Finding Work Done by Friction on a Sliding Block Against a Wedge

In summary: Yes, so the equation becomes $$\omega r \frac{\text{d}\omega}{\text{d}\theta} + \mu r \omega^2 = g \cos \theta - \mu g \sin \theta$$ So, I could solve this for ##\dot{\theta}(\theta)## and input into my W-E energy...?Or is it better to solve for ##\omega(\theta)##?It is better to solve for ##\omega(\theta)## since I don't know ##\dot{\theta}(\theta)##, I only know ##\dot{\theta}(t)##.Hi TSny,It is better to solve for ##\omega(\theta
  • #36
TSny said:
Yes, I think so. Good..
Thank you.

TSny said:
Check the sign of C.

I got that.It should be -3g/2.
Please tell me what to do next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Yes, -3g/2.

Think about what you are trying to find and how that is related to y.
 
  • #38
Satvik Pandey said:
Thank you.
I got that.It should be -3g/2.
Please tell me what to do next?

The C is not correct yet.

ehild
 
  • #39
ehild said:
The C is no correct yet.

ehild

Oops. Yes, there's still something missing in the expression for C. Thanks.
 
  • #40
I think it should be -3g/2r.
 
  • #41
It is all right now. Now remember what y is, and what you need to the solution of the original problem (read it again).

ehild
 
  • #42
I need to find the velocity of block when it makes 90° with horizontal.

So ω2=[itex]\frac{9.8}{4}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}[/itex]

What is the value of e[itex]^{-\pi/2}[/itex].
Sorry but I don't know its value.

Is e[itex]^{-\pi/2}[/itex] equal to 0.021 ?
 
Last edited:
  • #43
You have got a calculator, don't you? And there is pi on it, and you can calculate the value of an exponential function. Maybe, with inverse ln (shift ln).

And your formula is wrong, r is missing and why is 4 in the denominator of the second term?

ehild
 
  • #44
ehild said:
You have got a calculator, don't you? And there is pi on it, and you can calculate the value of an exponential function. Maybe, with inverse ln (shift ln).

And your formula is wrong, r is missing and why is 4 in the denominator of the second term?

ehild

I substituted r=2.It was given in the question.

Is epi/2=11.5703463164?
 
  • #45
Satvik Pandey said:
I substituted r=2.It was given in the question.

Is epi/2=11.5703463164?

In the question, r was given as 200 cm.

You need e-pi/2.
 
  • #46
ω2=[itex]\frac{9.8}{4}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}[/itex]

I found e[itex]^{-\pi/2}[/itex]=0.0216

On putting values I found I found ω=1.5136

As V=rω

So V=3.02136

S=1.05m

t=[itex]\sqrt{\frac{2S}{g}}[/itex]=0.429

Velocity of block makes 90° with horizontal at the he point at which it leaves the wedge.
So vertical component of V is 0.
So x=Vt=1.40m=140cm.
 
  • #47
ehild said:
In the question, r was given as 200 cm.

You need e-pi/2.

I changed its unit into meter as the value of 'g' that I have used is 9.8[itex]\frac{m}{s2}[/itex]
So 200cm=2m
 
  • #48
Satvik Pandey said:
ω2=[itex]\frac{9.8}{4}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}[/itex]

I found e[itex]^{-\pi/2}[/itex]=0.0216

On putting values I found I found ω=1.5136

As V=rω

So V=3.02136

S=1.05m

t=[itex]\sqrt{\frac{2S}{g}}[/itex]=0.429

Velocity of block makes 90° with horizontal at the he point at which it leaves the wedge.
So vertical component of V is 0.
So x=Vt=1.40m=140cm.

It is correct in principle, but the numerical values are not. [itex]e^{-\pi/2}=0.20788 [/itex]
How did you get 0.0216? You forgot the parentheses and calculated ##e^{-\pi}/2##?

Also, t=0.4629 s instead of 0.429,
and v makes 0° angle with the horizontal, instead of 90° but these are typos.
And you were right about r=2 m, somehow I thought of 200 mm instead of 200 cm.

The problem was far above high-school level, you needed knowledge about differential equations.
You solved it at the end, congratulation, but it would be more useful for you to practice on problems which are more elementary.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #49
ω2=[itex]\frac{9.8}{4}[/itex]-[itex]\frac{29.4}{4}e^{-\pi/2}[/itex]

ω=0.96025
As v=rω
So v=1.920

Since t=0.4629
So x=1.920*0.4629
=0.889 m
And this is approximately equal to 89 cm.

Got correct answer :smile:
 
  • #50
ehild said:
It is correct in principle, but the numerical values are not. [itex]e^{-\pi/2}=0.20788 [/itex]
How did you get 0.0216? You forgot the parentheses and calculated ##e^{-\pi}/2##?
ehild

Yes I forgot the parentheses.Sorry for inconvenience.

ehild said:
Also, t=0.4629 s instead of 0.429,
and v makes 0° angle with the horizontal, instead of 90° but these are typos.

ehild
Oh! my typing mistakes. When would they end.:cry:

ehild said:
The problem was far above high-school level, you needed knowledge about differential equations.
You solved it at the end, congratulation, but it would be more useful for you to practice on problems which are more elementary.

ehild

How did you find that I am in high-school?.Is this a prediction?
I have solved similar types of question but in those questions friction was not involved.
When I saw this question I developed curiosity.
Yes,this question needed knowledge about differential equations.
And I do not have much knowledge about it.But I have some knowledge about basic integration and differentiation. I found the method to solve linear differential equation in a secondary school mathematics book.I just applied that method and I got correct answer.:smile:

ehild said:
it would be more useful for you to practice on problems which are more elementary
I will follow your suggestion.

Thank you ehild for helping me.I couldn't have solved this without your help.
 
  • #51
Thank you ehild,TSny,mfb,CAF123 for helping me to find the solution.
 
  • #52
Satvik Pandey said:
How did you find that I am in high-school?.

I saw your Profile :smile:

You become a real scientist if you understand what you do. Maths and Physics are not mere collections of recipes. You have to start from the bases and build up your knowledge step by step. Every step must follow logically from your previous knowledge, and then you would feel a new theorem or proof easy as if you could have discovered them by yourself.

ehild
 
  • #53
ehild said:
I saw your Profile :smile:

You become a real scientist if you understand what you do. Maths and Physics are not mere collections of recipes. You have to start from the bases and build up your knowledge step by step. Every step must follow logically from your previous knowledge, and then you would feel a new theorem or proof easy as if you could have discovered them by yourself.

ehild


Thank you ehild I will follow your suggestion.:smile:
 
Back
Top