Finite group of order 4n+2 then elements of odd order form a subgroup.

In summary: G that is just 1/2 of the size of G, and that is the transpositions in G.so, in summary, i proved that if G is a finite group of order 4n+2, and there exists an odd order element in G, then the order of the subgroup $H$ containing that element is 2n+1.
  • #1
caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
816
15
Let $G$ be a finite group of order $4n+2$ for some integer $n$. Let $g_1, g_2 \in G$ be such that $o(g_1)\equiv o(g_2) \equiv 1 \, (\mbox{mod} 2)$. Show that $o(g_1g_2)$ is also odd.
I found a solution to this recently but I think that solution uses a very indirect approach. Not saying that that solution was bad.. just indirect. So I wanted to see a more direct proof. I will post the solution I am talking about later in this thread once this is solved since if I post it now it might interfere with the thought process. I am sorry but I have no ideas of my own on how to go about doing it in a different way. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
i can't think of a "direct proof" either.

we have the (cayley) isomorphism of $G$ with $S_{4n+2}$, so we can regard $G$ as a subgroup of $S_{4n+2}$.

thus we can talk about $G \cap A_{4n+2}$. the order of this group is either $|G|/2$ or $|G|$.

now 2 divides the order of $G$ so we have (by cauchy's theorem) an element $x \in G$ of order 2. since left-multiplication by $x$ doesn't fix any element of $G$, $x$ is a product of $2n+1$ disjoint transpositions, so $|G \cap A_{4n+2}| \neq |G|$.

hence $|G \cap A_{4n+2}| = 2n+1$. let's call this subgroup of $G$, $H$. clearly every element of $H$ has odd order (since $H$ does). we then have two cosets of $H, H$ and $xH$. we want to show that every element of $xH$ has order 2.

so suppose $xh \in xH$ has odd order, say $2k+1$. then:

$(xh)^{2k+1} = e$
$(xh)^{2k}xh = e$
$((xh)^2)^kxh = e$

now since $H$ is normal in $G$, (it's of index 2) $(xh)^2 = xhxh = (xhx^{-1})h = h' \in H$, so:

$h'^kxh = e$
$x = h'^{-k}h^{-1} \in H$, a contradiction.

thus any element of odd order must lie in $H$.
 
  • #3
Deveno said:
i can't think of a "direct proof" either.

we have the (cayley) isomorphism of $G$ with $S_{4n+2}$, so we can regard $G$ as a subgroup of $S_{4n+2}$.

thus we can talk about $G \cap A_{4n+2}$. the order of this group is either $|G|/2$ or $|G|$.

now 2 divides the order of $G$ so we have (by cauchy's theorem) an element $x \in G$ of order 2. since left-multiplication by $x$ doesn't fix any element of $G$, $x$ is a product of $2n+1$ disjoint transpositions, so $|G \cap A_{4n+2}| \neq |G|$.

hence $|G \cap A_{4n+2}| = 2n+1$. let's call this subgroup of $G$, $H$. clearly every element of $H$ has odd order (since $H$ does). we then have two cosets of $H, H$ and $xH$. we want to show that every element of $xH$ has order 2.

so suppose $xh \in xH$ has odd order, say $2k+1$. then:

$(xh)^{2k+1} = e$
$(xh)^{2k}xh = e$
$((xh)^2)^kxh = e$

now since $H$ is normal in $G$, (it's of index 2) $(xh)^2 = xhxh = (xhx^{-1})h = h' \in H$, so:

$h'^kxh = e$
$x = h'^{-k}h^{-1} \in H$, a contradiction.

thus any element of odd order must lie in $H$.
Thank you Denevo. Your proof is even more indirect..but BRILLIANT nonetheless. The proof I was talking about shares some of its features with your proof but is simpler in that it has shorter length. It just depends on the following fact which can be easily proved:
Let $\lambda_g$ denote the permutation of $G$ given by $\lambda_g(x)=gx$ for $x\in G$. Then $\lambda_g$ is an even permutation if and only if the order of $g$ is odd. The rest follows easily.
Probably your proof is longer because you were able to prove much more than asked.. the fact that $H$ is normal and is of index $2$.
Can you give some insight into how did you approach the problem and some group theory Zen wisdom in general?
 
