Finite Elements in a Set of Rational Numbers Proof

In summary, the problem is asking to prove that there are only a finite number of rational numbers in the interval (0,1) that can make the function f(x) greater than or equal to a given value epsilon. The solution involves determining for which values of q, 1/q is greater than or equal to epsilon, and using that to show that there are only a finite number of elements y in (0,1) that can make f(y) greater than or equal to epsilon.
  • #1
RPierre
10
0

Homework Statement


This problem is insanely intuitive.

Define [tex] f : (0,1) \rightarrow \Re [/tex] by

[tex]f(x)=\begin{cases}
1/q&\text{if } x \neq 0 \text{, is rational, and }x = p/q \text{in lowest terms}\\
0&\text{otherwise }\end{cases} [/tex]

Suppose [tex]\epsilon > 0[/tex]. Prove that there are at most a finite number of elements [tex]y\in(0,1)[/tex] such that [tex]f(y)\geq\epsilon[/tex]


Homework Equations


Must be a rigorous proof. Thats about it.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have no Idea where to START in solving this. All that I know is over (0,1), f(y) is always going to be 1/q, and therefore y must be rational in the form p/q. Otherwise, I have nothing on this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
f(y)=1/q only if y=p/q. If y is irrational which it surely can be between 0 and 1, then f(y)=0.

This is pretty straightforward. Answer the question: For what values of q is 1/q >= epsilon? So what does that tell you about the values of y such that f(y) >= epsilon?
 

FAQ: Finite Elements in a Set of Rational Numbers Proof

What is the purpose of a proof involving finite elements in a set of rational numbers?

The purpose of such a proof is to demonstrate the existence of a finite set of rational numbers that can represent any given real number. This is important because it allows for efficient and accurate calculations in computer algorithms and mathematical models.

How does the use of finite elements in a set of rational numbers differ from other numerical methods?

Finite elements in a set of rational numbers use a discrete approach, where a finite set of rational numbers is used to approximate a continuous function. Other numerical methods, such as calculus-based methods, use a continuous approach to model and approximate functions.

What are the limitations of using finite elements in a set of rational numbers?

One limitation is that the accuracy of the approximation depends on the size of the finite set of rational numbers used. A larger set can provide a more accurate result, but it also requires more computational resources. Additionally, finite elements in a set of rational numbers may not be suitable for highly complex or irregular functions.

How is a proof involving finite elements in a set of rational numbers beneficial in practical applications?

This type of proof provides a theoretical foundation for using finite elements in a set of rational numbers in practical applications. It ensures that the method is valid and can be used with confidence in various mathematical and scientific fields, such as engineering, physics, and computer science.

Are there any real-world examples where finite elements in a set of rational numbers are used?

Yes, finite elements in a set of rational numbers are commonly used in computer graphics, where they are used to approximate curves and surfaces in 3D modeling. They are also used in engineering for finite element analysis, which is used to simulate and analyze the behavior of structures and systems.

Back
Top