent Circuits provide a simplified representation of a complex circuit, making it easier to analyze and understand. They also allow for easier calculations of voltage and current in a circuit, and can be used to predict how the circuit will behave under different conditions. Additionally, Thevenin Equivalent Circuits can help identify faulty components in a circuit and make troubleshooting more efficient.

4. Can a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit be used for any type of circuit?

Thevenin Equivalent Circuits can be used for linear circuits, which are circuits that follow Ohm's Law. This means that the current in the circuit is directly proportional to the voltage, and the resistance remains constant. Non-linear circuits, such as circuits with diodes or transistors, cannot be simplified using Thevenin's Theorem.

5. What is the difference between a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit and a Norton Equivalent Circuit?

A Thevenin Equivalent Circuit and a Norton Equivalent Circuit are two different methods of simplifying a complex circuit. While a Thevenin Equivalent Circuit uses a single voltage source and a single resistance, a Norton Equivalent Circuit uses a single current source and a single conductance. Both methods can be used to analyze a circuit, but one may be more useful than the other depending on the problem at hand.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top