  • #4
my thought-process ran something like this:

all we really have to go on is the order of G. i tried just looking at various powers of the products $g_1,g_2$ but was getting nowhere.

so then i observed that if an element of G *wasn't* of odd order, it had to be of order 2. and i needed some kind of "commutation" rule.

see, ideally, if G was abelian we could argue like so:

suppose |a| = k, and |b| = m, where k and m are both odd, so km is odd

then (ab)km = akmbkm = e, so |ab| divides km, and is thus odd.

but, G was not necessarily abelian, so i was looking at ways to get "get a's across b's".

i always think of normal subgroups as "sort-of" abelian things:

aH = Ha. so i thought maybe if i could show the odd order elements were exactly half of G i'd be home-free. so i thought: how can i make a subgroup that i know is exactly half of G (i was thinking along the lines of a dihedral group or something).

then i realized that that we can always look at a (finite) group as a permutation group (of itself), and either half, or all of the elements would have to be "even" (in the sense of permutations). and an element of order 2 (of which G surely has to have SOME) would act as a "flip" on the 2n+1 pairs of elements of G, so would be "odd".

so this idea formed in my mind:

odd-order elements <--->even permutations
elements of order 2<--->odd permutations

that's really "the whole idea", showing that every element of xH has order 2 (or rather does NOT have odd order) just uses the normality of H to get around the fact that G isn't abelian (so i can "cancel the x's" without commutativity). perhaps i could have been more elegant in my presentation, i was sort of fumbling my way through it.
 
  • #5
Deveno said:
my thought-process ran something like this:

all we really have to go on is the order of G. i tried just looking at various powers of the products $g_1,g_2$ but was getting nowhere.

so then i observed that if an element of G *wasn't* of odd order, it had to be of order 2. and i needed some kind of "commutation" rule.

see, ideally, if G was abelian we could argue like so:

suppose |a| = k, and |b| = m, where k and m are both odd, so km is odd

then (ab)km = akmbkm = e, so |ab| divides km, and is thus odd.

but, G was not necessarily abelian, so i was looking at ways to get "get a's across b's".

i always think of normal subgroups as "sort-of" abelian things:

aH = Ha. so i thought maybe if i could show the odd order elements were exactly half of G i'd be home-free. so i thought: how can i make a subgroup that i know is exactly half of G (i was thinking along the lines of a dihedral group or something).

then i realized that that we can always look at a (finite) group as a permutation group (of itself), and either half, or all of the elements would have to be "even" (in the sense of permutations). and an element of order 2 (of which G surely has to have SOME) would act as a "flip" on the 2n+1 pairs of elements of G, so would be "odd".

so this idea formed in my mind:

odd-order elements <--->even permutations
elements of order 2<--->odd permutations

that's really "the whole idea", showing that every element of xH has order 2 (or rather does NOT have odd order) just uses the normality of H to get around the fact that G isn't abelian (so i can "cancel the x's" without commutativity). perhaps i could have been more elegant in my presentation, i was sort of fumbling my way through it.
Thank You for taking the time out and listening to my request. From the day I first joined MHF, to this day at MHB, I have learned a great deal of group theory and Abstract Algebra from you... and mathematics in general.
 

FAQ: Finite group of order 4n+2 then elements of odd order form a subgroup.

How can I prove that a finite group of order 4n+2 has a subgroup formed by elements of odd order?

To prove this statement, we can use the Cauchy's theorem which states that if a prime number p divides the order of a group G, then there exists an element of order p in G. In this case, since 4n+2 is an even number, it can be written as 2(2n+1), which means that 2 divides the order of the group. Therefore, by Cauchy's theorem, there exists an element of order 2 in the group. This element and the identity element form a subgroup of order 2. Now, we can use Lagrange's theorem which states that if H is a subgroup of a finite group G, then the order of H divides the order of G. Since the order of the subgroup is 2, the order of the group must be divisible by 2 as well. This means that there must be at least one more element in the group with an odd order, which forms a subgroup with the identity element and the element of order 2. Hence, the statement is proved.

Can a finite group of order 4n+2 have more than one subgroup formed by elements of odd order?

Yes, it is possible for a finite group of order 4n+2 to have more than one subgroup formed by elements of odd order. This is because, in addition to the subgroup formed by the element of order 2 and the identity element, there can be more elements in the group with odd order. Each of these elements, when combined with the identity element and the element of order 2, forms a different subgroup of odd order.

Is the subgroup formed by elements of odd order always a normal subgroup in a finite group of order 4n+2?

No, the subgroup formed by elements of odd order is not always a normal subgroup in a finite group of order 4n+2. A normal subgroup is a subgroup that is invariant under conjugation by elements of the group. In this case, the subgroup formed by elements of odd order is only guaranteed to be a normal subgroup if the group is abelian. Otherwise, there may be elements in the group that do not commute with the elements of the subgroup, making it not normal.

Can a finite group of order 4n+2 have a subgroup formed by elements of even order?

Yes, it is possible for a finite group of order 4n+2 to have a subgroup formed by elements of even order. For example, if the group is cyclic, every element in the group has the same order as the group and therefore, the subgroup formed by elements of even order would also exist.

Does the statement "finite group of order 4n+2 then elements of odd order form a subgroup" hold true for all finite groups?

No, the statement does not hold true for all finite groups. It only holds true for groups of order 4n+2. For groups of other orders, there may or may not exist a subgroup formed by elements of odd order. For example, in a group of order 8, there may not be any elements of odd order, making the statement false for this group.

Back
Top